Unraveling Microbial Endosymbiosis Dynamics in Plant-Parasitic Nematodes with a Genome Skimming Strategy

Sulochana K. Wasala, Cedar Hesse, Catherine L. Wram, Dana K. Howe, Inga A. Zasada, Dee R. Denver
{"title":"Unraveling Microbial Endosymbiosis Dynamics in Plant-Parasitic Nematodes with a Genome Skimming Strategy","authors":"Sulochana K. Wasala, Cedar Hesse, Catherine L. Wram, Dana K. Howe, Inga A. Zasada, Dee R. Denver","doi":"10.3390/applmicrobiol3040085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial endosymbionts, in genera Wolbachia and Cardinium, infect various arthropods and some nematode groups. Manipulating these microbial symbionts presents a promising biocontrol strategy for managing disease-causing parasites. However, the diversity of Wolbachia and Cardinium in nematodes remains unclear. This study employed a genome skimming strategy to uncover their occurrence in plant-parasitic nematodes, analyzing 52 populations of 12 species. A metagenome analysis revealed varying endosymbiont genome content, leading to the categorization of strong, weak, and no evidence for endosymbiont genomes. Strong evidence for Wolbachia was found in five populations, and for Cardinium in one population, suggesting a limited occurrence. Strong Wolbachia evidence was noted in Pratylenchus penetrans and Radopholus similis from North/South America and Africa. Heterodera glycines from North America showed strong Cardinium evidence. Weak genomic evidence for Wolbachia was observed in Globodera pallida, Meloidogyne incognita, Rotylenchus reniformis, Pratylechus coffeae, Pratylenchus neglectus, and Pratylenchus thornei; for Cardinium was found in G. pallida, R. reniformis and P. neglectus; 27/52 populations exhibited no endosymbiont evidence. Wolbachia and Cardinium presence varied within nematode species, suggesting non-obligate mutualism. Wolbachia and Cardinium genomes differed among nematode species, indicating potential species-specific functionality. This study advances knowledge of plant-parasitic nematode–bacteria symbiosis, providing insights for downstream eco-friendly biocontrol strategies.","PeriodicalId":8080,"journal":{"name":"Applied microbiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol3040085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacterial endosymbionts, in genera Wolbachia and Cardinium, infect various arthropods and some nematode groups. Manipulating these microbial symbionts presents a promising biocontrol strategy for managing disease-causing parasites. However, the diversity of Wolbachia and Cardinium in nematodes remains unclear. This study employed a genome skimming strategy to uncover their occurrence in plant-parasitic nematodes, analyzing 52 populations of 12 species. A metagenome analysis revealed varying endosymbiont genome content, leading to the categorization of strong, weak, and no evidence for endosymbiont genomes. Strong evidence for Wolbachia was found in five populations, and for Cardinium in one population, suggesting a limited occurrence. Strong Wolbachia evidence was noted in Pratylenchus penetrans and Radopholus similis from North/South America and Africa. Heterodera glycines from North America showed strong Cardinium evidence. Weak genomic evidence for Wolbachia was observed in Globodera pallida, Meloidogyne incognita, Rotylenchus reniformis, Pratylechus coffeae, Pratylenchus neglectus, and Pratylenchus thornei; for Cardinium was found in G. pallida, R. reniformis and P. neglectus; 27/52 populations exhibited no endosymbiont evidence. Wolbachia and Cardinium presence varied within nematode species, suggesting non-obligate mutualism. Wolbachia and Cardinium genomes differed among nematode species, indicating potential species-specific functionality. This study advances knowledge of plant-parasitic nematode–bacteria symbiosis, providing insights for downstream eco-friendly biocontrol strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基因组略读策略揭示植物-寄生线虫的微生物内共生动力学
Wolbachia属和Cardinium属的细菌内共生体感染各种节肢动物和一些线虫群。控制这些微生物共生体为管理致病寄生虫提供了一种有前途的生物防治策略。然而,沃尔巴克氏体和基数线虫的多样性仍不清楚。本研究采用基因组略读策略,分析了12种植物寄生线虫的52个种群,揭示了它们在植物寄生线虫中的存在。宏基因组分析揭示了不同的内共生体基因组含量,导致了内共生体基因组的强、弱和无证据分类。在五个种群中发现了沃尔巴克氏体的有力证据,在一个种群中发现了红衣主教,这表明它的发病率有限。在北美/南美和非洲的外突扇尾龙和相似雷龙中发现了强烈的沃尔巴克氏体证据。来自北美的异源类甘氨酸显示出很强的基数证据。沃尔巴克氏体存在的基因组证据较弱,在苍白球虱、不认识的长尾舌虱、肾状舌虱、咖啡舌虱、忽略舌虱和刺状舌虱中均有发现;红雀属主要分布于苍白石斛、reniformis和忽略石斛中;27/52个种群未发现内共生证据。沃尔巴克氏体和红基数在线虫种类中存在差异,表明非专性互惠关系。沃尔巴克氏体和基数线虫的基因组在线虫物种之间存在差异,这表明它们具有潜在的物种特异性功能。本研究促进了对植物-寄生线虫-细菌共生关系的认识,为下游生态友好型生物防治策略提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production of Functional Vinegar Enriched with γ-Aminobutyric Acid through Serial Co-Fermentation of Lactic Acid and Acetic Acid Bacteria Using Rice Wine Lees Genomic Characterization of Selected Escherichia coli Strains from Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Nigeria Metatranscriptomic Analysis of Argentinian Kefirs Varying in Apparent Viscosity Multiplex-PCR Detection of an Atypical Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. jonggajibkimchii Phenotype Dominating the Terminal Spoilage Microbial Association of a Fresh Greek Whey Cheese Stored at 4 °C in Vacuum Interaction between Trichoderma sp., Pseudomonas putida, and Two Organic Amendments on the Yield and Quality of Strawberries (Fragaria x annanasa cv. San Andreas) in the Huaral Region, Peru
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1