A comparison of real-world outdoor aging of Bacillus thuringiensis bioaerosols using Goldberg rotating drums and synthetic spider webs in Conroe, Texas
Sean M. Kinahan, Gabriel A. Lucero, Matthew S. Tezak, Kevin Hommema, Paul Gemmer, Eric Scribben, Thomas Hawkyard, Don R. Collins, Kevin K. Crown, Joshua L. Santarpia
求助PDF
{"title":"A comparison of real-world outdoor aging of <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> bioaerosols using Goldberg rotating drums and synthetic spider webs in Conroe, Texas","authors":"Sean M. Kinahan, Gabriel A. Lucero, Matthew S. Tezak, Kevin Hommema, Paul Gemmer, Eric Scribben, Thomas Hawkyard, Don R. Collins, Kevin K. Crown, Joshua L. Santarpia","doi":"10.1080/02786826.2023.2271990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThere are two predominant methods for understanding and studying bioaerosol aging: capture on microfibers, and Goldberg rotating drums. There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach depending on the experimental needs, cost, and timeline, but they have rarely been compared in parallel to determine the similarity of results. Experiments that use Goldberg drums have the advantage of studying aerosol particles in suspension, but due time resolution of aging processes is limited by chamber volume, sample volumes, and aerosol loss mechanisms. For microfiber experiments, particles are adhered to the fiber, and so only simulate natural aerosols, but there are significant advantages since particles are not lost during aging and the time resolution is not limited by sampling. In this study, we compared outdoor UV-transmitting Goldberg rotating drums with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) synthetic spider web material in a complex real-world environment during a summer near Houston, Texas. Bacillus thuringiensis al hakam spores were aerosolized into UV-transmitting, gas-permeable chambers that allowed relevant exposure to real-world atmospheric conditions while isolating particles of interest. Aging was compared for up to 4 h in both sunlight exposed and protected environments to compare and quantify relative degradation rates. The two disparate methodologies yielded similar results, with no statistical difference found in three out of four combinations of carbon-filtered air vs. ambient air, and protection from sunlight vs. exposure to sunlight, but this could vary for other particle sizes or organisms.Copyright © 2023 American Association for Aerosol ResearchEDITOR: Jonathan P. Reid AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Morgan Minyard and Mr. Rick Mathieson for their guidance and technical insight, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Additionally, we acknowledge and thank Dr. James Flynn, and the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Houston for gas-phase measurements and site access, along with the staff at the W.G. Jones State Forest.Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationFundingThe Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) provided the funding for this research (HDTRA1310184).","PeriodicalId":7474,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol Science and Technology","volume":"107 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2271990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
AbstractThere are two predominant methods for understanding and studying bioaerosol aging: capture on microfibers, and Goldberg rotating drums. There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach depending on the experimental needs, cost, and timeline, but they have rarely been compared in parallel to determine the similarity of results. Experiments that use Goldberg drums have the advantage of studying aerosol particles in suspension, but due time resolution of aging processes is limited by chamber volume, sample volumes, and aerosol loss mechanisms. For microfiber experiments, particles are adhered to the fiber, and so only simulate natural aerosols, but there are significant advantages since particles are not lost during aging and the time resolution is not limited by sampling. In this study, we compared outdoor UV-transmitting Goldberg rotating drums with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) synthetic spider web material in a complex real-world environment during a summer near Houston, Texas. Bacillus thuringiensis al hakam spores were aerosolized into UV-transmitting, gas-permeable chambers that allowed relevant exposure to real-world atmospheric conditions while isolating particles of interest. Aging was compared for up to 4 h in both sunlight exposed and protected environments to compare and quantify relative degradation rates. The two disparate methodologies yielded similar results, with no statistical difference found in three out of four combinations of carbon-filtered air vs. ambient air, and protection from sunlight vs. exposure to sunlight, but this could vary for other particle sizes or organisms.Copyright © 2023 American Association for Aerosol ResearchEDITOR: Jonathan P. Reid AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Morgan Minyard and Mr. Rick Mathieson for their guidance and technical insight, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Additionally, we acknowledge and thank Dr. James Flynn, and the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Houston for gas-phase measurements and site access, along with the staff at the W.G. Jones State Forest.Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationFundingThe Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) provided the funding for this research (HDTRA1310184).
在德克萨斯州Conroe使用Goldberg旋转鼓和合成蜘蛛网对苏云金芽孢杆菌生物气溶胶进行室外老化的比较
摘要对生物气溶胶老化的认识和研究主要有两种方法:微纤维捕集法和哥德堡旋转鼓法。根据实验需要、成本和时间,每种方法都有优缺点,但很少将它们并行比较以确定结果的相似性。使用Goldberg鼓的实验在研究悬浮中的气溶胶颗粒方面具有优势,但由于老化过程的时间分辨率受到室体积、样品体积和气溶胶损失机制的限制。对于超细纤维实验,由于颗粒粘附在纤维上,只能模拟天然气溶胶,但由于颗粒不会在老化过程中丢失,且时间分辨率不受采样的限制,具有明显的优势。在这项研究中,我们在德克萨斯州休斯顿附近的一个复杂的现实环境中,比较了户外紫外线传输Goldberg旋转鼓和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)合成蛛网材料。苏云金芽孢杆菌哈卡姆孢子被雾化到紫外线透射,透气性室,允许相关暴露在真实的大气条件下,同时分离感兴趣的颗粒。在阳光照射和受保护的环境中,比较了长达4小时的老化,以比较和量化相对降解率。这两种不同的方法产生了类似的结果,在碳过滤空气与环境空气的四种组合中,有三种没有发现统计差异,以及防晒与暴露在阳光下,但这可能因其他颗粒大小或生物体而异。版权所有©2023美国气溶胶研究协会编辑:Jonathan P. Reid致谢作者要感谢Morgan Minyard博士和Rick Mathieson先生的指导和技术见解,以及国防威胁减少局。此外,我们感谢詹姆斯·弗林博士和休斯敦大学地球与大气科学系的气相测量和现场访问,以及W.G.琼斯州立森林的工作人员。作者报告无利益竞争需要申报。国防威胁减少局(DTRA)为这项研究提供了资金(HDTRA1310184)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。