Shared Futures or Financialized Futures: Polygenic Screening, Reproductive Justice, and the Radical Charge of Collective Care

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Signs Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/725832
Jennifer Denbow, Tamara Lea Spira
{"title":"Shared Futures or Financialized Futures: Polygenic Screening, Reproductive Justice, and the Radical Charge of Collective Care","authors":"Jennifer Denbow, Tamara Lea Spira","doi":"10.1086/725832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polygenic screening is a new form of embryo testing that assesses the probability that an embryo will later develop a wide range of health conditions. This technology purports to help prospective parents choose which embryos to implant during in-vitro fertilization to ensure the “healthiest” baby. In this essay, we interrogate polygenic screening as part of the broader economy of finance capital–backed fertility technologies that are redefining notions of care to stress individual risk mitigation and neo-eugenic genetic selection as a way to promote the ableist mirage of “healthy” futures for generations to come. Contesting these false promises, our essay reveals the political-economic interests that lurk behind this problematic notion of care, juxtaposing it with an alternative vision of collective care by engaging radical Black, Indigenous, and socialist feminist calls for reproductive justice, mutual aid, and the revaluation and reorganization of reproductive labor. We argue that the embrace of polygenic screening obfuscates the political roots of our crisis of reproductive labor and care—an obfuscation that also silences the ecological precarity upon which the settler state is predicated. We thus bring neoliberal, eugenic, and ultimately settler colonial ideologies of privatized care into stark relief with an alternative that will more likely open up futures for all of our children and kin. Foregrounding radical collective approaches to care repoliticizes discussions of maternal/parental care; it also points to the necessary political movement building required if we are to cherish and protect the lives of current and future generations, the planet, and all its inhabitants.","PeriodicalId":51382,"journal":{"name":"Signs","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polygenic screening is a new form of embryo testing that assesses the probability that an embryo will later develop a wide range of health conditions. This technology purports to help prospective parents choose which embryos to implant during in-vitro fertilization to ensure the “healthiest” baby. In this essay, we interrogate polygenic screening as part of the broader economy of finance capital–backed fertility technologies that are redefining notions of care to stress individual risk mitigation and neo-eugenic genetic selection as a way to promote the ableist mirage of “healthy” futures for generations to come. Contesting these false promises, our essay reveals the political-economic interests that lurk behind this problematic notion of care, juxtaposing it with an alternative vision of collective care by engaging radical Black, Indigenous, and socialist feminist calls for reproductive justice, mutual aid, and the revaluation and reorganization of reproductive labor. We argue that the embrace of polygenic screening obfuscates the political roots of our crisis of reproductive labor and care—an obfuscation that also silences the ecological precarity upon which the settler state is predicated. We thus bring neoliberal, eugenic, and ultimately settler colonial ideologies of privatized care into stark relief with an alternative that will more likely open up futures for all of our children and kin. Foregrounding radical collective approaches to care repoliticizes discussions of maternal/parental care; it also points to the necessary political movement building required if we are to cherish and protect the lives of current and future generations, the planet, and all its inhabitants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享的未来或金融化的未来:多基因筛选、生殖正义和集体护理的激进冲锋
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Signs
Signs WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading international journal in women"s studies, Signs has since 1975 been at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and/or sexuality either as central focuses or as constitutive analytics; symposia engaging comparative, interdisciplinary perspectives from around the globe to analyze concepts and topics of import to feminist scholarship; retrospectives that track the growth and development of feminist scholarship, note transformations in key concepts and methodologies, and construct genealogies of feminist inquiry; and new directions essays, which provide an overview of the main themes, controversies.
期刊最新文献
Connective Labor as Emotional Vocabulary: Inequality, Mutuality, and the Politics of Feelings in Care-Work Acuerpar: The Decolonial Feminist Call for Embodied Solidarity About the Contributors Challenging the Antipolitics of Regimes of Care: Young African Men in Italy Resist Precarious Futures Victory or Defeat? The Dilemma of Palliative Schooling in an Era of Racial Equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1