Walking interviews in organizational research

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.008
Karen Bilsland, Sabina Siebert
{"title":"Walking interviews in organizational research","authors":"Karen Bilsland,&nbsp;Sabina Siebert","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this paper is to discuss the benefits of walking interviews in organizational research. We discuss five specific strengths of walking interviews and compare them to sit-down interviews and shadowing. Cognisant of the importance of place within which research is conducted, we analyze the walking interview method of collecting research material, and we put forward socio-spatial methodology for application in organizational research. The key theme running through this paper is that the place where research takes place matters; it matters when the focus of research is on materiality of organizations, but it also yields insights into other (place-sensitive) organizational phenomena. We identify five strengths of walking interviews: co-creation of meaning, reversal of power between interviewer and interviewee, places as prompts, the interview as a sensory experience, and insights into emotions. We discuss limitations of walking interviews, as well as strategies for mitigating these limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"42 2","pages":"Pages 161-172"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323000506/pdfft?md5=be444f2011607d5f5e5c059463aedd90&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237323000506-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323000506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss the benefits of walking interviews in organizational research. We discuss five specific strengths of walking interviews and compare them to sit-down interviews and shadowing. Cognisant of the importance of place within which research is conducted, we analyze the walking interview method of collecting research material, and we put forward socio-spatial methodology for application in organizational research. The key theme running through this paper is that the place where research takes place matters; it matters when the focus of research is on materiality of organizations, but it also yields insights into other (place-sensitive) organizational phenomena. We identify five strengths of walking interviews: co-creation of meaning, reversal of power between interviewer and interviewee, places as prompts, the interview as a sensory experience, and insights into emotions. We discuss limitations of walking interviews, as well as strategies for mitigating these limitations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织研究中的步行访谈
本文旨在讨论组织研究中步行访谈的好处。我们讨论了步行访谈的五个具体优势,并将其与坐下来访谈和影子访谈进行了比较。考虑到开展研究的地点的重要性,我们分析了收集研究材料的步行访谈方法,并提出了应用于组织研究的社会空间方法。本文贯穿的关键主题是,开展研究的地点很重要;当研究的重点是组织的物质性时,它很重要,但它也能让我们深入了解其他(对地点敏感的)组织现象。我们指出了步行访谈的五个优势:意义的共同创造、访谈者与被访者之间的权力逆转、作为提示的场所、作为感官体验的访谈以及对情感的洞察。我们讨论了步行访谈的局限性,以及缓解这些局限性的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The need to belong: Relational coping strategies in the face of coworker envy Decomposing profile-to-role configurations in R&D-focused entrepreneurial teams Leadership identity construction in a hybrid medical context: ‘Claimed’ but not ‘granted’ Leader's relational power and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of perceived organizational support for creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1