A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Diabetes Utilizing Confusion Matrix Analysis

IF 1.2 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Baghdad Science Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.21123/bsj.2023.9010
Maad M. Mijwil, Mohammad Aljanabi
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Diabetes Utilizing Confusion Matrix Analysis","authors":"Maad M. Mijwil, Mohammad Aljanabi","doi":"10.21123/bsj.2023.9010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare experts have been employing machine learning more and more in recent years to enhance patient outcomes and reduce costs. In addition, machine learning has been applied in various areas, including disease diagnosis, patient risk classification, customized treatment suggestions, and drug development. Machine learning algorithms can scrutinize vast quantities of data from electronic health records, medical images, and other sources to identify patterns and make predictions, which can support healthcare professionals and experts in making better-informed decisions, enhancing patient care, and determining a patient's health status. In this regard, the author opted to compare the performance of three algorithms (logistic regression, Adaboost, and naïve bayes) through the correct classification rate for diabetes prediction in order to ensure the effectiveness of accurate diagnosis. The dataset applied in this work is obtained from the Vanderbilt university institutional repository and is publicly available data. The study determined that three algorithms are very effective at prediction. Mainly, logistic regression and Adaboost had a classification rate above 92%, and the naive bayes algorithm achieved a classification rate above 90%.","PeriodicalId":8687,"journal":{"name":"Baghdad Science Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baghdad Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2023.9010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare experts have been employing machine learning more and more in recent years to enhance patient outcomes and reduce costs. In addition, machine learning has been applied in various areas, including disease diagnosis, patient risk classification, customized treatment suggestions, and drug development. Machine learning algorithms can scrutinize vast quantities of data from electronic health records, medical images, and other sources to identify patterns and make predictions, which can support healthcare professionals and experts in making better-informed decisions, enhancing patient care, and determining a patient's health status. In this regard, the author opted to compare the performance of three algorithms (logistic regression, Adaboost, and naïve bayes) through the correct classification rate for diabetes prediction in order to ensure the effectiveness of accurate diagnosis. The dataset applied in this work is obtained from the Vanderbilt university institutional repository and is publicly available data. The study determined that three algorithms are very effective at prediction. Mainly, logistic regression and Adaboost had a classification rate above 92%, and the naive bayes algorithm achieved a classification rate above 90%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用混淆矩阵分析进行糖尿病分类的机器学习算法比较分析
近年来,医疗保健专家越来越多地使用机器学习来提高患者的治疗效果并降低成本。此外,机器学习已经应用于各个领域,包括疾病诊断、患者风险分类、定制治疗建议和药物开发。机器学习算法可以仔细检查来自电子健康记录、医学图像和其他来源的大量数据,以识别模式并进行预测,这可以支持医疗保健专业人员和专家做出更明智的决策、加强患者护理并确定患者的健康状况。为此,笔者选择通过对三种算法(logistic regression, Adaboost, naïve bayes)对糖尿病预测的正确分类率进行性能比较,以保证准确诊断的有效性。本工作中应用的数据集来自范德比尔特大学机构存储库,是公开可用的数据。该研究确定了三种算法在预测方面非常有效。主要是logistic回归和Adaboost的分类率在92%以上,朴素贝叶斯算法的分类率在90%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Baghdad Science Journal
Baghdad Science Journal MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes academic and applied papers dealing with recent topics and scientific concepts. Papers considered for publication in biology, chemistry, computer sciences, physics, and mathematics. Accepted papers will be freely downloaded by professors, researchers, instructors, students, and interested workers. ( Open Access) Published Papers are registered and indexed in the universal libraries.
期刊最新文献
Hopf Bifurcation of Three-Dimensional Quadratic Jerk System Employing Novel Ranking Function for Solving Fully Fuzzy Fractional Linear Programming Problems Estimation of Serum TLR-9,TNF-α, and IL-6 Levels in the Iraqi Patients Diagnosed as Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Histopathologic Changes and Molecular Characterization of Fascioliasis (a Zoonotic Disease) among Slaughtered Livestock in Erbil and Halabja Abattoirs, Kurdistan Region-Iraq Quantifying the Return of Security Investments for Technology Startups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1