Effects of formal mentoring support on newcomer–protégé affective organizational commitment: a self-concept-based perspective

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Human Resource Management Pub Date : 2023-10-21 DOI:10.1002/hrm.22198
Thomas A. Birtch, Zhenyao Cai, Flora F. T. Chiang
{"title":"Effects of formal mentoring support on newcomer–protégé affective organizational commitment: a self-concept-based perspective","authors":"Thomas A. Birtch,&nbsp;Zhenyao Cai,&nbsp;Flora F. T. Chiang","doi":"10.1002/hrm.22198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study proposes and tests a self-concept-based perspective for the effects of formal mentoring support on affective organizational commitment (AOC) via multiple mediators. Using time-lagged multi-source dyadic data (<i>n</i> = 203), we demonstrate that formal mentoring support significantly influences newcomer–protégés' AOC through an underlying self-evaluative mechanism indicated by organization-based self-esteem (OBSE), even in the presence of a well-established alternative mediator (perceived organizational support; POS). Moreover, we further demonstrate when or under what circumstances such effects might be attenuated or exaggerated by introducing a salient boundary condition to such a process (i.e., perceived mentor organizational prototypicality). As the findings reveal, by making newcomer–protégés feel good about themselves in the workplace (i.e., perceive self-value) formal mentoring support can also promote organizational commitment, effects that are likely to be amplified when the formal mentor is perceived to be prototypical of the organization. Thus, bridging the mentoring and socialization literatures, the inclusion of our proposed mediators and moderator and testing their relationships simultaneously not only provides a more nuanced view of the underlying mechanisms through which the effects of formal mentoring support are channeled to influence newcomer–protégés' work attitudes but it offers new theoretical elaboration and contextual understanding that we hope will prompt future research and be of benefit to human resource practitioners. Implications to theory, practice and future research directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48310,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management","volume":"63 2","pages":"225-242"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.22198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study proposes and tests a self-concept-based perspective for the effects of formal mentoring support on affective organizational commitment (AOC) via multiple mediators. Using time-lagged multi-source dyadic data (n = 203), we demonstrate that formal mentoring support significantly influences newcomer–protégés' AOC through an underlying self-evaluative mechanism indicated by organization-based self-esteem (OBSE), even in the presence of a well-established alternative mediator (perceived organizational support; POS). Moreover, we further demonstrate when or under what circumstances such effects might be attenuated or exaggerated by introducing a salient boundary condition to such a process (i.e., perceived mentor organizational prototypicality). As the findings reveal, by making newcomer–protégés feel good about themselves in the workplace (i.e., perceive self-value) formal mentoring support can also promote organizational commitment, effects that are likely to be amplified when the formal mentor is perceived to be prototypical of the organization. Thus, bridging the mentoring and socialization literatures, the inclusion of our proposed mediators and moderator and testing their relationships simultaneously not only provides a more nuanced view of the underlying mechanisms through which the effects of formal mentoring support are channeled to influence newcomer–protégés' work attitudes but it offers new theoretical elaboration and contextual understanding that we hope will prompt future research and be of benefit to human resource practitioners. Implications to theory, practice and future research directions are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正式指导支持对新人-被指导者情感组织承诺的影响:基于自我概念的视角
本研究提出并测试了一种基于自我概念的观点,即正式指导支持通过多重中介对情感组织承诺(AOC)产生的影响。通过使用时间滞后的多源二元数据(n = 203),我们证明了正式的指导支持会通过基于组织的自尊(OBSE)这一潜在的自我评价机制显著影响新人-被保护人的情感组织承诺,即使在存在一个成熟的替代中介(感知组织支持;POS)的情况下也是如此。此外,我们还进一步证明了在什么时候或什么情况下,通过在这一过程中引入一个突出的边界条件(即感知到的导师组织原型性),这种效应可能会被削弱或夸大。正如研究结果所揭示的那样,通过让新人-候补者对自己在工作场所有良好的自我感觉(即感知到自我价值),正式的指导支持也能促进组织承诺,而当正式指导者被认为是组织原型时,这种效应很可能会被放大。因此,将我们提出的中介因素和调节因素纳入并同时测试它们之间的关系,不仅可以在指导和社会化文献之间架起一座桥梁,而且还可以提供新的理论阐述和背景理解,我们希望这将促进未来的研究,并对人力资源从业人员有所裨益。本文讨论了对理论、实践和未来研究方向的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Covering the broad spectrum of contemporary human resource management, this journal provides academics and practicing managers with the latest concepts, tools, and information for effective problem solving and decision making in this field. Broad in scope, it explores issues of societal, organizational, and individual relevance. Journal articles discuss new theories, new techniques, case studies, models, and research trends of particular significance to practicing HR managers
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The Consequences of Age Discrimination via Perceived Work Ability: Downstream Effects on Well-Being, Performance, and Motivation A Strengths-Based Human Resource Management Approach to Neurodiversity: A Multi-Actor Qualitative Study Career Guidance and Employment Issues for Neurodivergent Individuals: A Scoping Review and Stakeholder Consultation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1