Ethics and IPR - Much Needed Legal Solutions for Tomorrow

{"title":"Ethics and IPR - Much Needed Legal Solutions for Tomorrow","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i6.1917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the protection of authorship in scientific papers. We analysed the role of authorship in the light ofthe current legal and ethical framework. We have discovered that standard rules of copyright law refer to the relationshipbetween the 'author' and the result of their creative activity. 'Authors' are not originators of a discovery, idea, procedure,theory, method or other immaterial contribution to research unless they have fixed the intellectual work in any tangiblemedium of expression. At times, it is challenging to identify scientific products, which are an essential contribution toresearch projects, which means that copyright law might not protect them. These two contexts, modern science andcopyright law, allow us to conclude that ethical codes for researchers properly define the right to be an author of a scientificpaper. The study aims to clarify that (1) international human rights guarantee the protection of the author's moral rights ofthe original contribution to the research project, (2) this obligation is not implemented correctly by national legislators, (3)national legislators' task is to create an adequate legal protection system for original contributions to research scienceaccording to the example of the solutions adopted by the German legislator.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"37 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i6.1917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the protection of authorship in scientific papers. We analysed the role of authorship in the light ofthe current legal and ethical framework. We have discovered that standard rules of copyright law refer to the relationshipbetween the 'author' and the result of their creative activity. 'Authors' are not originators of a discovery, idea, procedure,theory, method or other immaterial contribution to research unless they have fixed the intellectual work in any tangiblemedium of expression. At times, it is challenging to identify scientific products, which are an essential contribution toresearch projects, which means that copyright law might not protect them. These two contexts, modern science andcopyright law, allow us to conclude that ethical codes for researchers properly define the right to be an author of a scientificpaper. The study aims to clarify that (1) international human rights guarantee the protection of the author's moral rights ofthe original contribution to the research project, (2) this obligation is not implemented correctly by national legislators, (3)national legislators' task is to create an adequate legal protection system for original contributions to research scienceaccording to the example of the solutions adopted by the German legislator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道德与知识产权——未来急需的法律解决方案
本文探讨了科技论文作者身份的保护问题。我们根据当前的法律和伦理框架分析了作者身份的作用。我们已经发现,版权法的标准规则是指“作者”与其创作活动的结果之间的关系。“作者”不是发现、想法、程序、理论、方法或其他非物质研究贡献的创始者,除非他们将智力工作固定在任何有形的表达媒介中。有时,识别对研究项目有重要贡献的科学产品是一项挑战,这意味着版权法可能无法保护它们。现代科学和版权法这两个背景使我们能够得出结论,研究人员的伦理准则恰当地定义了作为科学论文作者的权利。本研究旨在阐明:(1)国际人权保障对研究项目原创性贡献作者的精神权利的保护;(2)国家立法者没有正确履行这一义务;(3)国家立法者的任务是为研究科学的原创性贡献建立一个适当的法律保护制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The Interplay between Contemporary Art and Copyright Law Ethics and IPR - Much Needed Legal Solutions for Tomorrow Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Third Decade of Twenty-First Century (2020–2023) — VI Economic Justification of Traditional knowledge with Insights from Identity Economics Pre-Grant Opposition: CSIR v Ms Hindustan Lever Limited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1