Prediction model for the need of postoperative organ support in an adult population undergoing elective major general surgery - Utilizing the American College of Surgeons - National quality improvement project (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.4038/slja.v31i2.9243
Kavya Galle Kankanamge Botejue, Aloka Pathirana, Shamini Prathapan
{"title":"Prediction model for the need of postoperative organ support in an adult population undergoing elective major general surgery - Utilizing the American College of Surgeons - National quality improvement project (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator","authors":"Kavya Galle Kankanamge Botejue, Aloka Pathirana, Shamini Prathapan","doi":"10.4038/slja.v31i2.9243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An accepted model for predicting the need for postoperative organ support and intensive care, in patients undergoing elective surgery, is lacking worldwide. A reliable tool that could predict the need for postoperative organ support would facilitate the efficient utilisation of ICU beds while ensuring patient safety. The American College of Surgeons - National Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator is validated for the prediction of the risk of serious complications in the postoperative period. We aimed to validate this calculator to predict the need for post-operative organ support. We obtained perioperative data from 126 patients who underwent elective major general surgery. We calculated the percentage risk of serious complications for each patient using the ACS-NSQIP calculator and correlated it with the level of postoperative organ support needed. The mean predicted percentage risk of serious complications, for the group that did not require any organ support was 10.5% and the group requiring 1 or more organ support was 18.1%. The standard error was 0.49 (p= 0.001). A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve gave an area under the curve of 0.71. We chose a cutoff for the percentage risk of serious complications for needing postoperative organ support and 10.8% was chosen as a fair value as it had a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 66%. The percentage risk of serious complications calculated by the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator has a strong positive correlation with the need for postoperative organ support. Multi-center data is needed to determine definite cut-offs.","PeriodicalId":41531,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/slja.v31i2.9243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An accepted model for predicting the need for postoperative organ support and intensive care, in patients undergoing elective surgery, is lacking worldwide. A reliable tool that could predict the need for postoperative organ support would facilitate the efficient utilisation of ICU beds while ensuring patient safety. The American College of Surgeons - National Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator is validated for the prediction of the risk of serious complications in the postoperative period. We aimed to validate this calculator to predict the need for post-operative organ support. We obtained perioperative data from 126 patients who underwent elective major general surgery. We calculated the percentage risk of serious complications for each patient using the ACS-NSQIP calculator and correlated it with the level of postoperative organ support needed. The mean predicted percentage risk of serious complications, for the group that did not require any organ support was 10.5% and the group requiring 1 or more organ support was 18.1%. The standard error was 0.49 (p= 0.001). A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve gave an area under the curve of 0.71. We chose a cutoff for the percentage risk of serious complications for needing postoperative organ support and 10.8% was chosen as a fair value as it had a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 66%. The percentage risk of serious complications calculated by the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator has a strong positive correlation with the need for postoperative organ support. Multi-center data is needed to determine definite cut-offs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人择期大普外科术后器官支持需求预测模型——利用美国外科医师学会-国家质量改进项目(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器
一个公认的模型预测需要术后器官支持和重症监护,在接受选择性手术的患者,是缺乏世界范围内。一种能够预测术后器官支持需求的可靠工具将促进ICU床位的有效利用,同时确保患者安全。美国外科医师学会-国家质量改进项目(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器用于预测术后严重并发症的风险。我们的目的是验证这个计算器来预测术后器官支持的需求。我们获得了126例接受择期大普外科手术患者的围手术期数据。我们使用ACS-NSQIP计算器计算每位患者发生严重并发症的风险百分比,并将其与术后所需器官支持水平相关联。不需要任何器官支持的组发生严重并发症的平均预测百分比风险为10.5%,需要一种或更多器官支持的组为18.1%。标准误差为0.49 (p= 0.001)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.71。我们为需要术后器官支持的严重并发症的百分比风险选择了一个临界值,10.8%被选为一个公平值,因为它的敏感性为71.4%,特异性为66%。ACS-NSQIP手术风险计算器计算出的严重并发症风险百分比与术后器官支持需求呈正相关。需要多中心数据来确定明确的截止点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Single-Dose Dexmedetomidine on Cough Response During Tracheal Extubation C-MAC VL as Saviour Following Failed Intubation Attempts in an Infant with Huge Hydrocephalous Internal Carotid Artery Blood Flow Response to Anaesthesia, Pneumoperitoneum and Head-Up Tilt During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Clinical Study Anaphylaxis: Unveiling the silent killer Study on Ward-Based Practice of Vasopressor Administration for Patients with Sepsis, in National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1