Concepts, Characterizations, and Cautions: A Public Health Guide and Glossary for Planning Food Environment Measurement

Sarah Boise, Aldo Crossa, Analee J. Etheredge, Edwin M. McCulley, Gina S. Lovasi
{"title":"Concepts, Characterizations, and Cautions: A Public Health Guide and Glossary for Planning Food Environment Measurement","authors":"Sarah Boise, Aldo Crossa, Analee J. Etheredge, Edwin M. McCulley, Gina S. Lovasi","doi":"10.2174/18749445-v16-230821-2023-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is no singular approach to measuring the food environment suitable for all studies. Understanding terminology, methodology, and common issues can provide a foundation for cohesive and convincing findings. Objective: This review is designed to support investigators and teams newly engaged in food environment measurement who are seeking to optimize and justify measurement choices across projects. Methods: This guide defines key terms and provides annotated resources identified as a useful starting point for exploring the food environment literature. The writing team was a multi-institutional academic-practice collaboration, reflecting on measurement experience with food environments and other retail establishments across the US and in New York City. Results: Terms and annotated resources are divided into three sections: food environment constructs, classification and measures, and errors and strategies to reduce errors. Two examples of methods and challenges encountered while measuring the food environment in the context of a US health department are provided. Researchers and practice professionals are directed to the Food Environment Electronic Database Directory (https://www.foodenvironmentdirectory.com/) to compare available data sources for food environment measurement, focused on the US; this resource incorporates annual updates informed by user input and literature reviews. Discussion: Measuring the food environment is complex. This guide serves as a starting point for understanding some of the public health options and challenges for neighborhood food environment measurement. Conclusion: Food environment measures and data sources vary in suitability depending on research and practice objectives. Reducing barriers to navigating existing literature can catalyze new insights and facilitate theoretically-grounded food environment measurement. Classifications: Built Environment, Food Environment","PeriodicalId":38960,"journal":{"name":"Open Public Health Journal","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Public Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/18749445-v16-230821-2023-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no singular approach to measuring the food environment suitable for all studies. Understanding terminology, methodology, and common issues can provide a foundation for cohesive and convincing findings. Objective: This review is designed to support investigators and teams newly engaged in food environment measurement who are seeking to optimize and justify measurement choices across projects. Methods: This guide defines key terms and provides annotated resources identified as a useful starting point for exploring the food environment literature. The writing team was a multi-institutional academic-practice collaboration, reflecting on measurement experience with food environments and other retail establishments across the US and in New York City. Results: Terms and annotated resources are divided into three sections: food environment constructs, classification and measures, and errors and strategies to reduce errors. Two examples of methods and challenges encountered while measuring the food environment in the context of a US health department are provided. Researchers and practice professionals are directed to the Food Environment Electronic Database Directory (https://www.foodenvironmentdirectory.com/) to compare available data sources for food environment measurement, focused on the US; this resource incorporates annual updates informed by user input and literature reviews. Discussion: Measuring the food environment is complex. This guide serves as a starting point for understanding some of the public health options and challenges for neighborhood food environment measurement. Conclusion: Food environment measures and data sources vary in suitability depending on research and practice objectives. Reducing barriers to navigating existing literature can catalyze new insights and facilitate theoretically-grounded food environment measurement. Classifications: Built Environment, Food Environment
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念、特征和注意事项:规划食品环境测量的公共卫生指南和术语表
背景:没有单一的方法来测量食物环境适合所有的研究。理解术语、方法和常见问题可以为有凝聚力和令人信服的发现提供基础。目的:本综述旨在支持新从事食品环境测量的研究人员和团队,他们正在寻求优化和证明跨项目的测量选择。方法:本指南定义了关键术语,并提供了作为探索食品环境文献的有用起点的注释资源。写作团队是一个多机构的学术实践合作,反映了在美国和纽约市的食品环境和其他零售场所的测量经验。结果:术语和标注资源分为食物环境构建、分类与措施、错误与减少错误的策略三个部分。提供了在美国卫生部门的背景下测量食品环境时遇到的两个方法和挑战的例子。研究人员和实践专业人员被引导到食品环境电子数据库目录(https://www.foodenvironmentdirectory.com/),以比较食品环境测量的可用数据源,重点是美国;该资源结合了用户输入和文献综述的年度更新。讨论:测量食物环境是复杂的。本指南可作为了解社区食品环境测量的一些公共卫生选择和挑战的起点。结论:食品环境措施和数据来源的适用性取决于研究和实践目标。减少浏览现有文献的障碍可以催化新的见解,并促进基于理论的食品环境测量。分类:建筑环境、食品环境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Public Health Journal
Open Public Health Journal Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The Open Public Health Journal is an Open Access online journal which publishes original research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, short articles and guest edited single topic issues in the field of public health. Topics covered in this interdisciplinary journal include: public health policy and practice; theory and methods; occupational health and education; epidemiology; social medicine; health services research; ethics; environmental health; adolescent health; AIDS care; mental health care. The Open Public Health Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Manual Lymphatic Drainage with Thai Traditional Massage on Breast Milk Volume, Breast Pain and Engorgement in Post-Cesarean Mothers of Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial HIV/AIDS Risky Behavior Model for LGBT Youth in the Gorontalo Province Evaluation of Adverse Effects after the Second Dose of BNT162b2 Mrna Vaccination for COVID-19: A Survey-based Analysis among Italian Healthcare Workers Awareness among Healthcare Workers regarding Physical Hazards in Dental and Oral Hospitals of Semarang, Indonesia Linear and Nonlinear Associations between Meteorological Variables and the Incidence of Malaria in Zahedan District Southwest of Iran 2000-2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1