Robotic Platform da Vinci Xi Is Feasible and Beneficial in Both Colon and Rectal Surgery in Short-Term Outcome and Recovery

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Insights Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.3390/gastroent14040038
Yi-Lin Huang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Feng-Fan Chiang
{"title":"Robotic Platform da Vinci Xi Is Feasible and Beneficial in Both Colon and Rectal Surgery in Short-Term Outcome and Recovery","authors":"Yi-Lin Huang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Feng-Fan Chiang","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The literature discussed colorectal surgery using a robotic platform, which is mainly the previous da Vinci Si system. The role of the da Vinci Xi surgical system remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the benefits and feasibility of using the robot-assisted method in colorectal surgery. Methods: We retrospectively collected 418 patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery between March 2020 and December 2021, in a single center. Patients were divided into robotic and laparoscopic groups. Primary outcomes were conversion rates to open surgery, complications, and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were post-operation functional outcomes. Results: A total of 218 patients received colectomy, while 200 patients received rectum resection. No differences were found in the conversion rate in both groups. A lower complication rate (colectomy: 7.5% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.01, rectum resection: 14.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.038) and shorter LOS (5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001) was found in the robotic group. The robotic approach was associated with good functional outcomes in tolerated solid food and the termination of urinary drainage. Conclusions: The new da Vinci Xi system is safe and feasible both for colonic and rectal surgery, with reduced complications. Shorter LOS and reliable short-term outcomes may reflect both better functional recovery and surgical quality when compared to laparoscopic surgery.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The literature discussed colorectal surgery using a robotic platform, which is mainly the previous da Vinci Si system. The role of the da Vinci Xi surgical system remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the benefits and feasibility of using the robot-assisted method in colorectal surgery. Methods: We retrospectively collected 418 patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery between March 2020 and December 2021, in a single center. Patients were divided into robotic and laparoscopic groups. Primary outcomes were conversion rates to open surgery, complications, and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were post-operation functional outcomes. Results: A total of 218 patients received colectomy, while 200 patients received rectum resection. No differences were found in the conversion rate in both groups. A lower complication rate (colectomy: 7.5% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.01, rectum resection: 14.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.038) and shorter LOS (5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001) was found in the robotic group. The robotic approach was associated with good functional outcomes in tolerated solid food and the termination of urinary drainage. Conclusions: The new da Vinci Xi system is safe and feasible both for colonic and rectal surgery, with reduced complications. Shorter LOS and reliable short-term outcomes may reflect both better functional recovery and surgical quality when compared to laparoscopic surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:文献讨论了使用机器人平台进行结直肠手术,主要是以前的达芬奇系统。本研究旨在评估在结直肠手术中使用机器人辅助方法的益处和可行性。方法:我们回顾性收集了2020年3月至2021年12月在单一中心接受微创结直肠手术的418例患者。患者分为机器人组和腹腔镜组。主要结局是开腹手术转换率、并发症和住院时间(LOS)。次要结局为术后功能结局。结果:218例患者行结肠切除术,200例患者行直肠切除术。两组的转化率没有差异。并发症发生率较低(结肠切除术:7.5%对23.2%,p = 0.01,直肠切除术:14.1%对28.7%,p = 0.038), LOS较短(5天对8天,p <0.001)。机器人方法与耐受固体食物的良好功能结果和尿排的终止有关。与腹腔镜手术相比,更短的LOS和可靠的短期结果可能反映出更好的功能恢复和手术质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Insights
Gastroenterology Insights GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Interleukin-17, High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Pepsinogen in Helicobacter pylori Infected Gastritis Elevated Incidence and Risk of Emergent Cirrhosis Complications in Alcoholic Cirrhosis Compared with Other Etiologies Insights into the Characteristics and Functions of Mast Cells in the Gut Terlipressin for the Prevention and Treatment of Renal Decline in Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Drug Profile. Microbiome and Genetic Factors in the Pathogenesis of Liver Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1