“Speaking as a mother”: A membership categorisation analysis of child-centric talk in a UK daytime television talk show

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Feminism & Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1177/09593535231173232
Emily Foster, Laura Kilby
{"title":"“Speaking as a mother”: A membership categorisation analysis of child-centric talk in a UK daytime television talk show","authors":"Emily Foster, Laura Kilby","doi":"10.1177/09593535231173232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we explore motherhood as an interactionally emergent identity category that speakers construct and lay claim to in talk, and as a category that is imbued with moral expectations of how incumbents should behave. We analyse 18 child-focussed debates from British daytime television talk show, This Morning. Engaging a postfeminist framework, we use membership categorisation analysis to explore how, and to what effect, women deploy claims to motherhood. We report three main findings: (a) Speakers routinely quantify their motherhood credentials in the development of a “mother-cum-expert” identity; (b) speakers who construct motherhood in accordance with neoliberal norms of “good motherhood” habitually trump the arguments offered by other speakers, including those with professional expertise; (c) any challenge to essentialist norms of womanhood and/or motherhood become accountable matters. We conclude that whilst there is power in motherhood insomuch as it vests some women with expertise and elevates their rights to be heard on child-focussed matters, the speakers in our study nevertheless construct motherhood in a manner that (re)produces and elevates essentialised notions of gender and narrow versions of motherhood.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminism & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535231173232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we explore motherhood as an interactionally emergent identity category that speakers construct and lay claim to in talk, and as a category that is imbued with moral expectations of how incumbents should behave. We analyse 18 child-focussed debates from British daytime television talk show, This Morning. Engaging a postfeminist framework, we use membership categorisation analysis to explore how, and to what effect, women deploy claims to motherhood. We report three main findings: (a) Speakers routinely quantify their motherhood credentials in the development of a “mother-cum-expert” identity; (b) speakers who construct motherhood in accordance with neoliberal norms of “good motherhood” habitually trump the arguments offered by other speakers, including those with professional expertise; (c) any challenge to essentialist norms of womanhood and/or motherhood become accountable matters. We conclude that whilst there is power in motherhood insomuch as it vests some women with expertise and elevates their rights to be heard on child-focussed matters, the speakers in our study nevertheless construct motherhood in a manner that (re)produces and elevates essentialised notions of gender and narrow versions of motherhood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“以母亲的身份说话”:英国日间电视脱口秀中以儿童为中心的谈话的会员分类分析
在本研究中,我们探讨了母性作为说话者在谈话中构建和声称的一个互动涌现的身份类别,以及作为一个充满了在职者应该如何表现的道德期望的类别。我们分析了英国日间电视脱口秀《今晨》中18场以儿童为中心的辩论。采用后女权主义框架,我们使用成员分类分析来探索女性如何以及在何种程度上部署母亲身份。我们报告了三个主要发现:(a)发言者在发展“母亲兼专家”身份时经常量化其母亲资格;(b)根据新自由主义的“好母亲”规范来构建母性的发言者,习惯性地胜过其他发言者的论点,包括那些具有专业知识的发言者;(c)对妇女和/或母性本质主义规范的任何挑战都应负责任。我们的结论是,虽然母性有力量,因为它赋予了一些妇女专业知识,并提高了她们在以儿童为中心的问题上的发言权,但我们研究中的发言者仍然以一种(重新)产生和提升性别本质概念和狭隘版本的母性的方式构建母性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Feminism & Psychology provides a forum for debate at the interface between feminism and psychology. The journal"s principal aim is to foster the development of feminist theory and practice in – and beyond – psychology. It publishes high-quality original research, theoretical articles, and commentaries. We are interested in pieces that provide insights into the gendered reality of everyday lives, especially in relation to women and girls, as well as pieces that address broader theoretical issues. Feminism & Psychology seeks to publish work from scholars, researchers, activists and practitioners at all stages of their careers who share a feminist analysis of the overlapping domains of gender and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Thanks to guest editors, manuscript reviewers, and student presentation reviewers Social work with young women in security emergencies: An autoethnography of epistemic resistance Porridge and misogyny: Rationalising inconspicuous misogyny in morning television shows Disability, trauma, and the place of affect in identity: Examining performativity in visual impairment rehabilitation Book Review: Lady sapiens: Breaking stereotypes about prehistoric women by Thomas Cirotteau, Jennifer Kerner, and Éric Pincas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1