The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Tax Reform Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.126
A. Pugachev
{"title":"The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia","authors":"A. Pugachev","doi":"10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to consider the effects of indirect taxes, VAT in particular, on inequality. The study tests the hypothesis that indirect taxation in Russia does not have a significant impact on inequality but has a potential to reduce it. Methodologically, the study relies on correlation regression analysis, time series analysis, structural analysis and the index method. The data used for the analysis are provided by the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) and Federal Tax Service for the period from 1992 to 2021. Calculations were conducted with the help of Data Analysis ToolPak in MS Excel. A classification of the types of economic inequality is proposed together with the corresponding fiscal instruments used to tackle each type. Indirect taxes are considered to be capable of reducing consumption inequality. To evaluate the influence of indirect taxation on inequality, the following parameters were considered: VAT-to-GDP ratio and the share of VAT in total tax revenues of the consolidated budget, share of revenue raised through 10% VAT in the total volume of VAT, and the decile ratio of consumption spending. It was found that indirect taxes in Russia do not have a significant impact on inequality. Although in some years VAT receipts accounted for a larger share in total tax revenues and in GDP and this trend was accompanied by lower levels of inequality, this happened because of the influence of other factors, for example, the use of the progressive scale of the personal income tax in the 1990s. To reduce inequality, a viable solution for the government would be to apply a system of differentiated VAT rates to balance disparities in consumption of the wealthiest and poorest households (these differences are reflected in Rosstat data on consumption). Moreover, since utilities, telecommunications and food constitute up to 70% of the poor’s expenditures, it would make sense to lower the VAT rate for these categories of goods and services while raising the rate for such categories as hospitality services, cafes and restaurants, recreation and leisure services because in total, these categories account for 13.2% of the expenditures of the wealthiest households. Unfortunately, in 2022, the government took the decision to apply zero-rated VAT to these services as part of the anti-crisis program.","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to consider the effects of indirect taxes, VAT in particular, on inequality. The study tests the hypothesis that indirect taxation in Russia does not have a significant impact on inequality but has a potential to reduce it. Methodologically, the study relies on correlation regression analysis, time series analysis, structural analysis and the index method. The data used for the analysis are provided by the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) and Federal Tax Service for the period from 1992 to 2021. Calculations were conducted with the help of Data Analysis ToolPak in MS Excel. A classification of the types of economic inequality is proposed together with the corresponding fiscal instruments used to tackle each type. Indirect taxes are considered to be capable of reducing consumption inequality. To evaluate the influence of indirect taxation on inequality, the following parameters were considered: VAT-to-GDP ratio and the share of VAT in total tax revenues of the consolidated budget, share of revenue raised through 10% VAT in the total volume of VAT, and the decile ratio of consumption spending. It was found that indirect taxes in Russia do not have a significant impact on inequality. Although in some years VAT receipts accounted for a larger share in total tax revenues and in GDP and this trend was accompanied by lower levels of inequality, this happened because of the influence of other factors, for example, the use of the progressive scale of the personal income tax in the 1990s. To reduce inequality, a viable solution for the government would be to apply a system of differentiated VAT rates to balance disparities in consumption of the wealthiest and poorest households (these differences are reflected in Rosstat data on consumption). Moreover, since utilities, telecommunications and food constitute up to 70% of the poor’s expenditures, it would make sense to lower the VAT rate for these categories of goods and services while raising the rate for such categories as hospitality services, cafes and restaurants, recreation and leisure services because in total, these categories account for 13.2% of the expenditures of the wealthiest households. Unfortunately, in 2022, the government took the decision to apply zero-rated VAT to these services as part of the anti-crisis program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间接税对俄罗斯不平等的影响
本研究的目的是考虑间接税,特别是增值税对不平等的影响。这项研究检验了一个假设,即俄罗斯的间接税对不平等没有显著影响,但有可能减少不平等。在方法上,采用了相关回归分析、时间序列分析、结构分析和指数法。用于分析的数据由联邦国家统计局(Rosstat)和联邦税务局提供,时间为1992年至2021年。利用MS Excel中的Data Analysis ToolPak进行计算。对经济不平等的类型进行了分类,并提出了用于解决每种类型的相应财政工具。间接税被认为能够减少消费不平等。为了评估间接税对不平等的影响,我们考虑了以下参数:增值税与gdp的比率和增值税在综合预算税收总额中的份额,通过10%增值税增加的收入在增值税总额中的份额,以及消费支出的十分位数比率。研究发现,俄罗斯的间接税对不平等没有显著影响。虽然在某些年份,增值税收入在税收总额和国内生产总值中所占的份额较大,而且这一趋势伴随着不平等程度的降低,但这是由于其他因素的影响,例如,在1990年代使用了个人所得税的累进比例制。为了减少不平等,对政府来说,一个可行的解决方案是采用差别增值税税率制度,以平衡最富裕和最贫穷家庭的消费差异(这些差异反映在俄罗斯统计局的消费数据中)。此外,由于公用事业、电信和食品占穷人支出的70%,降低这些类别的商品和服务的增值税率,同时提高酒店服务、咖啡馆和餐馆、娱乐和休闲服务等类别的税率是有道理的,因为这些类别总共占最富裕家庭支出的13.2%。不幸的是,在2022年,作为反危机计划的一部分,政府决定对这些服务征收零税率的增值税。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
MSMEs Tax Compliance in Indonesia During Pandemic COVID-19: The Role of Risk Preference as Moderation The influence of foreign ownership on tax avoidance in Thailand: A study from an emerging economy Rationality of the Tax and Economic Behavior of Enterprises in the Russian Forestry Sector Economic Growth and Optimal Tax Burden: A Case of Uzbekistan’s Economy The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1