Does digitalization mitigate regional inequalities? Evidence from China

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2023.09.007
Haimeng Liu , Xinyang Wang , Zheye Wang , Yu Cheng
{"title":"Does digitalization mitigate regional inequalities? Evidence from China","authors":"Haimeng Liu ,&nbsp;Xinyang Wang ,&nbsp;Zheye Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2023.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Regional inequality significantly influences sustainable development and human well-being. In China, there exists pronounced regional disparities in economic and digital advancements; however, scant research delves into the interplay between them. By analyzing the economic development and digitalization gaps at regional and city levels in China, extending the original Cobb-Douglas production function, this study aims to evaluate the impact of digitalization on China’s regional inequality using seemingly unrelated regression. The results indicate a greater emphasis on digital inequality compared to economic disparity, with variable coefficients of 0.59 for GDP per capita and 0.92 for the digitalization index over the past four years. However, GDP per capita demonstrates higher spatial concentration than digitalization. Notably, both disparities have shown a gradual reduction in recent years. The southeastern region of the Hu Huanyong Line exhibits superior levels and rates of economic and digital advancement in contrast to the northwestern region. While digitalization propels economic growth, it yields a nuanced impact on achieving balanced regional development, encompassing both positive and negative facets. Our study highlights that the marginal utility of advancing digitalization is more pronounced in less developed regions, but only if the government invests in the digital infrastructure and education in these areas. This study’s methodology can be utilized for subsequent research, and our findings hold the potential to the government’s regional investment and policy-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 52-63"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000640/pdfft?md5=6ed4688e020c8f01dbf957124dec1f0d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666683923000640-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional inequality significantly influences sustainable development and human well-being. In China, there exists pronounced regional disparities in economic and digital advancements; however, scant research delves into the interplay between them. By analyzing the economic development and digitalization gaps at regional and city levels in China, extending the original Cobb-Douglas production function, this study aims to evaluate the impact of digitalization on China’s regional inequality using seemingly unrelated regression. The results indicate a greater emphasis on digital inequality compared to economic disparity, with variable coefficients of 0.59 for GDP per capita and 0.92 for the digitalization index over the past four years. However, GDP per capita demonstrates higher spatial concentration than digitalization. Notably, both disparities have shown a gradual reduction in recent years. The southeastern region of the Hu Huanyong Line exhibits superior levels and rates of economic and digital advancement in contrast to the northwestern region. While digitalization propels economic growth, it yields a nuanced impact on achieving balanced regional development, encompassing both positive and negative facets. Our study highlights that the marginal utility of advancing digitalization is more pronounced in less developed regions, but only if the government invests in the digital infrastructure and education in these areas. This study’s methodology can be utilized for subsequent research, and our findings hold the potential to the government’s regional investment and policy-making.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化能否缓解地区不平等?来自中国的证据
地区不平等严重影响着可持续发展和人类福祉。在中国,经济和数字化发展存在着明显的地区差异,但很少有研究深入探讨二者之间的相互作用。本研究通过分析中国区域和城市层面的经济发展和数字化差距,扩展了原有的柯布-道格拉斯生产函数,旨在利用看似不相关的回归评估数字化对中国区域不平等的影响。结果表明,与经济差距相比,数字化不平等更受重视,在过去四年中,人均 GDP 和数字化指数的变量系数分别为 0.59 和 0.92。不过,人均 GDP 的空间集中度要高于数字化。值得注意的是,近年来这两个差距都在逐步缩小。与西北部地区相比,胡焕庸线东南部地区的经济和数字化发展水平和速度更胜一筹。数字化在推动经济增长的同时,也对实现区域平衡发展产生了微妙的影响,既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面。我们的研究强调,推进数字化的边际效用在欠发达地区更为明显,但前提是政府必须投资于这些地区的数字化基础设施和教育。本研究的方法可用于后续研究,我们的研究结果也有望为政府的地区投资和政策制定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
Long-term stability in protected-areas? A vision from American/New World amphibians Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity and ecosystem services in protected and non-protected oak forest areas can inform climate smart conservation Global sustainable agriculture and land management systems Evolution and customisation of the RegCM model for urban climate studies: Addressing multifaceted challenges and advancing climate science Ecosystem services potential and soil conservation policies with emphasis on degraded pastures in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1