The Images of the Nation in Migrant Social Media: А Comparative Analysis of VKontakte Groups from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan

IF 0.1 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21638/spbu13.2023.212
Natalia D. Tregubova, Alexander M. Stepanov, Pavel P. Lisitsyn
{"title":"The Images of the Nation in Migrant Social Media: А Comparative Analysis of VKontakte Groups from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan","authors":"Natalia D. Tregubova, Alexander M. Stepanov, Pavel P. Lisitsyn","doi":"10.21638/spbu13.2023.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the results of a study that is part of a broader project aimed at analyzing online activities of migrants to Russia from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. This research lies at the intersection of migration studies and nationalism studies. The authors seek to characterize the images of the nation and related discussions in online communities on migration topics. The focus of empirical analysis is five VKontakte groups discussing various news and stories about the country of origin, including news on migration to Russia. The methods are online observation supplemented by discourse analysis of posts and comments. The authors aim to answer the following questions: How do the participants construct the images of the nation? What is debatable and what is in consensus? How are the images of the nation and Islam related? How is migration to Russia characterized? Basing on empirical analysis, the authors characterize three images of the nation: “modernizing state” (Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan), “Muslim nation, but not Islamic state” (Tajikistan and Uzbekistan), “nation united by common enemies” (Azerbaijan). For the first one, the main sources of tension are class divisions and vectors of nation’s development. For the second one, Islam is considered as an important part of the national culture, and there are discussions, which type of identity, national or religious, is more significant. The third image is characterized by internal divisions which lose their importance in the face of the external enemy. In conclusion the authors discuss implications of research results for understanding migration processes in the post-Soviet space, including radicalization of migrants.","PeriodicalId":40378,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2023.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a study that is part of a broader project aimed at analyzing online activities of migrants to Russia from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. This research lies at the intersection of migration studies and nationalism studies. The authors seek to characterize the images of the nation and related discussions in online communities on migration topics. The focus of empirical analysis is five VKontakte groups discussing various news and stories about the country of origin, including news on migration to Russia. The methods are online observation supplemented by discourse analysis of posts and comments. The authors aim to answer the following questions: How do the participants construct the images of the nation? What is debatable and what is in consensus? How are the images of the nation and Islam related? How is migration to Russia characterized? Basing on empirical analysis, the authors characterize three images of the nation: “modernizing state” (Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan), “Muslim nation, but not Islamic state” (Tajikistan and Uzbekistan), “nation united by common enemies” (Azerbaijan). For the first one, the main sources of tension are class divisions and vectors of nation’s development. For the second one, Islam is considered as an important part of the national culture, and there are discussions, which type of identity, national or religious, is more significant. The third image is characterized by internal divisions which lose their importance in the face of the external enemy. In conclusion the authors discuss implications of research results for understanding migration processes in the post-Soviet space, including radicalization of migrants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民社交媒体中的国家形象:А阿塞拜疆、哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦、塔吉克斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦VKontakte群体的比较分析
本文介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究是一个更广泛的项目的一部分,该项目旨在分析来自阿塞拜疆、哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦、塔吉克斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦的俄罗斯移民的在线活动。这项研究是移民研究和民族主义研究的交叉。作者试图描述这个国家的形象以及在线社区关于移民主题的相关讨论。实证分析的重点是五个VKontakte小组,讨论有关原籍国的各种新闻和故事,包括移民到俄罗斯的新闻。方法为网络观察为主,文章评论语篇分析为辅。作者旨在回答以下问题:参与者如何构建国家形象?什么是有争议的,什么是一致的?国家和伊斯兰教的形象是如何联系在一起的?移民到俄罗斯的特点是什么?在实证分析的基础上,作者描绘了三种民族形象:“现代化国家”(哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦)、“穆斯林国家,但不是伊斯兰国家”(塔吉克斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦)、“由共同敌人团结的民族”(阿塞拜疆)。对于第一种,紧张的主要来源是阶级划分和国家发展的载体。对于第二种,伊斯兰教被认为是民族文化的重要组成部分,并有讨论,哪一种身份,民族或宗教,更重要。第三种形象的特点是内部分裂,在面对外部敌人时失去了重要性。最后,作者讨论了研究结果对理解后苏联空间的移民过程的影响,包括移民的激进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Sources of Figurenlehren of the Baroque Era in Musicology of the German Language Space Reproduction Technology. From Replica to Brand The Pragmatics of Romanticism. Edmund Burke as Art Theorist The Pavan in English Music of the 16th–17th Centuries Tapestry Art in Buryatia: Experience and Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1