Personal Income Tax Deductions and Demand for Education: Case of Russia

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Tax Reform Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.134
Anna P. Kireenko, Tatyana Y. Krasikova
{"title":"Personal Income Tax Deductions and Demand for Education: Case of Russia","authors":"Anna P. Kireenko, Tatyana Y. Krasikova","doi":"10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax system creates various incentive effects that can influence an individual’s educational choice. Many studies have been conducted on the effect of tax incentives on education, however, no study that reveals such an effect has been conducted in Russia. With this in mind, we aimed to analyse whether the tax incentives for education influence the household’s decisions to receive an education in Russia. In this context, we analysed the correlation between the number of individuals who received tax deductions and the number of individuals who received education by regions of the Russian Federation. The data source was tax reporting data of Federal Tax Service and the 2020 census data. The research methodology includes methods of regression and correlation analysis. The results show that tax incentives for education have low impact on the of household’s decisions to receive an education in the Russian Federation. Tax deduction has a stable but weak positive association with total numbers of students. The calculated parameters of the model explain the dependence between the deduction for expenses for own education and quantity of people who receive education by 9.2% and dependence between the deduction for expenses for full-time education of children and quantity of people who receive education by 5.5%. There is low probability that the announced rise of the limit of social deduction in 2024 will change the situation. But government should continue to provide federal funding through tax benefits to promote voluntary compliance by fostering favourable taxpayer views of the tax system.","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tax system creates various incentive effects that can influence an individual’s educational choice. Many studies have been conducted on the effect of tax incentives on education, however, no study that reveals such an effect has been conducted in Russia. With this in mind, we aimed to analyse whether the tax incentives for education influence the household’s decisions to receive an education in Russia. In this context, we analysed the correlation between the number of individuals who received tax deductions and the number of individuals who received education by regions of the Russian Federation. The data source was tax reporting data of Federal Tax Service and the 2020 census data. The research methodology includes methods of regression and correlation analysis. The results show that tax incentives for education have low impact on the of household’s decisions to receive an education in the Russian Federation. Tax deduction has a stable but weak positive association with total numbers of students. The calculated parameters of the model explain the dependence between the deduction for expenses for own education and quantity of people who receive education by 9.2% and dependence between the deduction for expenses for full-time education of children and quantity of people who receive education by 5.5%. There is low probability that the announced rise of the limit of social deduction in 2024 will change the situation. But government should continue to provide federal funding through tax benefits to promote voluntary compliance by fostering favourable taxpayer views of the tax system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人所得税减免与教育需求:以俄罗斯为例
税收制度产生各种激励效应,可以影响个人的教育选择。关于税收优惠对教育的影响已经进行了许多研究,但在俄罗斯没有进行过这样的研究。考虑到这一点,我们的目的是分析教育税收优惠是否会影响家庭在俄罗斯接受教育的决定。在这方面,我们分析了俄罗斯联邦各地区接受税收减免的个人人数与接受教育的个人人数之间的相关性。数据来源为联邦税务局纳税申报数据和2020年人口普查数据。研究方法包括回归分析和相关分析。结果表明,教育税收优惠对俄罗斯联邦家庭接受教育的决定影响较小。税收减免与学生总数呈稳定但微弱的正相关关系。模型计算参数解释了自身教育费用扣除与受教育人数的依赖关系为9.2%,子女全日制教育费用扣除与受教育人数的依赖关系为5.5%。虽然已宣布在2024年提高社会扣除限额,但改变这种状况的可能性很小。但政府应继续通过税收优惠提供联邦资金,通过培养纳税人对税收制度的好感来促进自愿遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
MSMEs Tax Compliance in Indonesia During Pandemic COVID-19: The Role of Risk Preference as Moderation The influence of foreign ownership on tax avoidance in Thailand: A study from an emerging economy Rationality of the Tax and Economic Behavior of Enterprises in the Russian Forestry Sector Economic Growth and Optimal Tax Burden: A Case of Uzbekistan’s Economy The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1