Controlled chaos: examining collaborative response to the 2017 Hattiesburg tornado

Braden Hale Bagley, Kathryn Anthony, Candace Bright, Edward Sayre, Carrie Reif-Stice, Steven Venette, Jessica Beckham
{"title":"Controlled chaos: examining collaborative response to the 2017 Hattiesburg tornado","authors":"Braden Hale Bagley, Kathryn Anthony, Candace Bright, Edward Sayre, Carrie Reif-Stice, Steven Venette, Jessica Beckham","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2023.2271938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractHattiesburg, Mississippi experienced two tornados within a four-year span (2013–2017). Community members who participated in response and recovery to both disasters were interviewed to understand how coordination changed between the two events. The purposive sample included representatives from a variety of organizational types, sizes, and missions. Four findings emerged detailing how organizations used collaborative management networks to respond to the disaster. Respondents indicated the importance of coordination, communication facilitation, identification, and experience. Lessons learned in 2013 did not have to be learned in 2017 when resultant network coordination and effective responses were retained by actors and made a part of their routine responses to crises.Keywords: Communitydisastersresponsetornado Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [U54MD008602].","PeriodicalId":500651,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"112 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2023.2271938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractHattiesburg, Mississippi experienced two tornados within a four-year span (2013–2017). Community members who participated in response and recovery to both disasters were interviewed to understand how coordination changed between the two events. The purposive sample included representatives from a variety of organizational types, sizes, and missions. Four findings emerged detailing how organizations used collaborative management networks to respond to the disaster. Respondents indicated the importance of coordination, communication facilitation, identification, and experience. Lessons learned in 2013 did not have to be learned in 2017 when resultant network coordination and effective responses were retained by actors and made a part of their routine responses to crises.Keywords: Communitydisastersresponsetornado Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [U54MD008602].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可控混乱:考察对2017年哈蒂斯堡龙卷风的协同响应
密西西比州的蒂斯堡在四年内(2013-2017年)经历了两次龙卷风。我们采访了参与两次灾害响应和恢复的社区成员,以了解这两次灾害之间的协调变化情况。目的样本包括来自各种组织类型、规模和任务的代表。四项调查结果详细说明了组织如何使用协作管理网络来应对灾难。受访者指出协调、沟通便利、识别和经验的重要性。2013年的经验教训无需在2017年吸取,行动者保留了由此产生的网络协调和有效应对措施,并将其作为日常危机应对措施的一部分。关键词:社区灾害响应龙卷风披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究所的支持[U54MD008602]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Daughterwork in times of social upheaval How can social media contribute to friendship jealousy and conflict among early adolescents? Controlled chaos: examining collaborative response to the 2017 Hattiesburg tornado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1