“Let’s Not Tank the Reputation of This Organization.” How Newsroom Social Media Policies Exacerbate Journalism’s Labor Crisis

IF 2.8 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1080/1461670x.2023.2263797
Logan Molyneux, Jacob L. Nelson
{"title":"“Let’s Not Tank the Reputation of This Organization.” How Newsroom Social Media Policies Exacerbate Journalism’s Labor Crisis","authors":"Logan Molyneux, Jacob L. Nelson","doi":"10.1080/1461670x.2023.2263797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study explores the tension between journalists’ personal social media accounts and newsroom social media policies to understand how newsroom managers exacerbate journalism’s labor crisis by de-professionalizing the field through restrictive policies. To analyze this tension, we conduct a critical discourse analysis of (1) managerial discourses collected from newsroom social media policies and scholarly literature and (2) journalistic discourses collected from in-depth interviews with 37 U.S. journalists. We find that newsroom social media policies require journalists to make four sacrifices in service of their organization’s reputation: individuality, opinion, voice, and privacy. This leaves journalists feeling frustrated by their lack of agency when it comes to engaging with the public and pursuing social media success. We conclude that this conflict contributes to journalism’s human resources crisis by limiting journalistic professionalism and autonomy, both of which are crucial for job satisfaction and journalism’s democratic mission.KEYWORDS: Social mediajournalismprofessionalismautonomyobjectivitylabor AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank their co-authors on related work (Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Diana Bossio, Avery E. Holton, and Kaitlin C. Miller) and the reviewers and editors of this special for their contributions to this manuscript.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":17541,"journal":{"name":"Journalism Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2023.2263797","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study explores the tension between journalists’ personal social media accounts and newsroom social media policies to understand how newsroom managers exacerbate journalism’s labor crisis by de-professionalizing the field through restrictive policies. To analyze this tension, we conduct a critical discourse analysis of (1) managerial discourses collected from newsroom social media policies and scholarly literature and (2) journalistic discourses collected from in-depth interviews with 37 U.S. journalists. We find that newsroom social media policies require journalists to make four sacrifices in service of their organization’s reputation: individuality, opinion, voice, and privacy. This leaves journalists feeling frustrated by their lack of agency when it comes to engaging with the public and pursuing social media success. We conclude that this conflict contributes to journalism’s human resources crisis by limiting journalistic professionalism and autonomy, both of which are crucial for job satisfaction and journalism’s democratic mission.KEYWORDS: Social mediajournalismprofessionalismautonomyobjectivitylabor AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank their co-authors on related work (Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Diana Bossio, Avery E. Holton, and Kaitlin C. Miller) and the reviewers and editors of this special for their contributions to this manuscript.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们不要破坏本组织的声誉。”新闻编辑室社交媒体政策如何加剧新闻业的劳工危机
摘要本研究探讨记者个人社交媒体账户与新闻编辑室社交媒体政策之间的紧张关系,以了解新闻编辑室管理者如何通过限制性政策使新闻领域去专业化,从而加剧新闻行业的劳工危机。为了分析这种紧张关系,我们对(1)从新闻编辑室社交媒体政策和学术文献中收集的管理话语和(2)从对37名美国记者的深度采访中收集的新闻话语进行了批判性话语分析。我们发现,新闻编辑室的社交媒体政策要求记者为维护组织的声誉做出四项牺牲:个性、观点、声音和隐私。这让记者们感到沮丧,因为他们在与公众接触和追求社交媒体成功方面缺乏能动性。我们的结论是,这种冲突通过限制新闻的专业性和自主性而导致新闻的人力资源危机,而这两者对于工作满意度和新闻的民主使命至关重要。作者希望感谢他们在相关工作中的合著者(valsamrie bsamlair - gagnon, Diana Bossio, Avery E. Holton和Kaitlin C. Miller)以及本特刊的审稿人和编辑对本文的贡献。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism Studies
Journalism Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
Journalistic Careers and Gender in Brazil: Impasses and Inequalities between Men and Women in the Profession Playful Citizens: How Children Develop and Integrate News-Related Practices in Their Daily Lives “Am I a Journalist?” Lifestyle Journalists’ Discursive Construction of Their Profession Inside, Outside, and Alongside the Journalistic Field Mediated Public Diplomacy and RT on Instagram: Role of International Institutions, Audience Engagement, and Online Account Bans Journalists at the Frontline: Recognising and Managing Emotions in the Face of Conflict and Terrorism in Burkina Faso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1