Touching Back while Black: Self-Defence and the Politics of Black US Citizenship in Paul Green’s In Abraham’s Bosom

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 THEATER MODERN DRAMA Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3138/md-66-3-1086
Angela M. Farr Schiller
{"title":"Touching Back while Black: Self-Defence and the Politics of Black US Citizenship in Paul Green’s <i>In Abraham’s Bosom</i>","authors":"Angela M. Farr Schiller","doi":"10.3138/md-66-3-1086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the critical methods of performance studies, critical race studies, and sensorial studies, this article analyses the creation of social identities through the rubric of touch – a tactile sensibility that provides a cultural foundation for the mis perception of bodies as racialized subjects. Touch has been an under-researched and under-utilized methodology for understanding how race works. Specifically attending to the historical period of Jim Crow in the early twentieth century because of its deeply held investments in the politics of separateness, this article examines Paul Green’s 1926 Pulitzer Prize–winning play In Abraham’s Bosom as one of the rare dramas during this period that actually showed Black acts of touching back on the stage. Green challenges his audience to contend with an oppressive Jim Crow racial regime that forced African Americans to establish alternative modes of freedom outside of more traditional expressions of autonomy and citizenship. Reading Green’s work in this way allows for a consideration of the differing strategies at play in the fight toward equality for Black Americans. Taking up tactility, in the context of the United States, as a cultural system used to mark bodies as raced and weaponized to uphold white supremacy, this essay approaches touch as a performative act that is meaningful, effective, and consequential, thereby grappling with the present ways that American society underestimates the social, political, and cultural power that touch wields in our understanding of social identities.","PeriodicalId":43301,"journal":{"name":"MODERN DRAMA","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/md-66-3-1086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the critical methods of performance studies, critical race studies, and sensorial studies, this article analyses the creation of social identities through the rubric of touch – a tactile sensibility that provides a cultural foundation for the mis perception of bodies as racialized subjects. Touch has been an under-researched and under-utilized methodology for understanding how race works. Specifically attending to the historical period of Jim Crow in the early twentieth century because of its deeply held investments in the politics of separateness, this article examines Paul Green’s 1926 Pulitzer Prize–winning play In Abraham’s Bosom as one of the rare dramas during this period that actually showed Black acts of touching back on the stage. Green challenges his audience to contend with an oppressive Jim Crow racial regime that forced African Americans to establish alternative modes of freedom outside of more traditional expressions of autonomy and citizenship. Reading Green’s work in this way allows for a consideration of the differing strategies at play in the fight toward equality for Black Americans. Taking up tactility, in the context of the United States, as a cultural system used to mark bodies as raced and weaponized to uphold white supremacy, this essay approaches touch as a performative act that is meaningful, effective, and consequential, thereby grappling with the present ways that American society underestimates the social, political, and cultural power that touch wields in our understanding of social identities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在保罗·格林的《在亚伯拉罕的怀抱》中,黑人的自卫和美国黑人公民身份的政治
本文结合表演研究、批判种族研究和感官研究的批判方法,以触觉为主题来分析社会身份的创造——触觉的敏感性为将身体误解为种族化的主体提供了文化基础。对于理解种族是如何运作的,触摸一直是一种研究不足、利用不足的方法。特别关注20世纪早期种族隔离的历史时期,因为它对分离政治的深刻投入,本文研究了保罗·格林1926年普利策奖获奖戏剧《在亚伯拉罕的怀里》,作为这一时期少有的戏剧之一,它实际上表现了黑人在舞台上的触摸行为。格林要求他的听众与压迫性的吉姆·克劳(Jim Crow)种族制度抗争,这种制度迫使非裔美国人在更传统的自治和公民身份表达之外建立另一种自由模式。以这种方式阅读格林的作品,可以考虑在争取美国黑人平等的斗争中发挥作用的不同策略。在美国的背景下,触觉作为一种文化体系,被用来将身体标记为种族和武器化,以维护白人至上主义,本文将触摸视为一种有意义、有效和后果的表演行为,从而与美国社会低估触摸在我们对社会身份的理解中所发挥的社会、政治和文化力量的当前方式作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MODERN DRAMA
MODERN DRAMA THEATER-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects Using Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap. Sergio Blanco’s Tebas Land: Staging an Authentic Fiction The “Nature of Theatre”: Herder’s Pursuit of a Human Theatre Josephine Lee. Oriental, Black, and White: The Formation of Racial Habits in American Theater Barry Day, ed. Noël Coward on (and in) Theatre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1