At the limits of sustainability: Exploring extended producer responsibility in the management of agrochemical packaging

Q3 Social Sciences Ambiente e Sociedade Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1809-4422asoc0076r1vu2023l3oa
Thiago José Arruda de Oliveira, Letícia Antunes Nogueira, Waldecy Rodrigues
{"title":"At the limits of sustainability: Exploring extended producer responsibility in the management of agrochemical packaging","authors":"Thiago José Arruda de Oliveira, Letícia Antunes Nogueira, Waldecy Rodrigues","doi":"10.1590/1809-4422asoc0076r1vu2023l3oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study discusses the limitations of take-back schemes for agrochemical packaging in promoting sustainability. Through the case of inPEV and the Campo Limpo System, the analysis focused on data from IBGE, IBAMA, and secondary sources. Results show that the system’s organization favors large agricultural producers, particularly in the soybean chain, while small producers are marginalized. Although this strategy allows for high rates of collection, a crucial shortcoming refers to environment and health related effects on family farms. This is embodied in the dilemma that take-back schemes for agrochemical packaging are necessary in terms of adequate waste management, but can create conditions that institutionalize the use of agrochemicals and legitimize their increasing application. Consequently, sustainability in food production systems is a complex and multidimensional affair, which require coordinated effort of civil society, public authorities, and producers.","PeriodicalId":35241,"journal":{"name":"Ambiente e Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambiente e Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc0076r1vu2023l3oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The study discusses the limitations of take-back schemes for agrochemical packaging in promoting sustainability. Through the case of inPEV and the Campo Limpo System, the analysis focused on data from IBGE, IBAMA, and secondary sources. Results show that the system’s organization favors large agricultural producers, particularly in the soybean chain, while small producers are marginalized. Although this strategy allows for high rates of collection, a crucial shortcoming refers to environment and health related effects on family farms. This is embodied in the dilemma that take-back schemes for agrochemical packaging are necessary in terms of adequate waste management, but can create conditions that institutionalize the use of agrochemicals and legitimize their increasing application. Consequently, sustainability in food production systems is a complex and multidimensional affair, which require coordinated effort of civil society, public authorities, and producers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在可持续性的极限:探索扩大生产者责任在农化包装管理
摘要:本研究讨论了农化包装回收方案在促进可持续性方面的局限性。通过inPEV和Campo Limpo系统的案例,分析的重点是来自IBGE、IBAMA和二手来源的数据。结果表明,该系统的组织有利于大型农业生产者,特别是在大豆链中,而小生产者被边缘化。虽然这一战略允许高收集率,但一个关键缺点是对家庭农场的环境和健康影响。这体现在农用化学品包装的回收计划在适当的废物管理方面是必要的,但可以创造条件使农用化学品的使用制度化并使其日益增加的应用合法化。因此,粮食生产系统的可持续性是一个复杂和多方面的问题,需要民间社会、公共当局和生产者的协调努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ambiente e Sociedade
Ambiente e Sociedade Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Ambiente & Sociedade é uma publicação cuatrimestral da ANPPAS-Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ambiente e Sociedade, que busca contribuir con la producción del conocimiento en la interfaz de las cuestiones del Ambiente y la Sociedad. Publica textos de colaboradores nacionales e internacionales, mediante evaluación de los editores y pareceres emitidos por asesores ad hoc. La revista publica artículos teóricos y reseñas de libros inéditos em el área interdisciplinar que trata del proceso de interacción entre Sociedad y Medio Ambiente.
期刊最新文献
O que faz uma comunicação de risco ser eficiente? A visão dos envolvidos Zonas de Sacrificio y Recuperación Socioambiental en Chile: Fallas y oportunidades de la política ambiental Panorama das Leis de Agricultura Urbana no Brasil: Relações com o Planejamento Urbano At the limits of sustainability: Exploring extended producer responsibility in the management of agrochemical packaging Overview of Laws for Urban Agriculture in Brazil: Association with Urban Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1