Implementations of Artificial Intelligence in Various Domains of IT Governance: A Systematic Literature Review

Eva Hariyanti, Made Balin Janeswari, Malvin Mikhael Moningka, Fikri Maulana Aziz, Annisa Rahma Putri, Oxy Setyo Hapsari, Nyoman Agus Arya Dwija Sutha, Yohannes Alexander Agusti Sinaga, Manik Prasanthi Bendesa
{"title":"Implementations of Artificial Intelligence in Various Domains of IT Governance: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Eva Hariyanti, Made Balin Janeswari, Malvin Mikhael Moningka, Fikri Maulana Aziz, Annisa Rahma Putri, Oxy Setyo Hapsari, Nyoman Agus Arya Dwija Sutha, Yohannes Alexander Agusti Sinaga, Manik Prasanthi Bendesa","doi":"10.20473/jisebi.9.2.305-319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prevalent in various industries, including IT governance. By integrating AI into the governance environment, organizations can benefit from the consolidation of frameworks and best practices. However, the adoption of AI across different stages of the governance process is unevenly distributed. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to perform a systematic literature review on applying artificial intelligence (AI) in IT governance processes, explicitly focusing on the Deming cycle. This study overlooks the specific details of the AI methods used in the various stages of IT governance processes. Methods: The search approach acquires relevant papers from Elsevier, Emerald, Google Scholar, Springer, and IEEE Xplore. The obtained results were then filtered using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the selection of relevant studies. Results: The search yielded 359 papers. Following our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we pinpointed 42 primary studies that discuss how AI is implemented in every domain of IT Governance related to the Deming cycle. Conclusion: We found that AI implementation is more dominant in the plan, do, and check stages of the Deming cycle, with a particular emphasis on domains such as risk management, strategy alignment, and performance measurement since most AI applications are not able to perform well in different contexts as well as the other usage driven by its unique capabilities. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Deming cycle, Governance, IT Governance domain, Systematic literature review","PeriodicalId":16185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.9.2.305-319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prevalent in various industries, including IT governance. By integrating AI into the governance environment, organizations can benefit from the consolidation of frameworks and best practices. However, the adoption of AI across different stages of the governance process is unevenly distributed. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to perform a systematic literature review on applying artificial intelligence (AI) in IT governance processes, explicitly focusing on the Deming cycle. This study overlooks the specific details of the AI methods used in the various stages of IT governance processes. Methods: The search approach acquires relevant papers from Elsevier, Emerald, Google Scholar, Springer, and IEEE Xplore. The obtained results were then filtered using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the selection of relevant studies. Results: The search yielded 359 papers. Following our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we pinpointed 42 primary studies that discuss how AI is implemented in every domain of IT Governance related to the Deming cycle. Conclusion: We found that AI implementation is more dominant in the plan, do, and check stages of the Deming cycle, with a particular emphasis on domains such as risk management, strategy alignment, and performance measurement since most AI applications are not able to perform well in different contexts as well as the other usage driven by its unique capabilities. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Deming cycle, Governance, IT Governance domain, Systematic literature review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在不同IT治理领域的实现:系统的文献综述
背景:人工智能(AI)在各个行业越来越普遍,包括IT治理。通过将AI集成到治理环境中,组织可以从框架和最佳实践的整合中获益。然而,在治理过程的不同阶段采用人工智能是不均匀分布的。目的:本研究的主要目的是对人工智能(AI)在IT治理过程中的应用进行系统的文献综述,明确地关注戴明周期。本研究忽略了在IT治理过程的各个阶段中使用的人工智能方法的具体细节。方法:检索Elsevier、Emerald、谷歌Scholar、施普林格、IEEE explore等网站的相关论文。然后使用预定义的纳入和排除标准对获得的结果进行筛选,以确保选择相关研究。结果:检索得到359篇论文。根据我们的纳入和排除标准,我们确定了42项主要研究,这些研究讨论了AI如何在与Deming周期相关的IT治理的每个领域中实现。结论:我们发现人工智能的实施在戴明周期的计划、执行和检查阶段更占主导地位,特别强调风险管理、战略协调和绩效衡量等领域,因为大多数人工智能应用程序无法在不同的环境中表现良好,以及由其独特功能驱动的其他使用。关键词:人工智能,戴明周期,治理,IT治理领域,系统文献综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sentiment Analysis on a Large Indonesian Product Review Dataset Leveraging Biotic Interaction Knowledge Graph and Network Analysis to Uncover Insect Vectors of Plant Virus Model-based Decision Support System Using a System Dynamics Approach to Increase Corn Productivity Optimizing Support Vector Machine Performance for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis Using GridSearchCV and PCA-Based Feature Extraction A Practical Approach to Enhance Data Quality Management in Government: Case Study of Indonesian Customs and Excise Office
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1