Establishing cut-offs for the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for people living with chronic pain

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3138/jmvfh-2023-0076
Freddy Bishay, Gregory K. Tippin, Adria Fransson, Eleni G. Hapidou
{"title":"Establishing cut-offs for the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for people living with chronic pain","authors":"Freddy Bishay, Gregory K. Tippin, Adria Fransson, Eleni G. Hapidou","doi":"10.3138/jmvfh-2023-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LAY SUMMARY Cut-offs were established for the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) by examining it with other clinical measures in 189 patients, including 69 Veterans, who attended a four-week interdisciplinary chronic pain management program. By dividing the PSEQ scores into low, medium, and high ranges, the authors examined the PSEQ’s association with fear of movement/re-injury (kinesiophobia), pain interference, and pain catastrophizing at admission and discharge from the program. Kinesiophobia was found to be most related to the proposed cut-offs. Findings support the use of PSEQ cut-offs when considering self-efficacy and kinesiophobia. Future research should evaluate these cut-offs with larger samples and functional/occupational measures. The findings show promise for individuals with chronic pain and continue to increase the understanding of the clinicians who work with these individuals.","PeriodicalId":36411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2023-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LAY SUMMARY Cut-offs were established for the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) by examining it with other clinical measures in 189 patients, including 69 Veterans, who attended a four-week interdisciplinary chronic pain management program. By dividing the PSEQ scores into low, medium, and high ranges, the authors examined the PSEQ’s association with fear of movement/re-injury (kinesiophobia), pain interference, and pain catastrophizing at admission and discharge from the program. Kinesiophobia was found to be most related to the proposed cut-offs. Findings support the use of PSEQ cut-offs when considering self-efficacy and kinesiophobia. Future research should evaluate these cut-offs with larger samples and functional/occupational measures. The findings show promise for individuals with chronic pain and continue to increase the understanding of the clinicians who work with these individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立慢性疼痛患者疼痛自我效能问卷的截止点
189名患者(包括69名退伍军人)参加了为期四周的跨学科慢性疼痛管理项目,通过将疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ)与其他临床测量相结合,建立了疼痛自我效能问卷的截止值。通过将PSEQ分数划分为低、中、高三个等级,作者研究了PSEQ与运动/再损伤恐惧(运动恐惧症)、疼痛干扰以及入院和出院时疼痛灾难的关系。运动恐惧症被发现与拟议的切断最相关。研究结果支持在考虑自我效能和运动恐惧症时使用PSEQ截止值。未来的研究应该用更大的样本和功能/职业测量来评估这些截止值。这些发现为患有慢性疼痛的个体带来了希望,并继续增加与这些个体一起工作的临床医生的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Studying military and Veteran health using a life-course approach: Lessons learned from a Canadian record linkage study Canada’s varying approach to compensating disabled Reserve Force members and Veterans since 1866 Peer support and psychedelics A force to imagine: A feminist rethinking of universality of service A history and future of psychedelics: The case of the Canadian military
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1