Promoting the Apocalypse? The Legality of a Ban on Advertising for Fossil Fuels and Other Carbon-Intensive Products under European Law

IF 2.3 Q1 LAW European Journal of Risk Regulation Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1017/err.2023.54
Clemens Kaupa
{"title":"Promoting the Apocalypse? The Legality of a Ban on Advertising for Fossil Fuels and Other Carbon-Intensive Products under European Law","authors":"Clemens Kaupa","doi":"10.1017/err.2023.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Climate policy requires a steep and rapid reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, which are mainly caused by fossil fuels. Advertising that promotes fossil fuels and other carbon-intensive products undermines this objective. It normalises unsustainable consumption patterns and enables producers of harmful commodities to manipulate public discourse in order to delay or derail the energy transition – for example, by spreading misinformation, deflecting responsibility and promoting false solutions. For these reasons, there are increasing calls for a fossil fuel advertising ban along the lines of the tobacco advertising ban at both the European and the Member State level. This article evaluates the legality of such bans under European law, focusing on legislative competence, fundamental rights and internal market law. It finds that a fossil fuel advertising ban can be assumed to conform to the requirements of European law, especially if it is modelled after the tobacco advertising ban.","PeriodicalId":46207,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Risk Regulation","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Risk Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Climate policy requires a steep and rapid reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, which are mainly caused by fossil fuels. Advertising that promotes fossil fuels and other carbon-intensive products undermines this objective. It normalises unsustainable consumption patterns and enables producers of harmful commodities to manipulate public discourse in order to delay or derail the energy transition – for example, by spreading misinformation, deflecting responsibility and promoting false solutions. For these reasons, there are increasing calls for a fossil fuel advertising ban along the lines of the tobacco advertising ban at both the European and the Member State level. This article evaluates the legality of such bans under European law, focusing on legislative competence, fundamental rights and internal market law. It finds that a fossil fuel advertising ban can be assumed to conform to the requirements of European law, especially if it is modelled after the tobacco advertising ban.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宣传世界末日?根据欧洲法律禁止化石燃料和其他碳密集型产品广告的合法性
气候政策要求大幅快速减少温室气体排放,而温室气体排放主要是由化石燃料引起的。宣传化石燃料和其他碳密集型产品的广告破坏了这一目标。它使不可持续的消费模式正常化,并使有害商品的生产者能够操纵公众话语,以推迟或破坏能源转型——例如,通过传播错误信息、转移责任和推广错误的解决方案。由于这些原因,越来越多的人呼吁在欧洲和成员国一级按照禁止烟草广告的方式禁止化石燃料广告。本文从立法权限、基本权利和内部市场法律三个方面对欧洲法律下此类禁令的合法性进行了评估。它发现,化石燃料广告禁令可以被认为符合欧洲法律的要求,特别是如果它是模仿烟草广告禁令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: European Journal of Risk Regulation is an interdisciplinary forum bringing together legal practitioners, academics, risk analysts and policymakers in a dialogue on how risks to individuals’ health, safety and the environment are regulated across policy domains globally. The journal’s wide scope encourages exploration of public health, safety and environmental aspects of pharmaceuticals, food and other consumer products alongside a wider interpretation of risk, which includes financial regulation, technology-related risks, natural disasters and terrorism.
期刊最新文献
Management and Enforcement Theories for Compliance with the Rule of Law A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities Standards for Including Scientific Evidence in Restrictions on Freedom of Movement: The Case of EU Covid Certificates Scheme Collaborative Governance Structures for Interoperability in the EU’s new data acts Dangerous Legacy of Food Contact Materials on the EU Market: Recall of Products Containing PFAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1