{"title":"Have the pilot carbon markets achieved synergistic control of carbon abatement and pollution reduction? The quasi-experimental evidence from China","authors":"Tiantian Yang, Lan Yi, Jing Li, Qingquan Liang","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231201535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Chinese government has emphasized the necessity of synergistic control for carbon abatement and pollution reduction in the protection of eco-environment, as part of the 14th Five-Year Plan and the Long-range Objectives Through the Year 2035. As an important tool to reduce CO 2 , the carbon market can also affect the air pollution synergistically. The study utilizes the multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) model to analyze the impact of carbon market on carbon abatement, as well as the synergistic effect on different air pollutants. The study analyzes the mechanisms for carbon market to achieve synergistic control from the perspectives of “quantity” and “category” comprehensively. The findings indicate that: (1) carbon markets can reduce CO 2 significantly, with a synergistic effect mainly observed on SO 2 and soot (dust). These results remain robust when focusing on the industrial sector or adopting the PSM-DID estimation, etc.; (2) the mechanisms to achieve synergistic control vary among different air pollutants. Promotion of technology can only synergistically reduce SO 2 . Optimization of energy consumption structure is the top priority for reducing CO 2 . The most effective mechanism to achieve synergistic control of air pollutants is improvement of energy utilization efficiency; (3) to achieve synergistic control goals, the Chinese national market should prioritize industries that release both CO 2 and NOx in the rolling-out plan, enrich the trading tools, and formulate effective price signals.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231201535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Chinese government has emphasized the necessity of synergistic control for carbon abatement and pollution reduction in the protection of eco-environment, as part of the 14th Five-Year Plan and the Long-range Objectives Through the Year 2035. As an important tool to reduce CO 2 , the carbon market can also affect the air pollution synergistically. The study utilizes the multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) model to analyze the impact of carbon market on carbon abatement, as well as the synergistic effect on different air pollutants. The study analyzes the mechanisms for carbon market to achieve synergistic control from the perspectives of “quantity” and “category” comprehensively. The findings indicate that: (1) carbon markets can reduce CO 2 significantly, with a synergistic effect mainly observed on SO 2 and soot (dust). These results remain robust when focusing on the industrial sector or adopting the PSM-DID estimation, etc.; (2) the mechanisms to achieve synergistic control vary among different air pollutants. Promotion of technology can only synergistically reduce SO 2 . Optimization of energy consumption structure is the top priority for reducing CO 2 . The most effective mechanism to achieve synergistic control of air pollutants is improvement of energy utilization efficiency; (3) to achieve synergistic control goals, the Chinese national market should prioritize industries that release both CO 2 and NOx in the rolling-out plan, enrich the trading tools, and formulate effective price signals.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.