Community-government, and private partnership (CGPP): revisiting the concept of community-based forest management

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY International Forestry Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1505/146554823837586276
K. Komalawati, S. Hidayat, R.H. Praptana, M.D. Pertiwi, A.S. Romdon, Y. Hidayat, D. Yuniati, S. Syahyuti, R.P. Ramadhan, S. Saptana, C. Indrawanto
{"title":"Community-government, and private partnership (CGPP): revisiting the concept of community-based forest management","authors":"K. Komalawati, S. Hidayat, R.H. Praptana, M.D. Pertiwi, A.S. Romdon, Y. Hidayat, D. Yuniati, S. Syahyuti, R.P. Ramadhan, S. Saptana, C. Indrawanto","doi":"10.1505/146554823837586276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) model has been seen as a potential solution to solve various problems related to forest degradation and the creation of inclusive forest governance. However, in practice, CBFM does not always implement smoothly, with some studies highlighting the weaknesses of CBFM in term of accountability, transparency, efficiency, effectiveness, empowerment, monitoring, law enforcement, and dependency on external actors. Accordingly, this paper revisits the concept of CBFM from the perspective of New Institutional Economics and the proper governance concept. The data collection process was conducted through literature studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology. It may be argued that the implementation of CBFM has weaknesses in terms of, amongst other things, business and organizational activities, inclusivity, community empowerment, community income, and sustainability. In reference to the various flaws encountered in the implementation of CBFM, and to put in place proper governance in forest business activities, this paper proposes a new model – the so-called Community-Government and Private Partnership model (CGPP). This developed model has positioned the cooperative as \"core institutions\" whose role is to orchestrate five main governance functions, namely: organizational, business activities, human resource development, and corporate and environmental sustainability. This CGPP model is expected to contribute to the existing literature of institutional analysis and forest management with a different approach, as well providing concrete recommendations for the implementation of the CGPP model in CBFM.","PeriodicalId":13868,"journal":{"name":"International Forestry Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forestry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1505/146554823837586276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) model has been seen as a potential solution to solve various problems related to forest degradation and the creation of inclusive forest governance. However, in practice, CBFM does not always implement smoothly, with some studies highlighting the weaknesses of CBFM in term of accountability, transparency, efficiency, effectiveness, empowerment, monitoring, law enforcement, and dependency on external actors. Accordingly, this paper revisits the concept of CBFM from the perspective of New Institutional Economics and the proper governance concept. The data collection process was conducted through literature studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology. It may be argued that the implementation of CBFM has weaknesses in terms of, amongst other things, business and organizational activities, inclusivity, community empowerment, community income, and sustainability. In reference to the various flaws encountered in the implementation of CBFM, and to put in place proper governance in forest business activities, this paper proposes a new model – the so-called Community-Government and Private Partnership model (CGPP). This developed model has positioned the cooperative as "core institutions" whose role is to orchestrate five main governance functions, namely: organizational, business activities, human resource development, and corporate and environmental sustainability. This CGPP model is expected to contribute to the existing literature of institutional analysis and forest management with a different approach, as well providing concrete recommendations for the implementation of the CGPP model in CBFM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区政府和私人伙伴关系:重新审视社区森林管理的概念
以社区为基础的森林管理(CBFM)模式被视为解决与森林退化和建立包容性森林治理有关的各种问题的潜在解决办法。然而,在实践中,CBFM并不总是顺利实施,一些研究强调了CBFM在问责制、透明度、效率、有效性、赋权、监测、执法和对外部行为者的依赖方面的弱点。因此,本文从新制度经济学和适当治理的角度重新审视了CBFM的概念。数据收集过程是通过文献研究进行的,使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)方法的首选报告项目。有人可能会认为,在商业和组织活动、包容性、社区赋权、社区收入和可持续性等方面,CBFM的实施存在弱点。针对社区森林管理在实施过程中遇到的各种缺陷,为了在森林商业活动中实施适当的治理,本文提出了一种新的模式——所谓的社区政府和私人伙伴关系模式(CGPP)。这种已开发的模型将合作社定位为“核心机构”,其作用是协调五个主要的治理功能,即:组织、业务活动、人力资源开发以及公司和环境的可持续性。该模型有望以不同的方法对现有的制度分析和森林管理文献做出贡献,并为在CBFM中实施CGPP模型提供具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Forestry Review
International Forestry Review 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Forestry Review is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that publishes original research and review papers on forest policy and science, with an emphasis on issues of transnational significance. It is published four times per year, in March, June, September and December. Special Issues are a regular feature and attract a wide audience. Click here for subscription details.
期刊最新文献
Development cooperation, non-timber forest products and community empowerment: power and interests in a public-private partnership in the Brazilian Amazon Passion for nature: global student motivations for forestrelated education and career aspirations The experience of Forest Landscape Restoration in Madhya Pradesh, India Mangrove biomass and carbon estimates for REDD+ from national forest inventory in two regions of Myanmar Lessons from insect and disease impacts on radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations in New Zealand over the last hundred years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1