Effects of Methanolic Turmeric Extract, Alum on E. coli in Borehole & Sachet Water PH.

Lawrence O. Amadi, None Mark Happines C., None Nrior, R. R.
{"title":"Effects of Methanolic Turmeric Extract, Alum on E. coli in Borehole & Sachet Water PH.","authors":"Lawrence O. Amadi, None Mark Happines C., None Nrior, R. R.","doi":"10.9734/sajrm/2023/v16i4315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research were to determine the antibiogram and effects of methanolic turmeric extract and alum on Escherichia coli in some borehole and sachet water in Rivers State respectively. The various concentrations (100mg/ml,50mg/ml,25mg/ml and 12.5mg/ml) of these combinations, methanolic turmeric extract, Alum, MTE+ Alum were tested respectively for antibacterial activity on some strains of E. coli isolated from borehole and sachet water samples. These were compared with an antibiotic standard, using chloramphenicol as a positive control. Antibacterial activity was assessed using disc diffusion method (DDM) respectively. Of these combinations, methanolic turmeric extracts in synergism with Alum (MTE+Alum) exhibited the lowest mean diameter of inhibitory zone (DIZ) values of 5.0-20.0mm and Alum exhibited the largest mean of inhibitory zone (DIZ) values of 8.0-20.0mm on the test organism using disc diffusion method (DDM) respectively. There was no inhibitory zone with MTE+Aum at 12.5 concentration whereas (DIZ) values for methanolic turmeric extract ranged from 8.0-16.0mm by DDM. The susceptibility of combinations were more pronounced against CP064383 E. coli (20.0mm), CP089272 E. coli (14.0mm), AF099077 E.coli (14.0mm) and LG142154 E.coli (18.0mm) respectively. This results revealed that chloramphenicol inhibited the largest DIZ values. However, the activity of chloramphenicol revealed that purified and tested antibiotic should be used as the drug of choice for treatments. And the synergistic effects of methanolic turmeric extract plus Alum was effective against all strains of E.coli with concentration of 100mg/ml and can be used as second line of treatment against infections caused by E.coli. E. coli isolates with a prevalence of 100% were obtained as the test organisms. Susceptibility pattern of the test isolates showed 100% susceptibility to Gentamycin,75% by chloramphenicol, Ciprofloxacin and Vancomycin. They were resistant to Cefotaxime (75%) and Cotriazole (25%) respectively. Multiple antibiotic resistance index for test isolates revealed 3(75%) of four E.coli strains was >0.2.The results for total heterotrophic bacterial count showed that there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the mean counts sampling locations Ikwerre, Obio/Akpor and Phalga. Faecal Coliform Count revealed that there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the mean counts with sachet water having the highest values of (2.77±0.14, 2.76±0.09 and 2.77±0.17) Log10CFU/ml while borehole water revealed least counts of (1.46±1.29, 0.79±1.18 and 1.86±1.44) Log10CFU/ml. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the potentials of Alum, MTE in synergism with alum as choice of treatment caused by E. coli in water samples from the study area.","PeriodicalId":21776,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/sajrm/2023/v16i4315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research were to determine the antibiogram and effects of methanolic turmeric extract and alum on Escherichia coli in some borehole and sachet water in Rivers State respectively. The various concentrations (100mg/ml,50mg/ml,25mg/ml and 12.5mg/ml) of these combinations, methanolic turmeric extract, Alum, MTE+ Alum were tested respectively for antibacterial activity on some strains of E. coli isolated from borehole and sachet water samples. These were compared with an antibiotic standard, using chloramphenicol as a positive control. Antibacterial activity was assessed using disc diffusion method (DDM) respectively. Of these combinations, methanolic turmeric extracts in synergism with Alum (MTE+Alum) exhibited the lowest mean diameter of inhibitory zone (DIZ) values of 5.0-20.0mm and Alum exhibited the largest mean of inhibitory zone (DIZ) values of 8.0-20.0mm on the test organism using disc diffusion method (DDM) respectively. There was no inhibitory zone with MTE+Aum at 12.5 concentration whereas (DIZ) values for methanolic turmeric extract ranged from 8.0-16.0mm by DDM. The susceptibility of combinations were more pronounced against CP064383 E. coli (20.0mm), CP089272 E. coli (14.0mm), AF099077 E.coli (14.0mm) and LG142154 E.coli (18.0mm) respectively. This results revealed that chloramphenicol inhibited the largest DIZ values. However, the activity of chloramphenicol revealed that purified and tested antibiotic should be used as the drug of choice for treatments. And the synergistic effects of methanolic turmeric extract plus Alum was effective against all strains of E.coli with concentration of 100mg/ml and can be used as second line of treatment against infections caused by E.coli. E. coli isolates with a prevalence of 100% were obtained as the test organisms. Susceptibility pattern of the test isolates showed 100% susceptibility to Gentamycin,75% by chloramphenicol, Ciprofloxacin and Vancomycin. They were resistant to Cefotaxime (75%) and Cotriazole (25%) respectively. Multiple antibiotic resistance index for test isolates revealed 3(75%) of four E.coli strains was >0.2.The results for total heterotrophic bacterial count showed that there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the mean counts sampling locations Ikwerre, Obio/Akpor and Phalga. Faecal Coliform Count revealed that there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the mean counts with sachet water having the highest values of (2.77±0.14, 2.76±0.09 and 2.77±0.17) Log10CFU/ml while borehole water revealed least counts of (1.46±1.29, 0.79±1.18 and 1.86±1.44) Log10CFU/ml. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the potentials of Alum, MTE in synergism with alum as choice of treatment caused by E. coli in water samples from the study area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲醇姜黄提取物、明矾对井内大肠杆菌的影响水的PH值。
本研究的目的是测定甲醇姜黄提取物和明矾对河流州部分钻孔水和香包水中大肠杆菌的抗菌谱及作用。分别以不同浓度(100mg/ml、50mg/ml、25mg/ml和12.5mg/ml)的组合、甲醇姜黄提取物、明矾、MTE+明矾对钻孔和小袋水样中部分大肠杆菌的抑菌活性进行了测试。将这些与抗生素标准进行比较,使用氯霉素作为阳性对照。分别采用圆盘扩散法(DDM)测定其抑菌活性。其中,与明矾(MTE+Alum)协同作用的甲醇姜黄提取物对试验生物的平均抑菌带(DIZ)直径最小,为5.0 ~ 20.0mm,明矾对试验生物的平均抑菌带(DIZ)直径最大,为8.0 ~ 20.0mm。12.5浓度下,MTE+Aum对姜黄醇提物无抑制作用,而DDM对姜黄醇提物的DIZ值为8.0 ~ 16.0mm。组合对CP064383大肠杆菌(20.0mm)、CP089272大肠杆菌(14.0mm)、AF099077大肠杆菌(14.0mm)和LG142154大肠杆菌(18.0mm)的敏感性更为显著。结果表明,氯霉素对DIZ值的抑制作用最大。然而,氯霉素的活性表明,纯化和测试的抗生素应该作为治疗的首选药物。当浓度为100mg/ml时,甲醇姜黄提取物与明矾对大肠杆菌均有协同作用,可作为防治大肠杆菌感染的二线药物。获得了流行率为100%的大肠杆菌分离株作为试验菌。试验菌株对庆大霉素的敏感性为100%,对氯霉素、环丙沙星和万古霉素的敏感性为75%。对头孢噻肟(75%)和复方三唑(25%)耐药。4株大肠杆菌中有3株(75%)多重耐药指数为0.2。异养细菌总数结果显示,Ikwerre、Obio/Akpor和Phalga三个采样点的平均计数差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。粪大肠菌群计数差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),其中包袋水最高,分别为(2.77±0.14,2.76±0.09和2.77±0.17)Log10CFU/ml,井水最低,分别为(1.46±1.29,0.79±1.18和1.86±1.44)Log10CFU/ml。综上所述,本研究证明了明矾、MTE与明矾协同作用的潜力,可作为研究区水样中大肠杆菌引起的处理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Isolation of Amylase Producing Bacteria and Fungi from Kitchen Waste Water of Restaurants and Hostels in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria Evaluation of Antibiogram Profile of Vibrio cholerae Isolates from Sea Foods and Water Samples from Cross River State, Nigeria Impact of Some Hair Cream Compositions on the Flora Density of Human Scalp Enhancing Nutritional Composition of Fermented Parkia biglobosa Seeds with Spices The Sero-prevalence and Risk Factors of Chlamydiosis among Women of Reproductive Age in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1