Numerical Analysis of Gas Hold-Up of Two-Phase Ebullated Bed Reactor

IF 2.8 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL ChemEngineering Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.3390/chemengineering7050101
Riyadh S. Almukhtar, Ali Amer Yahya, Omar S. Mahdy, Hasan Shakir Majdi, Gaidaa S. Mahdi, Asawer A. Alwasiti, Zainab Y. Shnain, Majid Mohammadi, Adnan A. AbdulRazak, Peter Philib, Jamal M. Ali, Haydar A. S. Aljaafari, Sajda S. Alsaedi
{"title":"Numerical Analysis of Gas Hold-Up of Two-Phase Ebullated Bed Reactor","authors":"Riyadh S. Almukhtar, Ali Amer Yahya, Omar S. Mahdy, Hasan Shakir Majdi, Gaidaa S. Mahdi, Asawer A. Alwasiti, Zainab Y. Shnain, Majid Mohammadi, Adnan A. AbdulRazak, Peter Philib, Jamal M. Ali, Haydar A. S. Aljaafari, Sajda S. Alsaedi","doi":"10.3390/chemengineering7050101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the significant increase in heavy feedstocks being transported to refineries and the hydrocracking process, the significance of adopting an ebullated bed reactor has been reemphasized in recent years. The predictive modelling of gas hold-up in an ebullated two-phase reactor was performed using 10 machine learning methods based on support vector machine (SVM) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) in this study. In an ebullated bed reactor, the impacts of three features, namely liquid velocity, gas velocity, and recycling ratio, on the gas hold-up were examined. The liquid velocity has the most impact on the predicted gas hold-up, according to the feature significance analysis. The rotational-quadratic, squared-exponential, Matern 5/2, and exponential kernel functions integrated with the GPR models and the linear, quadratic, cubic, fine, medium, and coarse kernel functions integrated with the SVM model performed well during training and testing, with the exception of the fine SVM model, whose R2 is very low. According to the R2 > 0.9 and low RMSE and MAE values, the rotational-quadratic, squared-exponential, and Matern 5/2 GPR models performed the best.","PeriodicalId":9755,"journal":{"name":"ChemEngineering","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemEngineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering7050101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the significant increase in heavy feedstocks being transported to refineries and the hydrocracking process, the significance of adopting an ebullated bed reactor has been reemphasized in recent years. The predictive modelling of gas hold-up in an ebullated two-phase reactor was performed using 10 machine learning methods based on support vector machine (SVM) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) in this study. In an ebullated bed reactor, the impacts of three features, namely liquid velocity, gas velocity, and recycling ratio, on the gas hold-up were examined. The liquid velocity has the most impact on the predicted gas hold-up, according to the feature significance analysis. The rotational-quadratic, squared-exponential, Matern 5/2, and exponential kernel functions integrated with the GPR models and the linear, quadratic, cubic, fine, medium, and coarse kernel functions integrated with the SVM model performed well during training and testing, with the exception of the fine SVM model, whose R2 is very low. According to the R2 > 0.9 and low RMSE and MAE values, the rotational-quadratic, squared-exponential, and Matern 5/2 GPR models performed the best.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两相沸腾床反应器气含率的数值分析
由于输送到炼油厂和加氢裂化过程的重质原料的显著增加,近年来采用膨胀床反应器的重要性再次得到强调。采用基于支持向量机(SVM)和高斯过程回归(GPR)的10种机器学习方法对气相反应器气含率进行了预测建模。在膨胀床反应器中,考察了液速、气速和再循环比三个特征对气含率的影响。根据特征显著性分析,液速对预测含气率影响最大。与GPR模型集成的旋转二次核函数、平方指数核函数、Matern 5/2核函数和指数核函数以及与SVM模型集成的线性核函数、二次核函数、三次核函数、精细核函数、中核函数和粗核函数在训练和测试中都表现良好,但精细核函数的R2很低。根据R2 >0.9和低RMSE和MAE值时,旋转二次型、平方指数型和Matern 5/2型GPR模型表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ChemEngineering
ChemEngineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Catalysts Based on Iron Oxides for Wastewater Purification from Phenolic Compounds: Synthesis, Physicochemical Analysis, Determination of Catalytic Activity Effect of Inserting Baffles on the Solid Particle Segregation Behavior in Fluidized Bed Reactor: A Computational Study Force Field for Calculation of the Vapor-Liquid Phase Equilibrium of trans-Decalin Antisolvent Crystallization of Papain Ultrafiltration to Increase the Consistency of Fruit Pulps: The Role of Permeate Flux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1