Can we imagine a new telos for democracy in a non-teleological world?

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethics and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1080/17449642.2023.2261344
Şevket Benhür Oral
{"title":"Can we imagine a new <i>telos</i> for democracy in a non-teleological world?","authors":"Şevket Benhür Oral","doi":"10.1080/17449642.2023.2261344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMany political and economic forces are driven by the desire to eliminate democratic plurality in today’s political juncture. Democratic republicanism itself in its contemporary forms has failed to address many of the daunting moral, political, economic, social, technological, and ecological challenges we face today. It is argued that to fulfill its essence of egalitarian freedom and social justice, democratic republicanism must first decouple from the global neoliberal capitalist regime and secondly embrace some form of postcapitalist and posthumanist orientation guided by a new attractor, a teleological approach anchored in a new telos of superhumanity. Democracy without a telos of superhumanity is a democracy in name only. It is time to lay our teleophobia aside and propose a strong teleological account in the vein of a Buddhist no-self doctrine at the heart of the onto-politico-economy. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. This section has been adapted from Oral, S.B. (2023, forthcoming). Granularity: An ontological inquiry into justice and holistic education. Springer Nature.","PeriodicalId":45613,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Education","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2023.2261344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTMany political and economic forces are driven by the desire to eliminate democratic plurality in today’s political juncture. Democratic republicanism itself in its contemporary forms has failed to address many of the daunting moral, political, economic, social, technological, and ecological challenges we face today. It is argued that to fulfill its essence of egalitarian freedom and social justice, democratic republicanism must first decouple from the global neoliberal capitalist regime and secondly embrace some form of postcapitalist and posthumanist orientation guided by a new attractor, a teleological approach anchored in a new telos of superhumanity. Democracy without a telos of superhumanity is a democracy in name only. It is time to lay our teleophobia aside and propose a strong teleological account in the vein of a Buddhist no-self doctrine at the heart of the onto-politico-economy. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. This section has been adapted from Oral, S.B. (2023, forthcoming). Granularity: An ontological inquiry into justice and holistic education. Springer Nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能想象在一个非目的论的世界里民主的新目标吗?
摘要在当今的政治关头,许多政治和经济力量都被消灭民主多元性的愿望所驱动。当代形式的民主共和主义本身未能解决我们今天面临的许多令人生畏的道德、政治、经济、社会、技术和生态挑战。作者认为,为了实现其平等自由和社会正义的本质,民主共和主义首先必须与全球新自由主义资本主义政权脱钩,其次必须接受某种形式的后资本主义和后人文主义取向,这种取向由一种新的吸引力所引导,一种锚定在超人类的新目的上的目的论方法。没有超人的目的的民主只是名义上的民主。现在是时候把我们的目的论恐惧症放在一边了,并提出一个强有力的目的论解释,以佛教的无我教义为核心,作为个人政治经济的核心。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本节改编自Oral, S.B.(2023,即将出版)。粒度:正义与全人教育的本体论探究。施普林格自然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics and Education
Ethics and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Situated knowledge between purposes and facts and its relation to pedagogical tact Transforming relationships. Pedagogical tact as a utopian figure of mediation Tactlessness as condition for teaching tact: educational reflections based on Adorno Theorising education from within pedagogical tact: a matter of singularity, attunement, and rules-as-not-rules Parents as psychological coaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1