Paul Hilaire, Yaron Castor, Edwin Barnes, Sophia E. Economou, Frédéric Grosshans
{"title":"Linear Optical Logical Bell State Measurements with Optimal Loss-Tolerance Threshold","authors":"Paul Hilaire, Yaron Castor, Edwin Barnes, Sophia E. Economou, Frédéric Grosshans","doi":"10.1103/prxquantum.4.040322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantum threshold theorems impose hard limits on the hardware capabilities to process quantum information. We derive tight and fundamental upper bounds to loss-tolerance thresholds in different linear-optical quantum information processing settings through an adversarial framework, taking into account the intrinsically probabilistic nature of linear optical Bell measurements. For logical Bell state measurements—ubiquitous operations in photonic quantum information—we demonstrate analytically that linear optics can achieve the fundamental loss threshold imposed by the no-cloning theorem even though, following the work of Lee et al. [Phys. Rev. A 100, 052303 (2019)] the constraint was widely assumed to be stricter. We spotlight the assumptions of the latter publication and find their bound holds for a logical Bell measurement built from adaptive physical linear-optical Bell measurements. We also give an explicit even stricter bound for nonadaptive Bell measurements.7 MoreReceived 21 February 2023Revised 22 May 2023Accepted 22 September 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040322Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.Published by the American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasIntegrated opticsQuantum communicationQuantum error correctionQuantum foundationsQuantum information theoryQuantum Information, Science & TechnologyAtomic, Molecular & Optical","PeriodicalId":74587,"journal":{"name":"PRX quantum : a Physical Review journal","volume":"3 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRX quantum : a Physical Review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.4.040322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Quantum threshold theorems impose hard limits on the hardware capabilities to process quantum information. We derive tight and fundamental upper bounds to loss-tolerance thresholds in different linear-optical quantum information processing settings through an adversarial framework, taking into account the intrinsically probabilistic nature of linear optical Bell measurements. For logical Bell state measurements—ubiquitous operations in photonic quantum information—we demonstrate analytically that linear optics can achieve the fundamental loss threshold imposed by the no-cloning theorem even though, following the work of Lee et al. [Phys. Rev. A 100, 052303 (2019)] the constraint was widely assumed to be stricter. We spotlight the assumptions of the latter publication and find their bound holds for a logical Bell measurement built from adaptive physical linear-optical Bell measurements. We also give an explicit even stricter bound for nonadaptive Bell measurements.7 MoreReceived 21 February 2023Revised 22 May 2023Accepted 22 September 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040322Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.Published by the American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasIntegrated opticsQuantum communicationQuantum error correctionQuantum foundationsQuantum information theoryQuantum Information, Science & TechnologyAtomic, Molecular & Optical
量子阈值定理对处理量子信息的硬件能力施加了硬性限制。考虑到线性光学贝尔测量的内在概率性质,我们通过对抗性框架推导出不同线性光学量子信息处理设置中损失容忍阈值的严格和基本上界。对于逻辑贝尔态测量——光子量子信息中无处不在的操作——我们分析地证明了线性光学可以达到不可克隆定理所施加的基本损失阈值,尽管在Lee等人的工作之后。Rev. A 100,052303(2019)]的约束被普遍认为更严格。我们重点介绍了后一出版物的假设,并找到了自适应物理线性光学贝尔测量建立的逻辑贝尔测量的界持有。对于非自适应贝尔测量,我们也给出了一个明确的更严格的界根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议,美国物理学会于2023年9月22日接受doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040322Published。这项工作的进一步分发必须保持作者的归属和已发表文章的标题,期刊引用和DOI。发表于美国物理学会物理学科标题(PhySH)研究领域集成光学量子通信量子纠错量子基础量子信息理论量子信息科学与技术原子分子光学