Paradoxical career sensemaking among emerging adults

Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1080/03634523.2023.2254860
Shelly L. Robinson, Patrice M. Buzzanell
{"title":"Paradoxical career sensemaking among emerging adults","authors":"Shelly L. Robinson, Patrice M. Buzzanell","doi":"10.1080/03634523.2023.2254860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEmerging adults, who are late millennials and Gen Z members, question the worth of higher education, especially in preparation for volatile labor markets, careers, and other precarities. We analyzed emerging adults’ sensemaking about this education–career–precarity mix through the constitutive lens of paradox using the applied tensional approach. We identified two main paradoxes centering around feelings of education and career security and vulnerability: (a) students’ beliefs about educational attainment as leading directly to career success (golden ticket) that coexist with understandings that there are no guarantees; and (b) feelings of isolation in the self-managed career (“it’s all up to me”) that share space with desires for social networks but as educational products established by others and consistent with student-as-consumer and neoliberal ideologies. In demystifying these paradoxes, we advocate more-than approaches that position tensions as opportunities, incorporate both career development and critical communication pedagogy, and transcend through quality control interventions.KEYWORDS: careerssensemakingparadoxescommunication educationapplied tensional approach Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2023.2254860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTEmerging adults, who are late millennials and Gen Z members, question the worth of higher education, especially in preparation for volatile labor markets, careers, and other precarities. We analyzed emerging adults’ sensemaking about this education–career–precarity mix through the constitutive lens of paradox using the applied tensional approach. We identified two main paradoxes centering around feelings of education and career security and vulnerability: (a) students’ beliefs about educational attainment as leading directly to career success (golden ticket) that coexist with understandings that there are no guarantees; and (b) feelings of isolation in the self-managed career (“it’s all up to me”) that share space with desires for social networks but as educational products established by others and consistent with student-as-consumer and neoliberal ideologies. In demystifying these paradoxes, we advocate more-than approaches that position tensions as opportunities, incorporate both career development and critical communication pedagogy, and transcend through quality control interventions.KEYWORDS: careerssensemakingparadoxescommunication educationapplied tensional approach Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
初出期成年人自相矛盾的职业意义
千禧一代晚期和Z世代的“新成人”质疑高等教育的价值,尤其是在为动荡的劳动力市场、职业和其他不稳定因素做准备方面。我们使用应用张力的方法,透过悖论的构相视角,分析初出期成人对教育-职业-不稳定性组合的理解。我们确定了围绕教育与职业安全和脆弱性的感觉的两个主要悖论:(a)学生认为教育成就直接导致职业成功(金券),与没有保证的理解并存;(b)在自我管理的职业生涯中感到孤立(“一切由我决定”),这与对社交网络的渴望共享空间,但作为他人建立的教育产品,与学生作为消费者和新自由主义意识形态相一致。在消除这些矛盾的过程中,我们提倡的方法不仅仅是将紧张视为机会,结合职业发展和批判性沟通教学法,并通过质量控制干预来超越。关键词:职业、情感、制造悖论、沟通教育、应用张力法披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1