Toward Aspirational Care Labor: Dementia Care Meets Documentary Filmmaking

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Signs Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/725831
Danielle Drees
{"title":"Toward Aspirational Care Labor: Dementia Care Meets Documentary Filmmaking","authors":"Danielle Drees","doi":"10.1086/725831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On film, care for people with dementia looks like bleak work. Tragedy and horror are the film genres most often deployed to represent dementia care, reflecting the austere material realities of that care in the United States today. Despite decades of feminist organizing around the importance of care labor, the current shortage of carers for aging and disabled people in the United States suggests that few view it as a first-choice job. Two recent documentaries, cocreated by a person with dementia and their carer, dispute the horror story of dementia care: Michelle Memran and Irene Fornes’s The Rest I Make Up and Kirsten Johnson and Dick Johnson’s Dick Johnson Is Dead reveal the creative possibilities of dementia care as well as the care work fundamental to filmmaking. I compare the labor of filmmaking with the labor of caring in these documentaries to argue that they transform dementia care into aspirational labor—labor that, like filmmaking itself, can be recognized and experienced as valuable, creative work. I assert that these films reconfigure a landscape of bleak and austere care labor, experiment with ways of living in which care work is well distributed and well liked, and envision dementia care as care we all might give and receive.","PeriodicalId":51382,"journal":{"name":"Signs","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On film, care for people with dementia looks like bleak work. Tragedy and horror are the film genres most often deployed to represent dementia care, reflecting the austere material realities of that care in the United States today. Despite decades of feminist organizing around the importance of care labor, the current shortage of carers for aging and disabled people in the United States suggests that few view it as a first-choice job. Two recent documentaries, cocreated by a person with dementia and their carer, dispute the horror story of dementia care: Michelle Memran and Irene Fornes’s The Rest I Make Up and Kirsten Johnson and Dick Johnson’s Dick Johnson Is Dead reveal the creative possibilities of dementia care as well as the care work fundamental to filmmaking. I compare the labor of filmmaking with the labor of caring in these documentaries to argue that they transform dementia care into aspirational labor—labor that, like filmmaking itself, can be recognized and experienced as valuable, creative work. I assert that these films reconfigure a landscape of bleak and austere care labor, experiment with ways of living in which care work is well distributed and well liked, and envision dementia care as care we all might give and receive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向理想护理劳动:痴呆症护理与纪录片制作
在电影中,照顾痴呆症患者看起来像是一项凄凉的工作。悲剧和恐怖是最常被用来表现痴呆症护理的电影类型,反映了当今美国痴呆症护理的严峻物质现实。尽管几十年来女权主义者一直围绕护理劳动力的重要性组织起来,但目前美国老年人和残疾人护理人员的短缺表明,很少有人将其视为首选工作。最近有两部纪录片,由一位痴呆症患者和他的护理人员共同制作,对痴呆症护理的恐怖故事提出了质疑:米歇尔·梅曼和艾琳·福恩斯的《其余的我弥补》和克尔斯滕·约翰逊和迪克·约翰逊的《迪克·约翰逊死了》揭示了痴呆症护理的创造性可能性,以及护理工作对电影制作的基础。在这些纪录片中,我比较了电影制作的劳动和护理的劳动,认为它们把痴呆症护理变成了一种有抱负的劳动,这种劳动就像电影制作本身一样,可以被认可和体验为有价值的、创造性的工作。我断言,这些电影重新塑造了一个荒凉而严峻的护理工作的景观,实验了一种生活方式,在这种生活方式中,护理工作得到了很好的分配和欢迎,并将痴呆症护理设想为我们所有人都可以给予和接受的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Signs
Signs WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading international journal in women"s studies, Signs has since 1975 been at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and/or sexuality either as central focuses or as constitutive analytics; symposia engaging comparative, interdisciplinary perspectives from around the globe to analyze concepts and topics of import to feminist scholarship; retrospectives that track the growth and development of feminist scholarship, note transformations in key concepts and methodologies, and construct genealogies of feminist inquiry; and new directions essays, which provide an overview of the main themes, controversies.
期刊最新文献
Connective Labor as Emotional Vocabulary: Inequality, Mutuality, and the Politics of Feelings in Care-Work Acuerpar: The Decolonial Feminist Call for Embodied Solidarity About the Contributors Challenging the Antipolitics of Regimes of Care: Young African Men in Italy Resist Precarious Futures Victory or Defeat? The Dilemma of Palliative Schooling in an Era of Racial Equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1