External validation of SAPS II score reported to the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR)

Q3 Medicine Norsk Epidemiologi Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5618
Eirik Alnes Buanes, Øyvind Bruserud, Sergio Carracedo Huroz, Andreas Barratt-Due, Hans Flaatten, Reidar Kvåle
{"title":"External validation of SAPS II score reported to the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR)","authors":"Eirik Alnes Buanes, Øyvind Bruserud, Sergio Carracedo Huroz, Andreas Barratt-Due, Hans Flaatten, Reidar Kvåle","doi":"10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) is a mortality prediction model widely usedto compensate for differences between intensive care units (ICU) in benchmarking and research. Accuracyof SAPS II is sparsely documented. We investigate accuracy by comparing patient journal SAPS II valueswith registry SAPS II values in the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR).Method: NIPaR personnel collected data from the patient journal during visitations to ICUs in ten differenthospitals between 2017 and 2022 while blinded for registry SAPS II data. The patient journal SAPS II valueswere subsequently compared with the registry SAPS II values.Results: Difference of means for SAPS II score between patient journal and registry data was 5.2 points(95% CI 2.8–7.6; p < 0.001). SAPS II score depended significantly on ICU (p < 0.001) and data origin (p =0.006), whereas the interaction term for these two variables was not significant.Conclusion: We find low accuracy of SAPS II score in a registry setting.","PeriodicalId":35548,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Epidemiologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Epidemiologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) is a mortality prediction model widely usedto compensate for differences between intensive care units (ICU) in benchmarking and research. Accuracyof SAPS II is sparsely documented. We investigate accuracy by comparing patient journal SAPS II valueswith registry SAPS II values in the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR).Method: NIPaR personnel collected data from the patient journal during visitations to ICUs in ten differenthospitals between 2017 and 2022 while blinded for registry SAPS II data. The patient journal SAPS II valueswere subsequently compared with the registry SAPS II values.Results: Difference of means for SAPS II score between patient journal and registry data was 5.2 points(95% CI 2.8–7.6; p < 0.001). SAPS II score depended significantly on ICU (p < 0.001) and data origin (p =0.006), whereas the interaction term for these two variables was not significant.Conclusion: We find low accuracy of SAPS II score in a registry setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向挪威重症监护和大流行登记处(NIPaR)报告的SAPS II评分的外部验证
背景:简化急性生理评分II (SAPS II)是一种死亡率预测模型,广泛用于弥补重症监护病房(ICU)在基准和研究方面的差异。SAPS II的准确性文献很少。我们通过比较患者日记的SAPS II值与挪威重症监护和流行病登记处(NIPaR)的SAPS II值来调查准确性。方法:NIPaR工作人员在2017年至2022年期间从10家不同医院的icu就诊患者日记中收集数据,采用盲法获取注册SAPS II数据。随后将患者日记的SAPS II值与注册表的SAPS II值进行比较。结果:患者日记和登记数据之间SAPS II评分的均值差异为5.2分(95% CI 2.8-7.6;p & lt;0.001)。SAPS II评分与ICU有显著相关性(p <0.001)和数据来源(p =0.006),而这两个变量的相互作用项不显著。结论:我们发现在注册表设置中SAPS II评分的准确性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Norsk Epidemiologi
Norsk Epidemiologi Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of longitudinal surveillance of individuals with CP in Norway; a 20-year quality registry and follow-up program perspective Nasjonalt register for gastrokirurgi (NORGAST): noen tanker etter ti år External validation of SAPS II score reported to the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR) MS-registeret: meget viktig for MS-pasientene og enda viktigere fremover Et lederperspektiv – nytten av medisinske kvalitetsregistre og hvordan vi bruker disse i forbedringsarbeid og praksisendring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1