Guardians of Freedom: Examining Privacy, Censorship, and Government Legislation in Collection Development

Zoë Abbie Teel
{"title":"Guardians of Freedom: Examining Privacy, Censorship, and Government Legislation in Collection Development","authors":"Zoë Abbie Teel","doi":"10.1080/0361526x.2023.2245862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article delves into the complex and inseparable relationship between collection development in libraries and the interconnected factors of privacy, censorship, and government influence. Libraries, as guardians of information and knowledge, constantly strive to update their collections to meet the diverse needs of patrons. However, in doing so, they face intricate challenges that extend beyond merely acquiring materials. This article aims to shed light on the pivotal role librarians play in collection development. It highlights the need for librarians to consider a wide range of factors, both internal and external, before making informed decisions about their collections. By understanding the multifaceted nature of their responsibilities, librarians can better serve their communities and maintain libraries as vital centers for knowledge dissemination. This article ultimately offers insights that can contribute to the enhancement of collection development practices, ensuring libraries remain adaptive, inclusive, and conducive to the pursuit of knowledge in an ever-changing world.KEYWORDS: Privacy in librariescensorshiplegislationintellectual freedomacademic freedom AcknowledgmentsThis article was originally written for INFO5400: Information Resources Development. The author thanks the University of North Texas (College of Information) for this enriching academic experience.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. American Library Association, “Advocacy and Public Policy,” https://www.ala.org/advocacy/federal-resources (accessed July 15, 2023).2. Paula Wittmann and Nancy Fisher-Allison, “Intentionally Creating a Safe Space for All: The School Library as Refuge,” Knowledge Quest 48, no. 3 (2020): 42.3. Lisa Zhao, “Protection of Library Users’ Privacy: An Analysis of US State Laws,” Chinese Librarianship 26, no. 26 (2008): 8.4. Sandra J. Valenti, Brady D. Lund, and Matthew A. Beckstrom, Library Patrons’ Privacy: Questions and Answers (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2022), 11.5. Judith Rauhofer, “Privacy Is Dead, Get over It! Information Privacy and the Dream of a Risk-Free Society,” Information & Communications Technology Law 17, no. 3 (October 2008): 185–97. doi:10.1080/13600830802472990.6. American Library Association, “Privacy,” https://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacy (accessed July 15, 2023).7. Ibid.8. Ibid.9. Debra Lau Whelan, “A Dirty Little Secret: Self-Censorship,” School Library Journal 55, no. 2 (2009): 26–30.10. Ibid.11. Jennifer Downey, “Self-Censorship in Selection of LGBT-Themed Materials,” Reference & User Services Quarterly 53, no. 2 (Winter 2013): 104–107. https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/self-censorship-selection-lgbt-themed-materials/docview/1470878772/se-2.12. Ibid.13. Jennifer Elaine Steele, “Cases of Censorship in Public Libraries: Wichita Falls, TX,” Public Library Quarterly (2019). doi:10.1080/01616846.2019.1692324.14. “Success Stories: Library,” Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom (Online) 64, no. 5 (2015): 160. https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/success-stories-library/docview/1721338503/se-2 (accessed July 15, 2023).15. Zoe (Abbie) Teel, “Discouraging Freedom in the Library,” The Serials Librarian (2023): 1–6.16. Emily Knox, “The Books Will Still Be in the Library: Narrow Definitions of Censorship in the Discourse of Challengers,” Library Trends 62, no. 4 (2014): 740–749.17. See note 9 above.18. Ibid.19. American Library Association, “Challenge Support,” https://www.ala.org/tools/challengesupport (accessed July 15, 2023).20. Ibid.21. Ibid.22. Ibid.23. Ibid.24. Brady D Lund, “Public Libraries’ Data Privacy Policies: A Content and Cluster Analysis,” The Serials Librarian 81, no. 1 (2021): 99–107.25. Texas State Library and Archives Commission, “Library Laws and Rules,” https://www.ala.org/asgcla/resources/libraryservices (accessed July 15, 2023).26. See note 1 above.","PeriodicalId":39557,"journal":{"name":"Serials Librarian","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Librarian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526x.2023.2245862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article delves into the complex and inseparable relationship between collection development in libraries and the interconnected factors of privacy, censorship, and government influence. Libraries, as guardians of information and knowledge, constantly strive to update their collections to meet the diverse needs of patrons. However, in doing so, they face intricate challenges that extend beyond merely acquiring materials. This article aims to shed light on the pivotal role librarians play in collection development. It highlights the need for librarians to consider a wide range of factors, both internal and external, before making informed decisions about their collections. By understanding the multifaceted nature of their responsibilities, librarians can better serve their communities and maintain libraries as vital centers for knowledge dissemination. This article ultimately offers insights that can contribute to the enhancement of collection development practices, ensuring libraries remain adaptive, inclusive, and conducive to the pursuit of knowledge in an ever-changing world.KEYWORDS: Privacy in librariescensorshiplegislationintellectual freedomacademic freedom AcknowledgmentsThis article was originally written for INFO5400: Information Resources Development. The author thanks the University of North Texas (College of Information) for this enriching academic experience.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. American Library Association, “Advocacy and Public Policy,” https://www.ala.org/advocacy/federal-resources (accessed July 15, 2023).2. Paula Wittmann and Nancy Fisher-Allison, “Intentionally Creating a Safe Space for All: The School Library as Refuge,” Knowledge Quest 48, no. 3 (2020): 42.3. Lisa Zhao, “Protection of Library Users’ Privacy: An Analysis of US State Laws,” Chinese Librarianship 26, no. 26 (2008): 8.4. Sandra J. Valenti, Brady D. Lund, and Matthew A. Beckstrom, Library Patrons’ Privacy: Questions and Answers (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2022), 11.5. Judith Rauhofer, “Privacy Is Dead, Get over It! Information Privacy and the Dream of a Risk-Free Society,” Information & Communications Technology Law 17, no. 3 (October 2008): 185–97. doi:10.1080/13600830802472990.6. American Library Association, “Privacy,” https://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacy (accessed July 15, 2023).7. Ibid.8. Ibid.9. Debra Lau Whelan, “A Dirty Little Secret: Self-Censorship,” School Library Journal 55, no. 2 (2009): 26–30.10. Ibid.11. Jennifer Downey, “Self-Censorship in Selection of LGBT-Themed Materials,” Reference & User Services Quarterly 53, no. 2 (Winter 2013): 104–107. https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/self-censorship-selection-lgbt-themed-materials/docview/1470878772/se-2.12. Ibid.13. Jennifer Elaine Steele, “Cases of Censorship in Public Libraries: Wichita Falls, TX,” Public Library Quarterly (2019). doi:10.1080/01616846.2019.1692324.14. “Success Stories: Library,” Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom (Online) 64, no. 5 (2015): 160. https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/success-stories-library/docview/1721338503/se-2 (accessed July 15, 2023).15. Zoe (Abbie) Teel, “Discouraging Freedom in the Library,” The Serials Librarian (2023): 1–6.16. Emily Knox, “The Books Will Still Be in the Library: Narrow Definitions of Censorship in the Discourse of Challengers,” Library Trends 62, no. 4 (2014): 740–749.17. See note 9 above.18. Ibid.19. American Library Association, “Challenge Support,” https://www.ala.org/tools/challengesupport (accessed July 15, 2023).20. Ibid.21. Ibid.22. Ibid.23. Ibid.24. Brady D Lund, “Public Libraries’ Data Privacy Policies: A Content and Cluster Analysis,” The Serials Librarian 81, no. 1 (2021): 99–107.25. Texas State Library and Archives Commission, “Library Laws and Rules,” https://www.ala.org/asgcla/resources/libraryservices (accessed July 15, 2023).26. See note 1 above.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由的守护者:审查隐私,审查制度和收集发展中的政府立法
摘要本文探讨了图书馆馆藏发展与隐私、审查、政府影响等相互关联的因素之间复杂而不可分割的关系。图书馆作为信息和知识的守护者,不断努力更新馆藏,以满足读者的不同需要。然而,在这样做的过程中,他们面临着复杂的挑战,不仅仅是获取材料。本文旨在阐明图书馆员在馆藏发展中所起的关键作用。它强调了图书馆员在对馆藏做出明智的决定之前,需要考虑广泛的因素,包括内部和外部因素。通过了解其职责的多面性,图书馆员可以更好地为社区服务,并保持图书馆作为知识传播的重要中心的地位。本文最终提供了有助于加强馆藏发展实践的见解,确保图书馆在不断变化的世界中保持适应性、包容性和对知识的追求。关键词:图书馆隐私、审查、立法、知识自由、学术自由作者感谢北德克萨斯大学(信息学院)提供了丰富的学术经验。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。美国图书馆协会,“倡导和公共政策”,https://www.ala.org/advocacy/federal-resources(2023年7月15日访问)。Paula Wittmann和Nancy Fisher-Allison,“有意为所有人创造一个安全的空间:学校图书馆作为避难所”,《知识探索》第48期,第2期。3(2020): 42.3。赵莉:“图书馆用户隐私的保护:对美国各州法律的分析”,《中国图书馆事业》第26期。26(2008): 8.4。桑德拉·j·瓦伦蒂,布雷迪·d·伦德,马修·a·贝克斯特罗姆,《图书馆顾客的隐私:问题与答案》(加州圣巴巴拉:ABC-CLIO, 2022),第11.5页。Judith Rauhofer,“隐私已死,克服它!”《信息隐私与无风险社会的梦想》,《信息与通信技术法》第17期。(2008年10月):185-97。doi: 10.1080/13600830802472990.6。7.美国图书馆协会,“隐私”https://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacy(访问日期:2023年7月15日)。Ibid.8。Ibid.9。Debra Lau Whelan,“肮脏的小秘密:自我审查”,《学校图书馆杂志》55期,第5期。2(2009): 26-30.10。Ibid.11。Jennifer Downey,“选择lgbt主题材料中的自我审查”,参考与用户服务季刊,第53期。2 (Winter 2013): 104-107。https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=https: / / www.proquest.com/scholarly journals/self——审查——选择——lgbt -主题- materials/docview/1470878772/se - 2.12。Ibid.13。詹妮弗·伊莱恩·斯蒂尔,“审查制度在公共图书馆的案例:威奇托福尔斯,德克萨斯州”,公共图书馆季刊(2019)。doi: 10.1080 / 01616846.2019.1692324.14。《成功的故事:图书馆》,《知识自由通讯》64期。5(2015): 160。https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/success-stories-library/docview/1721338503/se-2(访问日期:2023年7月15日)。Zoe (Abbie) Teel,“图书馆中令人沮丧的自由”,系列图书管理员(2023):1-6.16。艾米丽·诺克斯,《书仍将在图书馆:挑战者话语中审查制度的狭隘定义》,《图书馆趋势》62,第2期。4(2014): 740-749.17。见上面说明9。Ibid.19。20.美国图书馆协会,“挑战支持”https://www.ala.org/tools/challengesupport(2023年7月15日访问)。Ibid.21。Ibid.22。Ibid.23。Ibid.24。“公共图书馆的数据隐私政策:内容和聚类分析”,《图书馆管理》第81期。[j](2021): 99-107.25。德克萨斯州图书馆和档案委员会,“图书馆法律和规则”https://www.ala.org/asgcla/resources/libraryservices(访问2023年7月15日)。26。见上面附注1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Serials Librarian
Serials Librarian Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Serials Librarian is an international journal covering all aspects of the management of serials and other continuing resources in any format—print, electronic, etc.—ranging from their publication, to their abstracting and indexing by commercial services, and their collection and processing by libraries. The journal provides a forum for discussion and innovation for all those involved in the serials information chain, but especially for librarians and other library staff, be they in a single (continuing resources) department or in collection development, acquisitions, cataloging/metadata, or information technology departments.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights: An Interview with Wend Wendland Guardians of Freedom: Examining Privacy, Censorship, and Government Legislation in Collection Development “Harmful to Minors” : How Book Bans Hurt Adolescent Development Changing Tides: A Critical Reflection on Neutrality and Antiracism in LIS Discouraging Freedom in the Library
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1