How Does Diagnostic Accuracy Evolve with Increased Breast MRI Experience?

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Tomography Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.3390/tomography9060162
Tong Wu, Afsaneh Alikhassi, Belinda Curpen
{"title":"How Does Diagnostic Accuracy Evolve with Increased Breast MRI Experience?","authors":"Tong Wu, Afsaneh Alikhassi, Belinda Curpen","doi":"10.3390/tomography9060162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Our institution is part of a provincial program providing annual breast MRI screenings to high-risk women. We assessed how MRI experience, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) affect the biopsy-proven predictive value (PPV3) and accuracy for detecting suspicious MRI findings. Methods: From all high-risk screening breast MRIs conducted between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2020, we reviewed all BI-RADS 4/5 observations with pathological tissue diagnoses. Overall and annual PPV3s were computed. Radiologists with fewer than ten observations were excluded from performance analyses. PPV3s were computed for each radiologist. We assessed how MRI experience, BPE, and FGT impacted diagnostic accuracy using logistic regression analyses, defining positive cases as malignancies alone (definition A) or malignant or high-risk lesions (definition B). Findings: There were 536 BI-RADS 4/5 observations with tissue diagnoses, including 77 malignant and 51 high-risk lesions. A total of 516 observations were included in the radiologist performance analyses. The average radiologist’s PPV3 was 16 ± 6% (definition A) and 25 ± 8% (definition B). MRI experience in years correlated significantly with positive cases (definition B, OR = 1.05, p = 0.03), independent of BPE or FGT. Diagnostic accuracy improved exponentially with increased MRI experience (definition B, OR of 1.27 and 1.61 for 5 and 10 years, respectively, p = 0.03 for both). Lower levels of BPE significantly correlated with increased odds of findings being malignant, independent of FGT and MRI experience. Summary: More extensive MRI reading experience improves radiologists’ diagnostic accuracy for high-risk or malignant lesions, even in MRI studies with increased BPE.","PeriodicalId":51330,"journal":{"name":"Tomography","volume":"8 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9060162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our institution is part of a provincial program providing annual breast MRI screenings to high-risk women. We assessed how MRI experience, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) affect the biopsy-proven predictive value (PPV3) and accuracy for detecting suspicious MRI findings. Methods: From all high-risk screening breast MRIs conducted between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2020, we reviewed all BI-RADS 4/5 observations with pathological tissue diagnoses. Overall and annual PPV3s were computed. Radiologists with fewer than ten observations were excluded from performance analyses. PPV3s were computed for each radiologist. We assessed how MRI experience, BPE, and FGT impacted diagnostic accuracy using logistic regression analyses, defining positive cases as malignancies alone (definition A) or malignant or high-risk lesions (definition B). Findings: There were 536 BI-RADS 4/5 observations with tissue diagnoses, including 77 malignant and 51 high-risk lesions. A total of 516 observations were included in the radiologist performance analyses. The average radiologist’s PPV3 was 16 ± 6% (definition A) and 25 ± 8% (definition B). MRI experience in years correlated significantly with positive cases (definition B, OR = 1.05, p = 0.03), independent of BPE or FGT. Diagnostic accuracy improved exponentially with increased MRI experience (definition B, OR of 1.27 and 1.61 for 5 and 10 years, respectively, p = 0.03 for both). Lower levels of BPE significantly correlated with increased odds of findings being malignant, independent of FGT and MRI experience. Summary: More extensive MRI reading experience improves radiologists’ diagnostic accuracy for high-risk or malignant lesions, even in MRI studies with increased BPE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断准确性如何随着乳腺MRI经验的增加而发展?
简介:我们的机构是一个省级项目的一部分,每年为高危妇女提供乳房MRI筛查。我们评估了MRI经验、背景实质增强(BPE)和纤维腺组织(FGT)的数量如何影响活检证实的预测值(PPV3)和检测可疑MRI发现的准确性。方法:从2011年7月1日至2020年6月30日期间进行的所有高危筛查乳腺mri中,我们回顾了所有BI-RADS 4/5观察结果和病理组织诊断。计算总PPV3s和年度PPV3s。观察少于10次的放射科医生被排除在绩效分析之外。计算每位放射科医生的PPV3s。我们使用逻辑回归分析评估了MRI经验、BPE和FGT如何影响诊断准确性,将阳性病例定义为单独的恶性肿瘤(定义A)或恶性或高风险病变(定义B)。结果:有536例BI-RADS 4/5观察结果与组织诊断,包括77例恶性病变和51例高风险病变。总共516项观察被纳入放射科医生的表现分析。放射科医师的PPV3平均为16±6%(定义A)和25±8%(定义B)。MRI年数与阳性病例(定义B, OR = 1.05, p = 0.03)有显著相关性,与BPE或FGT无关。随着MRI经验的增加,诊断准确性呈指数级提高(定义B, 5年和10年的OR分别为1.27和1.61,两者p = 0.03)。较低的BPE水平与恶性发现的几率增加显著相关,独立于FGT和MRI经验。总结:更广泛的MRI阅读经验提高了放射科医生对高风险或恶性病变的诊断准确性,即使在BPE增加的MRI研究中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tomography
Tomography Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
222
期刊介绍: TomographyTM publishes basic (technical and pre-clinical) and clinical scientific articles which involve the advancement of imaging technologies. Tomography encompasses studies that use single or multiple imaging modalities including for example CT, US, PET, SPECT, MR and hyperpolarization technologies, as well as optical modalities (i.e. bioluminescence, photoacoustic, endomicroscopy, fiber optic imaging and optical computed tomography) in basic sciences, engineering, preclinical and clinical medicine. Tomography also welcomes studies involving exploration and refinement of contrast mechanisms and image-derived metrics within and across modalities toward the development of novel imaging probes for image-based feedback and intervention. The use of imaging in biology and medicine provides unparalleled opportunities to noninvasively interrogate tissues to obtain real-time dynamic and quantitative information required for diagnosis and response to interventions and to follow evolving pathological conditions. As multi-modal studies and the complexities of imaging technologies themselves are ever increasing to provide advanced information to scientists and clinicians. Tomography provides a unique publication venue allowing investigators the opportunity to more precisely communicate integrated findings related to the diverse and heterogeneous features associated with underlying anatomical, physiological, functional, metabolic and molecular genetic activities of normal and diseased tissue. Thus Tomography publishes peer-reviewed articles which involve the broad use of imaging of any tissue and disease type including both preclinical and clinical investigations. In addition, hardware/software along with chemical and molecular probe advances are welcome as they are deemed to significantly contribute towards the long-term goal of improving the overall impact of imaging on scientific and clinical discovery.
期刊最新文献
Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction with Elevated Filling Pressures Is Associated with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Atrial Fibrillation. A Hybrid CNN-Transformer Model for Predicting N Staging and Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Based on CT-Scan. The Correlation between the Elastic Modulus of the Achilles Tendon Enthesis and Bone Microstructure in the Calcaneal Crescent. Feature Reviews for Tomography 2023. Optimal DaTQUANT Thresholds for Diagnostic Accuracy of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's Disease (PD).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1