The Africa paradox: Locating Africa in eighteenth-century studies

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Literature Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1111/lic3.12749
Rebekah Mitsein
{"title":"The Africa paradox: Locating Africa in eighteenth-century studies","authors":"Rebekah Mitsein","doi":"10.1111/lic3.12749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is about why Africa is overlooked in eighteenth-century literary studies. Africa’s neglect is not merely a problem of attention. Neither the parameters of the field nor the tools of the discipline appear particularly suited for engaging Africa as anything other than an invention of the European imagination. In what follows, I seek to bring more clarity to the origins of this paradox and to contextualize some of its governing assumptions not in order to solve it but to show that having already solved it can’t and doesn’t need to be a prerequisite for scholars of eighteenth-century literature to face it head-on. The first section offers a brief account of how this paradox arose from the political and intellectual matrix of the mid-twentieth century when African Studies was first institutionalized in the West. The subsequent sections highlight the way this history has shaped—both directly and indirectly—the way scholars and teachers of eighteenth-century literature have understood Africa and their obligations to it and suggests some ways we might begin to rethink Africa’s place in the field</p>","PeriodicalId":45243,"journal":{"name":"Literature Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lic3.12749","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lic3.12749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is about why Africa is overlooked in eighteenth-century literary studies. Africa’s neglect is not merely a problem of attention. Neither the parameters of the field nor the tools of the discipline appear particularly suited for engaging Africa as anything other than an invention of the European imagination. In what follows, I seek to bring more clarity to the origins of this paradox and to contextualize some of its governing assumptions not in order to solve it but to show that having already solved it can’t and doesn’t need to be a prerequisite for scholars of eighteenth-century literature to face it head-on. The first section offers a brief account of how this paradox arose from the political and intellectual matrix of the mid-twentieth century when African Studies was first institutionalized in the West. The subsequent sections highlight the way this history has shaped—both directly and indirectly—the way scholars and teachers of eighteenth-century literature have understood Africa and their obligations to it and suggests some ways we might begin to rethink Africa’s place in the field

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲悖论:十八世纪研究中的非洲定位
本文探讨的是非洲为何在十八世纪文学研究中被忽视。非洲被忽视不仅仅是注意力的问题。无论是该领域的参数还是该学科的工具,似乎都不特别适合将非洲作为欧洲想象力的发明之外的东西来研究。在下文中,我试图进一步澄清这一悖论的起源,并对其一些支配性假设进行背景分析,这不是为了解决这一悖论,而是为了表明,已经解决这一悖论不能也不需要成为十八世纪文学学者直面这一悖论的先决条件。第一部分简要介绍了这一悖论是如何在二十世纪中叶非洲研究首次在西方制度化的政治和思想背景下产生的。随后的章节强调了这段历史直接或间接地影响了研究十八世纪文学的学者和教师理解非洲的方式以及他们对非洲的义务,并提出了一些我们可以开始重新思考非洲在这一领域的地位的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literature Compass
Literature Compass LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Chaucerian Theatricality: Then and Now Medievalism, Orientalism, and the Botany of the Holy Land Rehearsing Words and Gestures in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde Islamic Medievalism and Mobility in Mathias Énard's Street of Thieves Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1