Application of Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Analysis In UK HPR1000

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science Pub Date : 2023-10-21 DOI:10.1115/1.4063874
Jinkai Wang, Qi Wang
{"title":"Application of Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Analysis In UK HPR1000","authors":"Jinkai Wang, Qi Wang","doi":"10.1115/1.4063874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (L3 PSA) is required in UK Generic Design Assessment (GDA) to demonstrate that a new nuclear power plant is suitable to be built in UK. L3 PSA is used to assess the individual and societal risk and compare the results against the offsite Radiation Protection Targets (RPTs) for fault and accident conditions. There is little relevant good practice and mature standard for L3 PSAs that have recently been implemented worldwide. In this study, a pilot L3 PSA is performed for UK HPR1000 to reflect the UK context and relevant good practices. It introduces the methodology and the processes to be followed to perform conditional consequences calculations for the faults and accident scenarios. All radiation sources are considered and analyzed. The radiological risks to a potential UK site are analyzed and compared against RPTs. A widely used code - PC COSYMA, is selected for quantification. The strengths and limitations of the code are justified based on the project situation, and either qualitative arguments or supplementary analysis is subsequently proposed to overcome the limitations. The final L3 PSA results are derived to support the demonstration that the offsite radiological risks for UK HPR1000 have been achieved as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) and has met the UK regulatory expectation.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":"24 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (L3 PSA) is required in UK Generic Design Assessment (GDA) to demonstrate that a new nuclear power plant is suitable to be built in UK. L3 PSA is used to assess the individual and societal risk and compare the results against the offsite Radiation Protection Targets (RPTs) for fault and accident conditions. There is little relevant good practice and mature standard for L3 PSAs that have recently been implemented worldwide. In this study, a pilot L3 PSA is performed for UK HPR1000 to reflect the UK context and relevant good practices. It introduces the methodology and the processes to be followed to perform conditional consequences calculations for the faults and accident scenarios. All radiation sources are considered and analyzed. The radiological risks to a potential UK site are analyzed and compared against RPTs. A widely used code - PC COSYMA, is selected for quantification. The strengths and limitations of the code are justified based on the project situation, and either qualitative arguments or supplementary analysis is subsequently proposed to overcome the limitations. The final L3 PSA results are derived to support the demonstration that the offsite radiological risks for UK HPR1000 have been achieved as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) and has met the UK regulatory expectation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级概率安全分析在英国HPR1000核电站中的应用
摘要英国通用设计评估(GDA)要求进行3级概率安全评估(L3 PSA),以证明新核电站适合在英国建造。L3 PSA用于评估个人和社会风险,并将结果与故障和事故条件下的场外辐射防护目标(RPTs)进行比较。目前在世界范围内实施的L3 psa相关的良好实践和成熟标准很少。在本研究中,为了反映英国的情况和相关的良好实践,对英国HPR1000进行了L3 PSA试点。它介绍了执行故障和事故情景的条件后果计算的方法和过程。对所有辐射源进行了考虑和分析。对英国潜在场地的辐射风险进行了分析,并与RPTs进行了比较。选择广泛使用的代码pccosyma进行量化。代码的优点和局限性是基于项目情况来证明的,然后提出定性论证或补充分析来克服这些局限性。最终的L3 PSA结果证明,英国HPR1000的场外辐射风险已经达到了合理可行的最低水平(ALARP),并满足了英国监管机构的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
期刊最新文献
Verification and Geometry Optimization of a One Fluid Molten Salt Reactor (OFMSR) with Fixed Volume The Transfer of Xenon-135 to Molten Salt Reactor Graphite Molten Salt Pump Journal-Bearings Dynamic Characteristics Under Hydrodynamic Lubrication Conditions Technical Brief: Safeguardability Analysis of a Molten Salt Sampling System Design An Improved Heat Flux Partitioning Model of Nucleate Boiling Under Saturated Pool Boiling Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1