Do Shia-Sunni Tensions Affect Iranian-Saudi Relations?

M. A. Podrezov
{"title":"Do Shia-Sunni Tensions Affect Iranian-Saudi Relations?","authors":"M. A. Podrezov","doi":"10.24833/2541-8831-2023-2-26-50-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today the rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia is one of the defining factors in the Middle East political arena. The Islamic world's division into Shiite and Sunni is often considered a factor affecting bilateral relations between Tehran and Riyadh. Iran positions itself as the center of gravity for all the Shiites in the region, while Saudi Arabia seeks to form an anti-Iranian alliance on a Sunni basis. This article assesses the impact of the doctrinal tensions between these two branches of Islam on the Iranian approach towards its relations with Saudi Arabia. For this purpose, the author analyses the rhetoric of Iranian officials, clerics, and state-run media in the context of the main concepts of the Iranian contemporary religious ideology. The author concludes that criticism of Saudi Arabia has lost its religious connotation and Tehran does not position its confrontation with Riyadh as a fight against the enemies of Islam or apostates. The traditional epithets classifying their holders as supporters of the forces of darkness and actively used against the Western countries and Israel are not cited by critics of the Saudi dynasty. Moreover, the criticism of Wahhabism as a religious movement is not linked to the kingdom's current political leadership. On the contrary, the Iranian criticism of the Saudi foreign and domestic policies focuses on condemning the Saudi authorities' infringement on human rights and media freedom, supporting the protest movement in Iran, and fighting the Houthis. Even the persecution of Shiites in Saudi Arabia, to which the Iranian press has devoted considerable attention, is viewed from the perspective of the global concept of human rights, rather than as the struggle of one religious group against another. The kingdom itself is not considered an ideological enemy of Iran, which since the Islamic Revolution has been the US and Israel. The statements by some representatives of the Iranian political establishment on the need for peaceful coexistence between the two countries, along with the March 2023 agreements on normalizing bilateral relations indicate Tehran's pragmatic approach to interaction with Riyadh which is not affected by the ShiaSunni controversy in its dogmatic and religious dimensions.","PeriodicalId":33644,"journal":{"name":"Kontsept filosofiia religiia kul''tura","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kontsept filosofiia religiia kul''tura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2023-2-26-50-62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today the rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia is one of the defining factors in the Middle East political arena. The Islamic world's division into Shiite and Sunni is often considered a factor affecting bilateral relations between Tehran and Riyadh. Iran positions itself as the center of gravity for all the Shiites in the region, while Saudi Arabia seeks to form an anti-Iranian alliance on a Sunni basis. This article assesses the impact of the doctrinal tensions between these two branches of Islam on the Iranian approach towards its relations with Saudi Arabia. For this purpose, the author analyses the rhetoric of Iranian officials, clerics, and state-run media in the context of the main concepts of the Iranian contemporary religious ideology. The author concludes that criticism of Saudi Arabia has lost its religious connotation and Tehran does not position its confrontation with Riyadh as a fight against the enemies of Islam or apostates. The traditional epithets classifying their holders as supporters of the forces of darkness and actively used against the Western countries and Israel are not cited by critics of the Saudi dynasty. Moreover, the criticism of Wahhabism as a religious movement is not linked to the kingdom's current political leadership. On the contrary, the Iranian criticism of the Saudi foreign and domestic policies focuses on condemning the Saudi authorities' infringement on human rights and media freedom, supporting the protest movement in Iran, and fighting the Houthis. Even the persecution of Shiites in Saudi Arabia, to which the Iranian press has devoted considerable attention, is viewed from the perspective of the global concept of human rights, rather than as the struggle of one religious group against another. The kingdom itself is not considered an ideological enemy of Iran, which since the Islamic Revolution has been the US and Israel. The statements by some representatives of the Iranian political establishment on the need for peaceful coexistence between the two countries, along with the March 2023 agreements on normalizing bilateral relations indicate Tehran's pragmatic approach to interaction with Riyadh which is not affected by the ShiaSunni controversy in its dogmatic and religious dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什叶派和逊尼派的紧张关系会影响伊朗和沙特的关系吗?
今天,伊朗和沙特阿拉伯之间的竞争是中东政治舞台上的决定性因素之一。伊斯兰世界分裂为什叶派和逊尼派通常被认为是影响德黑兰和利雅得双边关系的一个因素。伊朗将自己定位为该地区所有什叶派的重心,而沙特阿拉伯则试图在逊尼派的基础上组建一个反伊朗联盟。本文评估了伊斯兰教这两个分支之间的教义紧张关系对伊朗处理与沙特阿拉伯关系的影响。为此,作者在伊朗当代宗教意识形态的主要概念背景下分析了伊朗官员、神职人员和国营媒体的修辞。作者的结论是,对沙特阿拉伯的批评已经失去了宗教内涵,德黑兰并没有将其与利雅得的对抗定位为与伊斯兰教的敌人或叛教者的斗争。沙特王朝的批评者并没有引用将他们的持有者归类为黑暗势力的支持者并积极用于反对西方国家和以色列的传统绰号。此外,对瓦哈比主义作为一种宗教运动的批评与沙特王国目前的政治领导层无关。相反,伊朗对沙特外交和国内政策的批评主要集中在谴责沙特当局侵犯人权和媒体自由、支持伊朗抗议运动、打击胡塞武装等方面。即使是沙特阿拉伯对什叶派的迫害——伊朗新闻界对此给予了相当大的关注——也是从全球人权概念的角度来看待的,而不是一个宗教团体对另一个宗教团体的斗争。沙特王国本身并不被视为伊朗的意识形态敌人,自伊斯兰革命以来,伊朗一直是美国和以色列的敌人。伊朗政治机构的一些代表关于两国和平共处的必要性的声明,以及2023年3月关于双边关系正常化的协议,表明德黑兰与利雅得互动的务实态度,不受什叶派教义和宗教争议的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vladimir Solovyov: The Philosophy of the Last Classic. Lecture Hic Sunt Dracones: Foreign Space in the English and Russian Worldview as Reflected by the Pejorative Toponymy of the English and Russian Languages Ages, Stories, Styles Cultural-Perceptions of Russia and Russians in China Today Representation of Christmas Praises of Russian Lipovans of Romania on the Internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1