Pub Date : 2024-01-10DOI: 10.3390/gastroent15010003
Jeanne Winarta, B. J. Waleleng, N. Wenas, Fujiyanto, Oscar Miguna, Marco Rahardja
Gastritis is an inflammatory process in the gastric mucosa and submucosa caused by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). The infection modulates immune components, such as interleukin (IL) 17, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and pepsinogen. This study aimed to determine the relationship between IL-17, hsCRP and pepsinogen in H. pylori infected gastritis. This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou General Hospital Manado from May-July 2022. Measurement of blood sample levels of IL-17, hsCRP, pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II and pepsinogen I/II ratio. Spearman’s statistical test was used to determine correlations between these variables. This study involved 48 patients aged 21–64, with a majority of females (67%). IL-7 had a positive correlation with pepsinogen I (r = 0.292; p = 0.044) and pepsinogen II (r = 0.288; p = 0.047) in H. pylori infected gastritis. Meanwhile, IL-17 with pepsinogen I/II ratio, hsCRP with pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, pepsinogen I/II ratio and IL-17 with hsCRP did not show a significant correlation (p > 0.05). There was a correlation between IL 17 to pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II in gastritis infected with H. pylori, suggesting the importance of these early markers of inflammation in determining the severity of gastric mucosal inflammation in pylori-infected patients.
{"title":"Correlation between Interleukin-17, High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Pepsinogen in Helicobacter pylori Infected Gastritis","authors":"Jeanne Winarta, B. J. Waleleng, N. Wenas, Fujiyanto, Oscar Miguna, Marco Rahardja","doi":"10.3390/gastroent15010003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent15010003","url":null,"abstract":"Gastritis is an inflammatory process in the gastric mucosa and submucosa caused by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). The infection modulates immune components, such as interleukin (IL) 17, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and pepsinogen. This study aimed to determine the relationship between IL-17, hsCRP and pepsinogen in H. pylori infected gastritis. This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou General Hospital Manado from May-July 2022. Measurement of blood sample levels of IL-17, hsCRP, pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II and pepsinogen I/II ratio. Spearman’s statistical test was used to determine correlations between these variables. This study involved 48 patients aged 21–64, with a majority of females (67%). IL-7 had a positive correlation with pepsinogen I (r = 0.292; p = 0.044) and pepsinogen II (r = 0.288; p = 0.047) in H. pylori infected gastritis. Meanwhile, IL-17 with pepsinogen I/II ratio, hsCRP with pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, pepsinogen I/II ratio and IL-17 with hsCRP did not show a significant correlation (p > 0.05). There was a correlation between IL 17 to pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II in gastritis infected with H. pylori, suggesting the importance of these early markers of inflammation in determining the severity of gastric mucosal inflammation in pylori-infected patients.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139440831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040045
Xiaoliang Wang, Dominic Collins, Alex Dague, Zachary Wright, Jiayan Wang, Wesam M Frandah
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of urgent hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis. However, limited studies have examined the prevalence and risk of these complications based on etiology. This study aims to compare the occurrence and risk of cirrhosis complications on inpatient mortality between alcoholic cirrhosis (ALC) and other etiology-induced cirrhosis (NALC). This retrospective analysis included 7,159,694 patients. ALC was diagnosed based on ICD-10, while NALC included primary and secondary biliary cirrhosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and unspecified cirrhosis of the liver. GIB included bleeding from esophageal and gastric varices. Bivariate analyses using appropriate statistical tests were performed to compare the two groups. ALC patients had a significantly higher incidence of GIB compared with NALC patients (10.8% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.01), with an associated 60% higher risk of GIB than NALC patients (p < 0.01). ALC was associated with a higher prevalence of ascites (45.6% vs. 27.9%, p < 0.01) and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (45.5% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.01) compared with NALC patients. The risk of ascites and HE was 2.2 times and 2.3 times higher, respectively, in ALC patients compared with NALC patients (p < 0.01). Furthermore, ALC patients had higher hospital mortality rates compared with NALC patients, with a 47% higher risk of hospital mortality after adjustment (p < 0.01). ALC patients also had prolonged hospital stays, higher charges, more emergency room (ER) visits, and more frequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) requirements compared with those of NALC patients (p < 0.01). ALC patients have a significantly higher risk of developing GIB, ascites, and HE compared with NALC patients, leading to increased mortality and greater medical burden on hospitals.
{"title":"Elevated Incidence and Risk of Emergent Cirrhosis Complications in Alcoholic Cirrhosis Compared with Other Etiologies","authors":"Xiaoliang Wang, Dominic Collins, Alex Dague, Zachary Wright, Jiayan Wang, Wesam M Frandah","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040045","url":null,"abstract":"Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of urgent hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis. However, limited studies have examined the prevalence and risk of these complications based on etiology. This study aims to compare the occurrence and risk of cirrhosis complications on inpatient mortality between alcoholic cirrhosis (ALC) and other etiology-induced cirrhosis (NALC). This retrospective analysis included 7,159,694 patients. ALC was diagnosed based on ICD-10, while NALC included primary and secondary biliary cirrhosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and unspecified cirrhosis of the liver. GIB included bleeding from esophageal and gastric varices. Bivariate analyses using appropriate statistical tests were performed to compare the two groups. ALC patients had a significantly higher incidence of GIB compared with NALC patients (10.8% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.01), with an associated 60% higher risk of GIB than NALC patients (p < 0.01). ALC was associated with a higher prevalence of ascites (45.6% vs. 27.9%, p < 0.01) and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (45.5% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.01) compared with NALC patients. The risk of ascites and HE was 2.2 times and 2.3 times higher, respectively, in ALC patients compared with NALC patients (p < 0.01). Furthermore, ALC patients had higher hospital mortality rates compared with NALC patients, with a 47% higher risk of hospital mortality after adjustment (p < 0.01). ALC patients also had prolonged hospital stays, higher charges, more emergency room (ER) visits, and more frequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) requirements compared with those of NALC patients (p < 0.01). ALC patients have a significantly higher risk of developing GIB, ascites, and HE compared with NALC patients, leading to increased mortality and greater medical burden on hospitals.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"30 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138997401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mast cells have vital functions in allergic responses and parasite ejection, while the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Meanwhile, MCs are essential for the maintenance of GI barrier function, and their interactions with neurons, immune cells, and epithelial cells have been related to various gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. An increasing number of investigations are being disclosed, with a lack of inner connections among them. This review aims to highlight their properties and categorization and further delve into their participation in GI diseases via interplay with neurons and immune cells. We also discuss their roles in diseases like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Based on the evidence, we advocated for their potential application in clinical practices and advocated future research prospects.
{"title":"Insights into the Characteristics and Functions of Mast Cells in the Gut","authors":"Yuexin Guo, Bo-ya Wang, Han Gao, Chengwei He, Shuzi Xin, Rongxuan Hua, Xiaohui Liu, Sitian Zhang, Jingdong Xu","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040043","url":null,"abstract":"Mast cells have vital functions in allergic responses and parasite ejection, while the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Meanwhile, MCs are essential for the maintenance of GI barrier function, and their interactions with neurons, immune cells, and epithelial cells have been related to various gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. An increasing number of investigations are being disclosed, with a lack of inner connections among them. This review aims to highlight their properties and categorization and further delve into their participation in GI diseases via interplay with neurons and immune cells. We also discuss their roles in diseases like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Based on the evidence, we advocated for their potential application in clinical practices and advocated future research prospects.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"79 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138600271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-09-28DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040031
Ahlam Ayyad, Rami A Al-Horani
Hepatorenal syndrome stands as one of several potential triggers of acute kidney injury in individuals grappling with either acute or persistent liver ailments. The nature of the decline in kidney function has led to the identification of two variants of hepatorenal syndrome. In cases where terlipressin therapy is accessible, the initial approach involves administering terlipressin alongside albumin. Terlipressin, a synthetic analog of vasopressin, boasts double the preference for vasopressin V1 receptors compared to V2 receptors. The FDA granted approval to terlipressin in September 2022, demonstrating its intrinsic activity, although a significant portion of its function arises from its transformation into lysine vasopressin. This article provides a comprehensive examination of terlipressin's various pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic facets, as well as its clinical utility, aiming to keep the scientific community well informed about its safe and efficient utilization.
{"title":"Terlipressin for the Prevention and Treatment of Renal Decline in Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Drug Profile.","authors":"Ahlam Ayyad, Rami A Al-Horani","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040031","DOIUrl":"10.3390/gastroent14040031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatorenal syndrome stands as one of several potential triggers of acute kidney injury in individuals grappling with either acute or persistent liver ailments. The nature of the decline in kidney function has led to the identification of two variants of hepatorenal syndrome. In cases where terlipressin therapy is accessible, the initial approach involves administering terlipressin alongside albumin. Terlipressin, a synthetic analog of vasopressin, boasts double the preference for vasopressin V1 receptors compared to V2 receptors. The FDA granted approval to terlipressin in September 2022, demonstrating its intrinsic activity, although a significant portion of its function arises from its transformation into lysine vasopressin. This article provides a comprehensive examination of terlipressin's various pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic facets, as well as its clinical utility, aiming to keep the scientific community well informed about its safe and efficient utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"14 4","pages":"420-430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49692955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-14DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040041
Dimitrina Miteva, Monika Peshevska-Sekulovska, Violeta Snegarova, Milena Peruhova, Georgi H. Vasilev, Georgi V. Vasilev, Metodija Sekulovski, Snezhina Lazova, Milena Gulinac, Latchezar Tomov, Antoaneta Mihova, Tsvetelina Velikova
Our genetic background has not changed over the past century, but chronic diseases are on the rise globally. In addition to the genetic component, among the critical factors for many diseases are inhabitants of our intestines (gut microbiota) as a crucial environmental factor. Dysbiosis has been described in liver diseases with different etiologies like non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). On the other hand, new technologies have increased our understanding of liver disease genetics and treatment options. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identify unknown genetic risk factors, positional cloning of unknown genes associated with different diseases, gene tests for single nucleotide variations (SNVs), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of selected genes or the complete genome. NGS also allowed studying the microbiome and its role in various liver diseases has begun. These genes have proven their effect on microbiome composition in host genome–microbiome association studies. We focus on altering the intestinal microbiota, and supplementing some bacterial metabolites could be considered a potential therapeutic strategy. The literature data promote probiotics/synbiotics role in reducing proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and the interleukins (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8), therefore improving transaminase levels, hepatic steatosis, and NAFLD activity score. However, even though microbial therapy appears to be risk-free, evaluating side effects related to probiotics or synbiotics is imperative. In addition, safety profiles for long-term usage should be researched. Thus, this review focuses on the human microbiome and liver diseases, recent GWASs on liver disease, the gut-liver axis, and the associations with the microbiome and microbiome during/after liver disease therapy.
{"title":"Microbiome and Genetic Factors in the Pathogenesis of Liver Diseases","authors":"Dimitrina Miteva, Monika Peshevska-Sekulovska, Violeta Snegarova, Milena Peruhova, Georgi H. Vasilev, Georgi V. Vasilev, Metodija Sekulovski, Snezhina Lazova, Milena Gulinac, Latchezar Tomov, Antoaneta Mihova, Tsvetelina Velikova","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040041","url":null,"abstract":"Our genetic background has not changed over the past century, but chronic diseases are on the rise globally. In addition to the genetic component, among the critical factors for many diseases are inhabitants of our intestines (gut microbiota) as a crucial environmental factor. Dysbiosis has been described in liver diseases with different etiologies like non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). On the other hand, new technologies have increased our understanding of liver disease genetics and treatment options. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identify unknown genetic risk factors, positional cloning of unknown genes associated with different diseases, gene tests for single nucleotide variations (SNVs), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of selected genes or the complete genome. NGS also allowed studying the microbiome and its role in various liver diseases has begun. These genes have proven their effect on microbiome composition in host genome–microbiome association studies. We focus on altering the intestinal microbiota, and supplementing some bacterial metabolites could be considered a potential therapeutic strategy. The literature data promote probiotics/synbiotics role in reducing proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and the interleukins (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8), therefore improving transaminase levels, hepatic steatosis, and NAFLD activity score. However, even though microbial therapy appears to be risk-free, evaluating side effects related to probiotics or synbiotics is imperative. In addition, safety profiles for long-term usage should be researched. Thus, this review focuses on the human microbiome and liver diseases, recent GWASs on liver disease, the gut-liver axis, and the associations with the microbiome and microbiome during/after liver disease therapy.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"65 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134901309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-09DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040040
Aline Coelho Rocha Candolo, Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado, Patricia Momoyo Zitelli, Daniel Ferraz de Campos Mazo, Claudia Pinto Marques Oliveira, Marlone Cunha-Silva, Raquel Dias Greca, Roberta Chaves Araújo, Amanda Sacha Paulino Tolentino Alustau, Claudia Alves Couto, Mateus Jorge Nardelli, Roque Gabriel Rezende de Lima, Alberto Queiroz Farias, Flair José Carrilho, Mário Guimarães Pessôa
Background: Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL-D) is a rare genetic disease associated with the deregulation of lipid metabolism, leading to atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, and hepatic steatosis, with potential progression to cirrhosis. Our study aims to assess the role of LAL-D in the setting of cryptogenic liver disease. Methods: A large multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted, which included 135 patients with cryptogenic liver disease from four liver centers in Brazil. All patients were submitted to the investigation of LAL enzyme activity on dried blood spots. Results: Three patients (two female) presented levels of LAL below the reference limit, compatible with LAL-D (2.2%). They had a mean age of 43.9 ± 10.1 years and a mean body-mass index (BMI) of 23.1 ± 1.7 kg/m2. The mean serum levels of glucose, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were 89.7 ± 3.2, 21.7 ± 3.2, and 206.7 ± 25.5 mg/dL, respectively. All patients had duodenal polyposis with xanthomatous macrophages. LAL-D investigation should be considered for individuals with chronic liver disease of an unknown etiology, especially with a normal BMI, high triglycerides, and low-HDL-cholesterol levels. The identification of LAL-D patients is extremely important since enzyme replacement therapy with Sebelipase Alfa significantly increases their survival.
{"title":"Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency in the Etiological Investigation of Cryptogenic Liver Disease in Adults: A Multicenter Brazilian Study","authors":"Aline Coelho Rocha Candolo, Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado, Patricia Momoyo Zitelli, Daniel Ferraz de Campos Mazo, Claudia Pinto Marques Oliveira, Marlone Cunha-Silva, Raquel Dias Greca, Roberta Chaves Araújo, Amanda Sacha Paulino Tolentino Alustau, Claudia Alves Couto, Mateus Jorge Nardelli, Roque Gabriel Rezende de Lima, Alberto Queiroz Farias, Flair José Carrilho, Mário Guimarães Pessôa","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040040","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL-D) is a rare genetic disease associated with the deregulation of lipid metabolism, leading to atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, and hepatic steatosis, with potential progression to cirrhosis. Our study aims to assess the role of LAL-D in the setting of cryptogenic liver disease. Methods: A large multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted, which included 135 patients with cryptogenic liver disease from four liver centers in Brazil. All patients were submitted to the investigation of LAL enzyme activity on dried blood spots. Results: Three patients (two female) presented levels of LAL below the reference limit, compatible with LAL-D (2.2%). They had a mean age of 43.9 ± 10.1 years and a mean body-mass index (BMI) of 23.1 ± 1.7 kg/m2. The mean serum levels of glucose, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were 89.7 ± 3.2, 21.7 ± 3.2, and 206.7 ± 25.5 mg/dL, respectively. All patients had duodenal polyposis with xanthomatous macrophages. LAL-D investigation should be considered for individuals with chronic liver disease of an unknown etiology, especially with a normal BMI, high triglycerides, and low-HDL-cholesterol levels. The identification of LAL-D patients is extremely important since enzyme replacement therapy with Sebelipase Alfa significantly increases their survival.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":" 33","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135241752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-08DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040039
Michele Cevolani, Marco Ferronato, Chiara Elide Lizzio, Eleonora Elia, Desy Marini, Elena Mazzotta, Claudio Ricci, Riccardo Casadei, Marina Migliori
Background and aim: Over the last few years, SARS-CoV-2 has been reported as a possible cause of acute pancreatitis (AP), but whether it is a relevant clinical–epidemiological entity is still a matter of debate. We aim to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of AP during the first year of the COVID pandemic (2020) and compare them with the pre-COVID period (2008–2019) to identify any differences and clarify a potential causative role of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We used a monocentric retrospective study of 132 AP patients during 2020 and 1987 AP patients during 2008–2019. Diagnosis and severity were classified according to the revised Atlanta criteria. Propensity score matching was performed according to clinical–epidemiological features, and outcome analysis was performed on two subgroups of 109 patients. Results: The total number of AP cases in 2020 is one of the lowest in the last 13 years (132 cases, median 161, IQR 146-183). No major epidemiological differences were noted. During 2020, we observed a significant modification of the distribution of etiologies (p < 0.001), mainly based on a decrease in biliary forms (59.6% vs. 43.2%) and an increase in alcoholic forms (6.9% vs. 12.9%). Idiopathic forms remain unchanged (20.5% vs. 21.9%). The proportion of AP of idiopathic etiology and SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.008%. There were no differences in terms of severity distribution (p = 0.127), length of stay (p = 0.916), need for ICU (p = 0.139), or mortality (p = 0.462). Even among statistically matched groups, there were no differences between the length of stay (9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.890), need for ICU admission (1.8% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.683), or in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 1.8%, p = 0.342). Conclusions: The lower AP diagnoses indicate delayed and likely missed diagnoses, probably because of both hesitancy and organizational problems during the pandemic. The unchanged proportion of idiopathic forms supports the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 is not an AP trigger.
{"title":"COVID-19 and Acute Pancreatitis: Not Increased Risk but Reduced Care","authors":"Michele Cevolani, Marco Ferronato, Chiara Elide Lizzio, Eleonora Elia, Desy Marini, Elena Mazzotta, Claudio Ricci, Riccardo Casadei, Marina Migliori","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040039","url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim: Over the last few years, SARS-CoV-2 has been reported as a possible cause of acute pancreatitis (AP), but whether it is a relevant clinical–epidemiological entity is still a matter of debate. We aim to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of AP during the first year of the COVID pandemic (2020) and compare them with the pre-COVID period (2008–2019) to identify any differences and clarify a potential causative role of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We used a monocentric retrospective study of 132 AP patients during 2020 and 1987 AP patients during 2008–2019. Diagnosis and severity were classified according to the revised Atlanta criteria. Propensity score matching was performed according to clinical–epidemiological features, and outcome analysis was performed on two subgroups of 109 patients. Results: The total number of AP cases in 2020 is one of the lowest in the last 13 years (132 cases, median 161, IQR 146-183). No major epidemiological differences were noted. During 2020, we observed a significant modification of the distribution of etiologies (p < 0.001), mainly based on a decrease in biliary forms (59.6% vs. 43.2%) and an increase in alcoholic forms (6.9% vs. 12.9%). Idiopathic forms remain unchanged (20.5% vs. 21.9%). The proportion of AP of idiopathic etiology and SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.008%. There were no differences in terms of severity distribution (p = 0.127), length of stay (p = 0.916), need for ICU (p = 0.139), or mortality (p = 0.462). Even among statistically matched groups, there were no differences between the length of stay (9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.890), need for ICU admission (1.8% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.683), or in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 1.8%, p = 0.342). Conclusions: The lower AP diagnoses indicate delayed and likely missed diagnoses, probably because of both hesitancy and organizational problems during the pandemic. The unchanged proportion of idiopathic forms supports the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 is not an AP trigger.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"48 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135430514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-06DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040038
Yi-Lin Huang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Feng-Fan Chiang
Background: The literature discussed colorectal surgery using a robotic platform, which is mainly the previous da Vinci Si system. The role of the da Vinci Xi surgical system remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the benefits and feasibility of using the robot-assisted method in colorectal surgery. Methods: We retrospectively collected 418 patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery between March 2020 and December 2021, in a single center. Patients were divided into robotic and laparoscopic groups. Primary outcomes were conversion rates to open surgery, complications, and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were post-operation functional outcomes. Results: A total of 218 patients received colectomy, while 200 patients received rectum resection. No differences were found in the conversion rate in both groups. A lower complication rate (colectomy: 7.5% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.01, rectum resection: 14.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.038) and shorter LOS (5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001) was found in the robotic group. The robotic approach was associated with good functional outcomes in tolerated solid food and the termination of urinary drainage. Conclusions: The new da Vinci Xi system is safe and feasible both for colonic and rectal surgery, with reduced complications. Shorter LOS and reliable short-term outcomes may reflect both better functional recovery and surgical quality when compared to laparoscopic surgery.
{"title":"Robotic Platform da Vinci Xi Is Feasible and Beneficial in Both Colon and Rectal Surgery in Short-Term Outcome and Recovery","authors":"Yi-Lin Huang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Feng-Fan Chiang","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040038","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The literature discussed colorectal surgery using a robotic platform, which is mainly the previous da Vinci Si system. The role of the da Vinci Xi surgical system remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the benefits and feasibility of using the robot-assisted method in colorectal surgery. Methods: We retrospectively collected 418 patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery between March 2020 and December 2021, in a single center. Patients were divided into robotic and laparoscopic groups. Primary outcomes were conversion rates to open surgery, complications, and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were post-operation functional outcomes. Results: A total of 218 patients received colectomy, while 200 patients received rectum resection. No differences were found in the conversion rate in both groups. A lower complication rate (colectomy: 7.5% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.01, rectum resection: 14.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.038) and shorter LOS (5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001) was found in the robotic group. The robotic approach was associated with good functional outcomes in tolerated solid food and the termination of urinary drainage. Conclusions: The new da Vinci Xi system is safe and feasible both for colonic and rectal surgery, with reduced complications. Shorter LOS and reliable short-term outcomes may reflect both better functional recovery and surgical quality when compared to laparoscopic surgery.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135590154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040037
Srujitha Marupuru, Daniel Arku, David R. Axon, Lorenzo Villa-Zapata, Mohsen Yaghoubi, Marion K. Slack, Terri Warholak
Globally, gastric cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality, with a 5-year survival rate of 32% for locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer (A/MCG). This systematic literature review summarized the clinical, safety, and humanistic outcomes associated with systemic regimens administered as a first-line therapy for A/MGC. The search included articles published in English in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting library, from inception to April 2022. Phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted among western populations diagnosed with stage III and IV A/MGC were included. Two investigators independently reviewed the studies, conducted data extraction, and assessed risk of bias in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials totaling 8705 patients were included. Median overall survival ranged from 5.0 to 13.1 months, median progression-free survival ranged from 2.0 to 7.7 months, and objective response ranged from 13.0 to 64.1%. Two studies reported high quality-of-life outcomes. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were reported in most studies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of first-line systemic therapy outcomes in western populations with A/MGC. With the evolving treatment landscape of A/MGC, an improvement in clinical outcomes can be seen in recently published RCTs with immunotherapies. The potential of new targeted treatments and immunotherapies may present more favorable forthcoming options for treating A/MGC.
在全球范围内，胃癌是癌症死亡的主要原因，局部晚期和转移性胃癌(a /MCG)的5年生存率为32%。本系统的文献综述总结了作为a /MGC一线治疗的系统性方案的临床、安全性和人文预后。检索包括从成立到2022年4月在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和美国临床肿瘤学会会议图书馆发表的英文文章。在诊断为III期和IV期A/MGC的西方人群中进行的II期和III期随机对照试验(rct)被纳入。两名研究者独立审查了这些研究，进行了数据提取，并根据PRISMA指南评估了偏倚风险。纳入24项随机对照试验，共8705例患者。中位总生存期为5.0 ~ 13.1个月，中位无进展生存期为2.0 ~ 7.7个月，客观缓解期为13.0 ~ 64.1%。两项研究报告了高质量的生活结果。大多数研究报告了3级和4级不良事件。本综述提供了对西方a /MGC患者一线全身治疗结果的全面概述。随着A/MGC治疗前景的不断发展，在最近发表的免疫疗法随机对照试验中可以看到临床结果的改善。新的靶向治疗和免疫疗法的潜力可能为治疗A/MGC提供更有利的选择。
{"title":"First-Line Systemic Therapy Outcomes in Western Population with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Gastric Cancer—A Systematic Review","authors":"Srujitha Marupuru, Daniel Arku, David R. Axon, Lorenzo Villa-Zapata, Mohsen Yaghoubi, Marion K. Slack, Terri Warholak","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040037","url":null,"abstract":"Globally, gastric cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality, with a 5-year survival rate of 32% for locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer (A/MCG). This systematic literature review summarized the clinical, safety, and humanistic outcomes associated with systemic regimens administered as a first-line therapy for A/MGC. The search included articles published in English in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting library, from inception to April 2022. Phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted among western populations diagnosed with stage III and IV A/MGC were included. Two investigators independently reviewed the studies, conducted data extraction, and assessed risk of bias in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials totaling 8705 patients were included. Median overall survival ranged from 5.0 to 13.1 months, median progression-free survival ranged from 2.0 to 7.7 months, and objective response ranged from 13.0 to 64.1%. Two studies reported high quality-of-life outcomes. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were reported in most studies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of first-line systemic therapy outcomes in western populations with A/MGC. With the evolving treatment landscape of A/MGC, an improvement in clinical outcomes can be seen in recently published RCTs with immunotherapies. The potential of new targeted treatments and immunotherapies may present more favorable forthcoming options for treating A/MGC.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"58 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135221540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-27DOI: 10.3390/gastroent14040036
Annie Tremblay, Xiaoyu Xu, James Colee, Thomas A. Tompkins, Sylvie Binda
Numerous clinical studies published in the Chinese language support the use of Medilac-S (Bacillus subtilis R0179 and Enterococcus faecium R0026; non-commercial name IBacilluS+) as an adjuvant in various indications, including ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, acute gastritis, and Helicobacter pylori therapy. This systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted to summarize clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of this probiotic formulation as an adjuvant to conventional IBS medications. The systematic literature searches in six international and Chinese databases identified 37 eligible studies, of which 33 reported the efficacy of Medilac-S adjunctive therapy using a standardized categorical scale. These 33 studies were included in the meta-analysis using a random-effect model with a stratification by IBS subtype. Overall, Medilac-S significantly improved the efficacy of conventional IBS treatment (RR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.17–1.25; and p < 0.0001) with an average probability of treatment effectiveness being 21% higher with the probiotic adjuvant, regardless of the subtype. Adverse events, reported in 78% of the trials, were described as mild-to-moderate and self-resolving, with a similar incidence in the probiotic adjuvant (6.2%; n = 1347) and control (5.9%; n = 1331) groups. The results of this meta-analysis strengthen the conclusions that Medilac-S is a safe and effective adjuvant to a variety of conventional treatments in IBS patients.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Medilac-S as an Adjuvant to Conventional Irritable Bowel Syndrome Treatments: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis","authors":"Annie Tremblay, Xiaoyu Xu, James Colee, Thomas A. Tompkins, Sylvie Binda","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040036","url":null,"abstract":"Numerous clinical studies published in the Chinese language support the use of Medilac-S (Bacillus subtilis R0179 and Enterococcus faecium R0026; non-commercial name IBacilluS+) as an adjuvant in various indications, including ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, acute gastritis, and Helicobacter pylori therapy. This systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted to summarize clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of this probiotic formulation as an adjuvant to conventional IBS medications. The systematic literature searches in six international and Chinese databases identified 37 eligible studies, of which 33 reported the efficacy of Medilac-S adjunctive therapy using a standardized categorical scale. These 33 studies were included in the meta-analysis using a random-effect model with a stratification by IBS subtype. Overall, Medilac-S significantly improved the efficacy of conventional IBS treatment (RR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.17–1.25; and p < 0.0001) with an average probability of treatment effectiveness being 21% higher with the probiotic adjuvant, regardless of the subtype. Adverse events, reported in 78% of the trials, were described as mild-to-moderate and self-resolving, with a similar incidence in the probiotic adjuvant (6.2%; n = 1347) and control (5.9%; n = 1331) groups. The results of this meta-analysis strengthen the conclusions that Medilac-S is a safe and effective adjuvant to a variety of conventional treatments in IBS patients.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"17 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136234499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：