Soil moisture routing modeling of targeted biochar amendment in undulating topographies: an analysis of biochar's effects on streamflow

IF 1.6 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES AIMS Environmental Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/environsci.2023030
Adam O'Keeffe, Erin Brooks, Chad Dunkel, Dev S. Shrestha
{"title":"Soil moisture routing modeling of targeted biochar amendment in undulating topographies: an analysis of biochar's effects on streamflow","authors":"Adam O'Keeffe, Erin Brooks, Chad Dunkel, Dev S. Shrestha","doi":"10.3934/environsci.2023030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<abstract><p>The effect of biochar on hydrologic fluxes was estimated using a single hillslope version of a gridded soil moisture routing (SMR) model. Five grid cells were aligned linearly with varied slopes to simulate a small undulating hillslope with or without a restrictive layer beneath the soil profile. Biochar amendments (redwood sawdust and wheat straw biochar) at concentrations of 0%, 4%, and 7% were applied to the topmost grid-cell by mass of dry soil. Simulated streamflow hydrographs for restricted and non-restricted soil profiles were manually calibrated with measured Palouse River streamflow data. Evapotranspiration, percolation, lateral flow, baseflow, and streamflow were all modeled yearly. Two generally reported field capacities (FC) in literature at −6 and −33 kPa were considered to assess the effect of biochar. Field capacity considered at −6 kPa corresponds to higher moisture content, and hence higher moisture storage capacity between FC and permanent wilting point than at −33 kPa. At −6 kPa FC, biochar effectively increased evapotranspiration and reduced the lateral flow of the system. Increased soil porosity from biochar amendment enhanced the water holding capacity of the soil and plant available water. These mechanisms impacted the streamflow generated from the system indicating positive outcomes from biochar amendment in both restricted and non-restricted soil profiles. Biochar amendment showed an order of magnitude smaller effects with −33 kPa FC compared to −6 kPa FC; the increased porosity appeared to be less influential at lower field capacity values. Additionally, the results showed that the over-application of coarse biochar might negatively affect retaining soil moisture. These findings point to positive results for using biochar as a water management strategy if applied less than 7% in this study, but further exploration is needed to find the optimum level of biochar with different biochar and soil properties.</p></abstract>","PeriodicalId":45143,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2023030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of biochar on hydrologic fluxes was estimated using a single hillslope version of a gridded soil moisture routing (SMR) model. Five grid cells were aligned linearly with varied slopes to simulate a small undulating hillslope with or without a restrictive layer beneath the soil profile. Biochar amendments (redwood sawdust and wheat straw biochar) at concentrations of 0%, 4%, and 7% were applied to the topmost grid-cell by mass of dry soil. Simulated streamflow hydrographs for restricted and non-restricted soil profiles were manually calibrated with measured Palouse River streamflow data. Evapotranspiration, percolation, lateral flow, baseflow, and streamflow were all modeled yearly. Two generally reported field capacities (FC) in literature at −6 and −33 kPa were considered to assess the effect of biochar. Field capacity considered at −6 kPa corresponds to higher moisture content, and hence higher moisture storage capacity between FC and permanent wilting point than at −33 kPa. At −6 kPa FC, biochar effectively increased evapotranspiration and reduced the lateral flow of the system. Increased soil porosity from biochar amendment enhanced the water holding capacity of the soil and plant available water. These mechanisms impacted the streamflow generated from the system indicating positive outcomes from biochar amendment in both restricted and non-restricted soil profiles. Biochar amendment showed an order of magnitude smaller effects with −33 kPa FC compared to −6 kPa FC; the increased porosity appeared to be less influential at lower field capacity values. Additionally, the results showed that the over-application of coarse biochar might negatively affect retaining soil moisture. These findings point to positive results for using biochar as a water management strategy if applied less than 7% in this study, but further exploration is needed to find the optimum level of biochar with different biochar and soil properties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
起伏地形中目标生物炭修正的土壤水分路径模型:生物炭对水流影响的分析
生物炭对水文通量的影响是使用一个单一的坡面网格土壤水分路径(SMR)模型来估计的。五个网格单元与不同的斜坡线性排列,以模拟土壤剖面下有或没有限制层的小起伏山坡。按干土质量将浓度为0%、4%和7%的生物炭改良剂(红木锯末和小麦秸秆生物炭)施用于最上面的网格细胞。模拟的受限和非受限土壤剖面的水流曲线是用实测的帕卢斯河水流数据手动校准的。蒸散发、渗透、侧流、基流和径流都是每年模拟的。文献中两个通常报道的- 6和- 33 kPa的田间容量(FC)被用来评估生物炭的效果。−6 kPa时考虑的现场容量对应较高的含水率,因此比−33 kPa时FC到永久萎蔫点之间的储水容量更高。在−6 kPa FC下,生物炭有效地增加了系统的蒸散量,减少了系统的侧流量。生物炭改性提高了土壤孔隙度,提高了土壤和植物有效水分的持水量。这些机制影响了系统产生的流量,表明生物炭在限制和非限制土壤剖面中都有积极的结果。与−6 kPa FC相比,−33 kPa FC对生物炭改性的影响要小一个数量级;在较低的现场容量值下,孔隙度增加的影响较小。此外,过量施用粗质生物炭可能对土壤水分保持产生不利影响。这些发现表明,如果在本研究中施用少于7%的生物炭作为水管理策略,将取得积极的结果,但需要进一步探索不同生物炭和土壤性质的最佳生物炭水平。</p> /abstract>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Environmental Science
AIMS Environmental Science ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal analysis of drought occurrence in the Ouergha catchment, Morocco Decolorization of Reactive Red 120 by a novel bacterial consortium: Kinetics and heavy metal inhibition study Are we doing the same? A worldwide analysis of business commitment to the SDGs A Study of Infaunal Abundance, Diversity and Distribution in Chettuva Mangrove, Kerala, India The impacts of multi-stakeholders collaboration on management and mitigation of oil pipeline disasters in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1