{"title":"¿Por quién debo gritar?","authors":"Sara Baugh-Harris","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Article| October 01 2023 ¿Por quién debo gritar? Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Davidson College. email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Sara Baugh-Harris; ¿Por quién debo gritar?. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 586–593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search In a recent Vanity Fair article, Molly Jong-Fast, a white American author, notes that before the Supreme Court overthrew Roe v. Wade, she used to think “abortion is healthcare” was a catchy, but hyperbolic statement.1 As she witnesses how the Court’s decision has already wrought damage and misery for so many, she writes: “This loss of bodily autonomy on the federal level has created medical disasters for women all throughout the country.”2 What strikes me in Jong-Fast’s comments is not simply the stark reality she is painting. Rather, it startles me because it is an honest encapsulation of the whiplash many white American women are experiencing as they ponder their own bodily autonomy in serious, material ways, some for the first time since 1973. For many, this reckoning began with Trump’s election in 2016.3 These fears were greatly amplified by stunned outrage as the Supreme Court’s... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of autoethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research Article| October 01 2023 ¿Por quién debo gritar? Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Davidson College. email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Sara Baugh-Harris; ¿Por quién debo gritar?. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 586–593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search In a recent Vanity Fair article, Molly Jong-Fast, a white American author, notes that before the Supreme Court overthrew Roe v. Wade, she used to think “abortion is healthcare” was a catchy, but hyperbolic statement.1 As she witnesses how the Court’s decision has already wrought damage and misery for so many, she writes: “This loss of bodily autonomy on the federal level has created medical disasters for women all throughout the country.”2 What strikes me in Jong-Fast’s comments is not simply the stark reality she is painting. Rather, it startles me because it is an honest encapsulation of the whiplash many white American women are experiencing as they ponder their own bodily autonomy in serious, material ways, some for the first time since 1973. For many, this reckoning began with Trump’s election in 2016.3 These fears were greatly amplified by stunned outrage as the Supreme Court’s... You do not currently have access to this content.