Des civilisations du végétal préhistoriques sous les tropiques ?

IF 0.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropologie Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anthro.2023.103192
Hermine Xhauflair , Antoine Lourdeau , Dylan Gaffney , Anne Ford , Daud Tanudirjo , Sheldon Clyde Jago-on
{"title":"Des civilisations du végétal préhistoriques sous les tropiques ?","authors":"Hermine Xhauflair ,&nbsp;Antoine Lourdeau ,&nbsp;Dylan Gaffney ,&nbsp;Anne Ford ,&nbsp;Daud Tanudirjo ,&nbsp;Sheldon Clyde Jago-on","doi":"10.1016/j.anthro.2023.103192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Did a toolkit made of plants exist in tropical forests during prehistory? If so, what was its impact on lithic technology? In Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea, the “simplicity” of lithic industries has been interpreted as the reflection of a technical investment in another material: bamboo. The material clues, including traces of wear and residues on lithic artefacts, show that if a perishable material culture did exist, in the Philippines and in New Guinea, the Bamboo Hypothesis must be nuanced and extended to the plant world in the broad sense. Various plants have been exploited, including palm, to carry out activities that go beyond the manufacture of bamboo knives and arrows: splitting of rigid plants, fibre processing, manufacturing of ropes or baskets. If the relationship with the forest is developed on all continents and combines botanical knowledge, anthropogenization of the landscape and hunting of arboreal animals, its impact on lithics toolkits varies. In South America, stone tools become rarer in forest environment and the operating sequences become simpler. On the contrary, lithic industries of Africa and Sri Lanka show great technical know-how and are characterized by great standardization. Living in the rainforest does not necessarily imply abandoning the mineral to focus on plants and the part of cultural choices was large. A prehistoric plant technology is increasingly attested in Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea thanks to use-wear analyses but remains to be demonstrated in other tropical regions of the world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46860,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie","volume":"127 4","pages":"Article 103192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552123000894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Did a toolkit made of plants exist in tropical forests during prehistory? If so, what was its impact on lithic technology? In Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea, the “simplicity” of lithic industries has been interpreted as the reflection of a technical investment in another material: bamboo. The material clues, including traces of wear and residues on lithic artefacts, show that if a perishable material culture did exist, in the Philippines and in New Guinea, the Bamboo Hypothesis must be nuanced and extended to the plant world in the broad sense. Various plants have been exploited, including palm, to carry out activities that go beyond the manufacture of bamboo knives and arrows: splitting of rigid plants, fibre processing, manufacturing of ropes or baskets. If the relationship with the forest is developed on all continents and combines botanical knowledge, anthropogenization of the landscape and hunting of arboreal animals, its impact on lithics toolkits varies. In South America, stone tools become rarer in forest environment and the operating sequences become simpler. On the contrary, lithic industries of Africa and Sri Lanka show great technical know-how and are characterized by great standardization. Living in the rainforest does not necessarily imply abandoning the mineral to focus on plants and the part of cultural choices was large. A prehistoric plant technology is increasingly attested in Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea thanks to use-wear analyses but remains to be demonstrated in other tropical regions of the world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热带地区的史前植物文明?
史前时期的热带森林中有植物工具吗?如果是,它对岩石技术有什么影响?在东南亚和巴布亚新几内亚,岩石工业的“简单性”被解释为对另一种材料竹子的技术投资的反映。物质证据,包括岩石文物上的磨损和残留痕迹,表明,虽然在菲律宾和新几内亚确实存在易腐物质文化,但竹子的假设必须加以调整,并扩展到更广泛的植物世界。各种各样的植物,特别是棕榈树,已经被开发出来进行活动,而不仅仅是制造竹刀和箭:劈开坚硬的植物,加工纤维,制造绳子或篮子。在所有大陆上,虽然与森林的关系是特权的,并结合了植物学知识、景观的人类化和对树木动物的狩猎,但它对工具的影响是不同的。在南美洲,石制工具在森林环境中越来越少,操作链也越来越简单。相比之下,非洲和斯里兰卡的工业表现出高度的技术专长和高度的标准化。生活在热带雨林并不一定意味着放弃矿物而专注于植物,文化选择的份额是很大的。通过地道学分析,史前植物技术在东南亚和巴布亚新几内亚越来越多地得到证实,但在世界其他热带地区仍有待证明。在史前时期,热带雨林中有植物工具包吗?如果是,它对锂技术有什么影响?在东南亚和巴布亚新几内亚,石工业的“简洁性”被解释为对另一种材料——竹子的技术投资的反映。材料线索,包括石制品上的磨损痕迹和残渣,表明如果在菲律宾和新几内亚存在一种易腐烂的材料文化,那么竹子假说必须加以区分,并在更广泛的意义上扩展到植物世界。已经开发了各种各样的植物,包括棕榈,以开展除制造竹刀和箭以外的活动:劈开刚性植物、加工纤维、制造绳索或篮子。如果在所有大陆上都发展了与森林的关系,并结合了植物学知识、景观的人为化和对树木动物的狩猎,那么它对lithics工具包的影响是多种多样的。在南美洲,石制工具在森林环境中越来越少,操作顺序也越来越简单。相比之下,非洲和斯里兰卡的石料工业显示出巨大的技术专长和巨大的标准化。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,该地区的总面积为,其中土地和(2.641平方公里)水。由于使用分析,一种史前植物技术在东南亚和巴布亚新几内亚得到越来越多的证实,但在世界其他热带地区还有待展示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropologie
Anthropologie ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: First published in 1890, Anthropologie remains one of the most important journals devoted to prehistoric sciences and paleoanthropology. It regularly publishes thematic issues, originalsarticles and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Les monuments funéraires et cultuels du Sahara central (Algérie) : définitions et classifications Une sépulture mésolithique douteuse sans relation archéo-stratigraphique dans la grotte du Rond-du-Barry (Polignac, Haute-Loire, France) Deux cas de façonnage dentaire rituel au Néolithique en Europe. Dolmen A1 de la nécropole de Chenon (Charente, France) A “shaman” burial from the PPNA settlement of Çemka Höyük, Upper Tigris Basin, Turkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1