Retos y dificultades para los tomadores de decisiones del área de la salud durante la pandemia en Bogotá: perspectiva desde un abordaje fenomenológico interpretativo
Laura Sofía Amador-Perilla, Laura Daniela Forero-Cortés, Aneth Alvarado-Sarmiento, Luis Gonzalo Burgos-Ortiz, Mario Ávila-Daguer, Yazmín Cadena-Camargo
{"title":"Retos y dificultades para los tomadores de decisiones del área de la salud durante la pandemia en Bogotá: perspectiva desde un abordaje fenomenológico interpretativo","authors":"Laura Sofía Amador-Perilla, Laura Daniela Forero-Cortés, Aneth Alvarado-Sarmiento, Luis Gonzalo Burgos-Ortiz, Mario Ávila-Daguer, Yazmín Cadena-Camargo","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><div>The health emergency caused by COVID-19 presented a context of limited scientific evidence, scarcity of resources, and changes in work routines, for which health workers had to adapt to a transformation of medical practice. This study seeks to know in depth the experiences lived by the health professionals and decision makers of the hospital facing the management of the situations posed by the health emergency of COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted qualitative research with a phenomenological interpretative approach. The target population were the decision-making physicians. The tool used was the in-depth open interview. A thematic analysis was carried out according to the author Steiner Kvale, inductive, where an approximation to the interviews was made, finding the preponderant themes in a repeated way, considering them as categories for the analysis. Finally, the information was grouped to carry out its analysis, relating it to the evidence found in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three emerging categories were identified, the first corresponds to organizational changes during the pandemic, the second was organizational culture and the third was mental health perceived by the participants. Our main results were that much of the stress felt by healthcare workers came from making difficult decisions in a context of uncertainty and scarcity of resources. Also, front line workers identify other risk factors that contributed to generate a negative effect on their mental health reflected in some symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, we also showed that these affectations were addressed with various institutional strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the limitation of the national context, collectively developed tools and plans were generated that allowed doctors to free themselves from the burden of situations posed by the health emergency, especially when making decisions, thus reducing risk factors that could threaten their mental health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"54 3","pages":"Pages 509-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745023000902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objective
The health emergency caused by COVID-19 presented a context of limited scientific evidence, scarcity of resources, and changes in work routines, for which health workers had to adapt to a transformation of medical practice. This study seeks to know in depth the experiences lived by the health professionals and decision makers of the hospital facing the management of the situations posed by the health emergency of COVID-19.
Methods
We conducted qualitative research with a phenomenological interpretative approach. The target population were the decision-making physicians. The tool used was the in-depth open interview. A thematic analysis was carried out according to the author Steiner Kvale, inductive, where an approximation to the interviews was made, finding the preponderant themes in a repeated way, considering them as categories for the analysis. Finally, the information was grouped to carry out its analysis, relating it to the evidence found in the literature.
Results
Three emerging categories were identified, the first corresponds to organizational changes during the pandemic, the second was organizational culture and the third was mental health perceived by the participants. Our main results were that much of the stress felt by healthcare workers came from making difficult decisions in a context of uncertainty and scarcity of resources. Also, front line workers identify other risk factors that contributed to generate a negative effect on their mental health reflected in some symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, we also showed that these affectations were addressed with various institutional strategies.
Conclusions
Despite the limitation of the national context, collectively developed tools and plans were generated that allowed doctors to free themselves from the burden of situations posed by the health emergency, especially when making decisions, thus reducing risk factors that could threaten their mental health.
期刊介绍:
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.