Emotional intelligence and leadership styles: a case study of school heads in Pakistan

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Leadership in Education Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/13603124.2023.2276888
Aisha Naz Ansari, Muhammad Mujtaba Asad
{"title":"Emotional intelligence and leadership styles: a case study of school heads in Pakistan","authors":"Aisha Naz Ansari, Muhammad Mujtaba Asad","doi":"10.1080/13603124.2023.2276888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn the contemprory education system, school effectivenessanticipates teacher dedication, sense of responsibilty, and team spirit. Such a soft shift in perspectives urges school leaders to reshape their administrative roles to architects of a conducive environment for ensuring the fulfilment of school goals and the promotion of teacher well-being. Arguably, this shift stipulates extended competencies of leadership, namely interpersonal and intrapersonal, which are the essential traits and competencies of Emotional Intelligence (EI). Therefore, this paper presents school heads’ perceived levels of emotional intelligence and the influence of EI on practiced leadership styles. A phenomenological case study was employed with representative cases of five schools. The sample comprised both school heads (n = 5) and teachers (n = 10). Data were collected using four methods, namely semi-structured interviews with teachers and school heads; shadowing of school heads’ to observe their behaviours; a web-based emotional intelligence test to assess school head’ perceived EI; and a self-assessment questionnaire of leadership styles. The findings highlight weak levels of emotional intelligence among school heads. The frequently preferred leadership styles include authoritarian and transactional which underscores a notably weak emotional intelligence integration in leadership practices. However, the sentiments of school heads and teachers varied, because the former considered leadership as their right to rule the team, while the latter found a disconnection between school heads and teachers and a concern for teacher well-being. The findings imply the urgent need to improve the EI of school heads to ensure teacher well-being. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAisha Naz AnsariAisha Naz Ansari is a graduate of B.Ed (Hons.) from Sukkur IBA University and holds an MPhil in Education from AKU-IED. She currently works as a Research Associate on a large-scale study at Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Pakistan. She has published more than fifteen (15) research articles and research blogs in international and national journals and forums. Her research areas include systematic reviews, educational technology, educational psychology, teacher education, public-private partnerships, and classroom teaching and learning.Muhammad Mujtaba AsadDr. Muhammad Mujtaba Asad is serving as an Assistant Professor and Lead Researcher of Educational Technologies and TVET Research at Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan. Dr. Mujtaba has national and international working experience of more than 15 years in the industrialand educational sector in the domain of Educational Technologies in TVET, Work and Product-Based Industrial Education, and Competency-Based Education in TVET. Dr. Mujtaba has published more than seventy (70) research articles (WoS & Scopus Indexed) in reputed international journals and conferences worldwide. Also, two books related to the observational skills of competent educators and Innovative technologies in 21 st Century Education under the CS and T&F publishing house USA are in his publication credit.","PeriodicalId":46848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Leadership in Education","volume":"2016 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Leadership in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2276888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn the contemprory education system, school effectivenessanticipates teacher dedication, sense of responsibilty, and team spirit. Such a soft shift in perspectives urges school leaders to reshape their administrative roles to architects of a conducive environment for ensuring the fulfilment of school goals and the promotion of teacher well-being. Arguably, this shift stipulates extended competencies of leadership, namely interpersonal and intrapersonal, which are the essential traits and competencies of Emotional Intelligence (EI). Therefore, this paper presents school heads’ perceived levels of emotional intelligence and the influence of EI on practiced leadership styles. A phenomenological case study was employed with representative cases of five schools. The sample comprised both school heads (n = 5) and teachers (n = 10). Data were collected using four methods, namely semi-structured interviews with teachers and school heads; shadowing of school heads’ to observe their behaviours; a web-based emotional intelligence test to assess school head’ perceived EI; and a self-assessment questionnaire of leadership styles. The findings highlight weak levels of emotional intelligence among school heads. The frequently preferred leadership styles include authoritarian and transactional which underscores a notably weak emotional intelligence integration in leadership practices. However, the sentiments of school heads and teachers varied, because the former considered leadership as their right to rule the team, while the latter found a disconnection between school heads and teachers and a concern for teacher well-being. The findings imply the urgent need to improve the EI of school heads to ensure teacher well-being. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAisha Naz AnsariAisha Naz Ansari is a graduate of B.Ed (Hons.) from Sukkur IBA University and holds an MPhil in Education from AKU-IED. She currently works as a Research Associate on a large-scale study at Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Pakistan. She has published more than fifteen (15) research articles and research blogs in international and national journals and forums. Her research areas include systematic reviews, educational technology, educational psychology, teacher education, public-private partnerships, and classroom teaching and learning.Muhammad Mujtaba AsadDr. Muhammad Mujtaba Asad is serving as an Assistant Professor and Lead Researcher of Educational Technologies and TVET Research at Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan. Dr. Mujtaba has national and international working experience of more than 15 years in the industrialand educational sector in the domain of Educational Technologies in TVET, Work and Product-Based Industrial Education, and Competency-Based Education in TVET. Dr. Mujtaba has published more than seventy (70) research articles (WoS & Scopus Indexed) in reputed international journals and conferences worldwide. Also, two books related to the observational skills of competent educators and Innovative technologies in 21 st Century Education under the CS and T&F publishing house USA are in his publication credit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情商和领导风格:巴基斯坦学校校长的案例研究
在当代教育体系中,学校的有效性需要教师的奉献精神、责任感和团队精神。这种观点上的软转变促使学校领导重塑他们的行政角色,成为确保学校目标实现和促进教师福祉的有利环境的建筑师。可以说,这种转变规定了扩展的领导能力,即人际和内部关系,这是情商(EI)的基本特征和能力。因此,本文提出了校长的情绪智力感知水平和情商对实践领导风格的影响。采用现象学的案例研究方法,选取了五个学派的代表性案例。样本包括校长(n = 5)和教师(n = 10)。数据收集采用四种方法,即与教师和校长进行半结构化访谈;跟随校长观察他们的行为;基于网络的情绪智力测试评估校长的感知EI;以及一份关于领导风格的自我评估问卷。研究结果突出表明,学校校长的情商水平较低。最受欢迎的领导风格包括威权主义和交易型,这凸显了在领导实践中情商整合的明显薄弱。然而,校长和教师的情绪不同,因为前者认为领导是他们统治团队的权利,而后者发现校长和教师之间的脱节,关心教师的福祉。研究结果表明,提高学校校长的情商,以确保教师的福祉是迫切需要的。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。saisha Naz Ansari毕业于苏库尔国际工商管理学院(Sukkur IBA University),获得荣誉学士学位,并在AKU-IED获得教育学硕士学位。她目前在巴基斯坦阿迦汗大学教育发展研究所担任一项大规模研究的助理研究员。她在国际和国内期刊和论坛上发表了超过15篇研究文章和研究博客。她的研究领域包括系统评论、教育技术、教育心理学、教师教育、公私合作以及课堂教学。穆罕默德·穆吉塔巴Muhammad Mujtaba Asad是巴基斯坦苏库尔IBA大学的助理教授和教育技术与职业技术培训研究的首席研究员。Mujtaba博士在TVET教育技术、基于工作和产品的工业教育以及基于能力的TVET教育领域的工业和教育部门拥有超过15年的国内和国际工作经验。Mujtaba博士在全球知名国际期刊和会议上发表了70多篇研究论文(WoS和Scopus索引)。美国CS和T&F出版社出版的《胜任教育者的观察技巧》和《21世纪教育的创新技术》两本专著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Leadership in Education
International Journal of Leadership in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory & Practice is an international journal for the publication of theoretical and practical discussions of educational leadership. The Journal presents: •cutting-edge writing on educational leadership, including instructional supervision, curriculum and teaching development, staff development, educational administration and more; •an alternative voice: reports of alternative theoretical perspectives, alternative methodologies, and alternative experiences of leadership; •a broad definition of leadership, including teachers-as-leaders, shared governance, site-based decision making, and community-school collaborations.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 and school leadership: a tale of transition Women cannibalized! The troubling link between Queen Bees and mentoring in Pakistani academia The view of leadership on teaching newly arrived migrant students in preschools and schools A review of empirical studies of co-principalship: antecedents, constellation-level outcomes and the issue of trust Enhancing affective commitment through transcendental leadership: unveiling the influence of altruistic mindset and intrinsic motivation in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1