An evaluation of the effects of dietary mixed-species direct-fed microbial (probiotic) on growth performance, gas emissions, meat quality, nutrient digestibility, and fecal score in finishing pigs

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Canadian Journal of Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1139/cjas-2023-0043
Sumaya Tanzin Wahid, In Ho Kim
{"title":"An evaluation of the effects of dietary mixed-species direct-fed microbial (probiotic) on growth performance, gas emissions, meat quality, nutrient digestibility, and fecal score in finishing pigs","authors":"Sumaya Tanzin Wahid, In Ho Kim","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2023-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effects of mixed-species direct-fed microbial (DFM) on growth performance, gas emissions, meat quality, nutrient digestibility, and the fecal score of finishing pigs. A total of 100 crossbred finishing pigs ((Yorkshire × Landrace) × Duroc) weighing 58.97 ± 3.12 kg were randomly assigned to one of two diets (5 pigs per pen (2 barrows and 3 gilts); 50 pigs per treatment) in an 8-week trial. Dietary treatments comprised of the basal diet without probiotics control or basal diet + (0.1%) mixed probiotics (DFM). Mixed DFM supplementation showed a tendency to increase ( P = 0.093) the body weight of finishing pigs during day 56. Comparing mixed DFM with the control diet, mixed probiotics significantly improved average daily gain (ADG) during weeks 5–8 ( P = 0.024) and overall ( P = 0.013). DFM-supplemented diets reduced the emission of CH 4 and NH 3 significantly at weeks 4 and 8 compared with control. DFM supplementation did not affect H 2 S, methyl mercaptans, acetic acid, or CO 2 emissions. Mixed DFM supplementation showed a tendency to increase ( P = 0.07) nitrogen digestibility. Pigs receiving mixed DFM had improved ADG and reduced NH 3 and CH 4 emissions without affecting meat quality, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbes, and fecal score.","PeriodicalId":9512,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2023-0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effects of mixed-species direct-fed microbial (DFM) on growth performance, gas emissions, meat quality, nutrient digestibility, and the fecal score of finishing pigs. A total of 100 crossbred finishing pigs ((Yorkshire × Landrace) × Duroc) weighing 58.97 ± 3.12 kg were randomly assigned to one of two diets (5 pigs per pen (2 barrows and 3 gilts); 50 pigs per treatment) in an 8-week trial. Dietary treatments comprised of the basal diet without probiotics control or basal diet + (0.1%) mixed probiotics (DFM). Mixed DFM supplementation showed a tendency to increase ( P = 0.093) the body weight of finishing pigs during day 56. Comparing mixed DFM with the control diet, mixed probiotics significantly improved average daily gain (ADG) during weeks 5–8 ( P = 0.024) and overall ( P = 0.013). DFM-supplemented diets reduced the emission of CH 4 and NH 3 significantly at weeks 4 and 8 compared with control. DFM supplementation did not affect H 2 S, methyl mercaptans, acetic acid, or CO 2 emissions. Mixed DFM supplementation showed a tendency to increase ( P = 0.07) nitrogen digestibility. Pigs receiving mixed DFM had improved ADG and reduced NH 3 and CH 4 emissions without affecting meat quality, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbes, and fecal score.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲粮混合种直接饲喂微生物(益生菌)对育肥猪生长性能、气体排放、肉品质、营养物质消化率和粪便评分的影响
本试验旨在研究混合种直接饲喂微生物(DFM)对育肥猪生长性能、气体排放、肉品质、营养物质消化率和粪便评分的影响。试验选用100头体重为58.97±3.12 kg的杂交育肥猪((约克×长)×杜洛克),随机饲喂2种饲粮(每栏5头猪(2个母猪和3个后备母猪);每次处理50头猪),为期8周的试验。饲粮处理包括基础饲粮不加益生菌控制或基础饲粮+(0.1%)混合益生菌(DFM)。混合添加DFM有增加育肥猪第56天体重的趋势(P = 0.093)。与对照组相比,混合益生菌显著提高了第5-8周的平均日增重(P = 0.024)和总体(P = 0.013)。与对照组相比,添加dfm的饲粮在第4周和第8周显著降低了甲烷和nh3的排放。补充DFM不影响h2s、甲基硫醇、乙酸或二氧化碳的排放。混合添加DFM有提高氮消化率的趋势(P = 0.07)。饲喂混合DFM的猪在不影响肉质、营养物质消化率、肠道微生物和粪便评分的情况下,提高了平均日增重,减少了nh3和ch4排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Canadian Journal of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1957, this quarterly journal contains new research on all aspects of animal agriculture and animal products, including breeding and genetics; cellular and molecular biology; growth and development; meat science; modelling animal systems; physiology and endocrinology; ruminant nutrition; non-ruminant nutrition; and welfare, behaviour, and management. It also publishes reviews, letters to the editor, abstracts of technical papers presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Animal Science, and occasionally conference proceedings.
期刊最新文献
Simulation of loading and unloading through ramps of different configuration: effects on the ease of handling and physiological response of pigs of two slaughter weights Comparative impact of conventional and alternative gut health management programs on plasma and tibia attributes in broiler chickens raised in commercial and research settings Characterization of First Cut Alfalfa and Grass Silage Management Practices on Canadian Dairy Farms A Review of Foot-Related Lameness in Feedlot Cattle Complete replacement of soybean meal with black soldier fly larvae meal in feeding program for broiler chickens from placement through to 49 days of age: impact on gastrointestinal, breast, skeletal, plasma, and litter attributes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1