Criminal procedural means of preliminary verification of reports on misuse of budgetary funds

Sergei Ivanovich Gritsaev, Gaysa Mosovich Meretukov
{"title":"Criminal procedural means of preliminary verification of reports on misuse of budgetary funds","authors":"Sergei Ivanovich Gritsaev, Gaysa Mosovich Meretukov","doi":"10.25136/2409-7810.2023.3.43991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of the study is the crimes provided for in Articles 285.1 and Article 285.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the activities of the subject of the investigation in general and to verify reports of misuse of budgetary funds, in particular. The subject of the study was the regularities of the preparation, commission and concealment of this group of crimes, as well as the regularities of the activities of law enforcement agencies to identify, investigate and disclose them. When forming conclusions, the authors were guided by the analysis of the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, other laws regulating the verification of reports on this group of crimes and the conduct of their investigation, the provisions of general criminalistic theories, materials of investigative and judicial practice (materials of 148 criminal cases considered in the courts of the Southern Federal District of the Russian Federation are summarized). The authors consider in detail the investigator's verification of the report on the misuse of budgetary funds, with special attention being paid to the problems of using the means of its implementation. The study used dialectical, logical, statistical, formal and legal research methods, as well as the method of legal modeling. The authors note that when conducting an audit of a report on the misuse of budgetary funds, the investigator needs to use the full range of means specified in Part 1 of Article 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The conducted research made it possible to establish that these funds are sufficient for its implementation, at the same time, their insufficiently detailed regulation in the criminal procedure Law creates difficulties when investigating a crime report. The authors offer organizational and tactical recommendations that will avoid negative consequences when receiving explanations, requesting documents, appointing examinations, etc. At the same time, the authors point out that a complete solution to this problem requires fixing a clear and detailed procedure for using means of verifying a crime report in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":476022,"journal":{"name":"Policejskaâ i sledstvennaâ deâtelʹnostʹ","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policejskaâ i sledstvennaâ deâtelʹnostʹ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7810.2023.3.43991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The object of the study is the crimes provided for in Articles 285.1 and Article 285.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the activities of the subject of the investigation in general and to verify reports of misuse of budgetary funds, in particular. The subject of the study was the regularities of the preparation, commission and concealment of this group of crimes, as well as the regularities of the activities of law enforcement agencies to identify, investigate and disclose them. When forming conclusions, the authors were guided by the analysis of the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, other laws regulating the verification of reports on this group of crimes and the conduct of their investigation, the provisions of general criminalistic theories, materials of investigative and judicial practice (materials of 148 criminal cases considered in the courts of the Southern Federal District of the Russian Federation are summarized). The authors consider in detail the investigator's verification of the report on the misuse of budgetary funds, with special attention being paid to the problems of using the means of its implementation. The study used dialectical, logical, statistical, formal and legal research methods, as well as the method of legal modeling. The authors note that when conducting an audit of a report on the misuse of budgetary funds, the investigator needs to use the full range of means specified in Part 1 of Article 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The conducted research made it possible to establish that these funds are sufficient for its implementation, at the same time, their insufficiently detailed regulation in the criminal procedure Law creates difficulties when investigating a crime report. The authors offer organizational and tactical recommendations that will avoid negative consequences when receiving explanations, requesting documents, appointing examinations, etc. At the same time, the authors point out that a complete solution to this problem requires fixing a clear and detailed procedure for using means of verifying a crime report in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对滥用预算资金的报告进行初步核查的刑事程序手段
研究的对象是《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第285.1条和第285.2条规定的罪行,以及一般调查对象的活动,特别是核查滥用预算资金的报告。研究的主题是这类罪行的准备、实施和隐瞒的规律性,以及执法机构查明、调查和揭露这些罪行的活动的规律性。在得出结论时,作者以分析俄罗斯联邦《刑法典》、俄罗斯联邦《刑事诉讼法》、关于核查这类罪行的报告及其调查行为的其他法律、一般犯罪理论的规定为指导,调查和司法实践材料(俄罗斯联邦南部联邦区法院审理的148起刑事案件的材料摘要)。作者详细审议了调查员对滥用预算资金报告的核查情况,并特别注意了执行报告的手段的使用问题。本研究运用了辩证、逻辑、统计、形式和法律等研究方法,以及法律建模的方法。作者指出,在对滥用预算资金的报告进行审计时,调查人员需要使用《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第144条第1部分规定的全部手段。所进行的研究使人们能够确定,这些资金足以用于执行,同时,刑事诉讼法对这些资金的规定不够详细,在调查犯罪报告时造成了困难。作者提供了组织上和战术上的建议,以避免在接受解释、请求文件、指定检查等方面产生负面后果。同时,作者指出,要彻底解决这一问题,就必须确定一个明确和详细的程序,以便使用《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》中的手段核查犯罪报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Once again about the doctrinal understanding of the terminology of "administrative-tort law" Forensic support for the disclosure and investigation of a crime under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy" Criminal procedural means of preliminary verification of reports on misuse of budgetary funds Methods and cases of "forgery of a person" in the Russian Federation Is challenging testimony a new duty of the accused?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1