Gestational diabetes screening and management: the issues of GDM risk factors and phone number documentations

Fortunatus D. Gbeinbo, Phillip T. Bwititi, Ezekiel U. Nwose
{"title":"Gestational diabetes screening and management: the issues of GDM risk factors and phone number documentations","authors":"Fortunatus D. Gbeinbo, Phillip T. Bwititi, Ezekiel U. Nwose","doi":"10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20232909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) if unmanaged can complicate pregnancy outcomes. Selective screening of GDM is a common policy hence, the need for complete medical records of patients. The extent and pattern that documentation of patients’ records can impact GDM screening-by-telehealth requires elucidation. The aim was to describe the effectiveness of phone contacts on medical records and GDM risk factors among a hospital-based antenatal clinic setting Methods: This was an observational study in which previously reported antenatal records of patients screened for GDM were reviewed for effectiveness of phone contacts to do telehealth, and this was with simultaneous GDM risk assessment. Data were analysed by descriptive frequency counting. Results: On effectiveness of phone details on medical records, 41/98 cases were reached, of which 31.7% have three or more GDM risk factors to fulfil selection criteria for laboratory screening of GDM. Prevalence of risk factors in initial routine data collection (24.9%), previous history assessment (21.3%) and at antenatal monitoring phase (37.8%), Among the 57/98 phone contacts that were unreached, 59.6% are switched off. Conclusions: The observations highlight the need of concerted focus on policy and education, for both staff and patients, to improve documentation of correct and valid telephone details in medical records.","PeriodicalId":14297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Reports","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20232909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) if unmanaged can complicate pregnancy outcomes. Selective screening of GDM is a common policy hence, the need for complete medical records of patients. The extent and pattern that documentation of patients’ records can impact GDM screening-by-telehealth requires elucidation. The aim was to describe the effectiveness of phone contacts on medical records and GDM risk factors among a hospital-based antenatal clinic setting Methods: This was an observational study in which previously reported antenatal records of patients screened for GDM were reviewed for effectiveness of phone contacts to do telehealth, and this was with simultaneous GDM risk assessment. Data were analysed by descriptive frequency counting. Results: On effectiveness of phone details on medical records, 41/98 cases were reached, of which 31.7% have three or more GDM risk factors to fulfil selection criteria for laboratory screening of GDM. Prevalence of risk factors in initial routine data collection (24.9%), previous history assessment (21.3%) and at antenatal monitoring phase (37.8%), Among the 57/98 phone contacts that were unreached, 59.6% are switched off. Conclusions: The observations highlight the need of concerted focus on policy and education, for both staff and patients, to improve documentation of correct and valid telephone details in medical records.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期糖尿病筛查和管理:GDM危险因素和电话号码文件的问题
背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)如果不加以控制会使妊娠结局复杂化。GDM的选择性筛查是一项普遍政策,因此需要完整的患者医疗记录。患者记录的程度和模式可以影响GDM远程医疗筛查需要阐明。目的是描述医院产前诊所设置中电话联系对医疗记录和GDM风险因素的有效性。方法:这是一项观察性研究,回顾了先前报道的GDM筛查患者的产前记录,以了解电话联系进行远程医疗的有效性,同时进行了GDM风险评估。采用描述性频率计数法分析数据。结果:病历电话信息的有效性达到41/98,其中有3个及以上GDM危险因素符合GDM实验室筛查选择标准的占31.7%。在最初的常规资料收集(24.9%)、既往史评估(21.3%)和产前监测阶段(37.8%)中危险因素的流行程度,在未联系的57/98电话联系人中,59.6%被关闭。结论:观察结果突出表明,需要协调一致地注重政策和对工作人员和患者的教育,以改进病历中正确有效的电话详细信息的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transforming weight measurement: a cutting-edge IoT-enabled smart weight machine for centralized price control of products A closer observation of the dedicated responsibilities of nurses at public hospitals in Bangladesh Navigating a paradigm shift; food and drug administration approved Tarlatamab-dlle redefining the landscape of small cell lung cancer therapy Orthodontic treatment modalities of intrusion: a review A clinical research site pharmacy for the division of AIDS sponsored clinical trials in a low middle income country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1