Canada’s varying approach to compensating disabled Reserve Force members and Veterans since 1866

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.3138/jmvfh-2022-0079
John Milne
{"title":"Canada’s varying approach to compensating disabled Reserve Force members and Veterans since 1866","authors":"John Milne","doi":"10.3138/jmvfh-2022-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LAY SUMMARY This article examines the different levels of liability Canada has assumed for disabled serving military members and Veterans from 1866 to 2020. Throughout Canada’s history, the first consideration for financial compensation has been the enrolment component of the casualty, that is, Regular, Reserve, or Special Force. Since 1883, disabled serving Regular Force members have received full pay and benefits while recovering from service-related injuries. Whether through the Militia Act, the Pension Act, long-term disability insurance, or the current Veterans Well-being Act (VWA), disabled Regular Force Veterans received financial compensation based on lost earnings. Before 1914, Canada’s military was a predominantly part-time militia, and if a member was disabled or killed due to a service-related injury or illness, lost civilian earnings and family circumstances were considered in financial compensation. From the First World War until the 1970s, serving Reservists were eligible for military pay and benefits while recovering from service-related injuries. Currently, subject to an investigation clearing them of fault or malfeasance, they may apply for an allowance equivalent to military pay with no benefits. Between 1919 and 1999, the government accepted less and less liability for disabled Reserve Force Veterans until recent changes to Veterans benefits legislation incrementally improved this.","PeriodicalId":36411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2022-0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LAY SUMMARY This article examines the different levels of liability Canada has assumed for disabled serving military members and Veterans from 1866 to 2020. Throughout Canada’s history, the first consideration for financial compensation has been the enrolment component of the casualty, that is, Regular, Reserve, or Special Force. Since 1883, disabled serving Regular Force members have received full pay and benefits while recovering from service-related injuries. Whether through the Militia Act, the Pension Act, long-term disability insurance, or the current Veterans Well-being Act (VWA), disabled Regular Force Veterans received financial compensation based on lost earnings. Before 1914, Canada’s military was a predominantly part-time militia, and if a member was disabled or killed due to a service-related injury or illness, lost civilian earnings and family circumstances were considered in financial compensation. From the First World War until the 1970s, serving Reservists were eligible for military pay and benefits while recovering from service-related injuries. Currently, subject to an investigation clearing them of fault or malfeasance, they may apply for an allowance equivalent to military pay with no benefits. Between 1919 and 1999, the government accepted less and less liability for disabled Reserve Force Veterans until recent changes to Veterans benefits legislation incrementally improved this.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大自 1866 年以来对伤残后备役军人和退伍军人的不同补偿方式
摘要 本文探讨了加拿大从 1866 年至 2020 年对伤残现役军人和退伍军人承担的不同程度的赔偿责任。纵观加拿大历史,经济补偿的首要考虑因素是伤亡人员的参军成分,即正规军、后备役或特种部队。自 1883 年以来,伤残的现役正规部队成员在从与服役有关的伤害中恢复时可获得全额工资和福利。无论是通过《民兵法》、《养老金法》、长期伤残保险,还是目前的《退伍军人福利法》(VWA),正规部队伤残退伍军人都可获得基于收入损失的经济补偿。1914 年以前,加拿大军队主要是兼职民兵,如果一名成员因公受伤或患病致残或死亡,经济补偿将考虑其失去的平民收入和家庭情况。从第一次世界大战到 20 世纪 70 年代,现役后备役军人在因公受伤恢复期间有资格领取军饷和福利。目前,如果调查证明他们没有过错或渎职,他们可以申请相当于军饷的津贴,但没有福利。从 1919 年到 1999 年,政府对伤残后备役退伍军人承担的责任越来越少,直到最近对退伍军人福利立法的修改才逐步改善了这一状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Studying military and Veteran health using a life-course approach: Lessons learned from a Canadian record linkage study Canada’s varying approach to compensating disabled Reserve Force members and Veterans since 1866 Peer support and psychedelics A force to imagine: A feminist rethinking of universality of service A history and future of psychedelics: The case of the Canadian military
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1