The contribution of bank intermediation to economic growth: Empirical evidence from CESEE countries

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Governance and Regulation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22495/jgrv12i4art19
Florije Miftari
{"title":"The contribution of bank intermediation to economic growth: Empirical evidence from CESEE countries","authors":"Florije Miftari","doi":"10.22495/jgrv12i4art19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The financial system is the crucial supporter of economic growth, as it is said to be the “blood” of economic activities. Many studies reveal the role and importance of the financial system in promoting economic development by raising growth through the accumulation and utilization of savings for productive investments (Levine, 2005). However, some studies highlight a negative or non-significant relationship which may differ depending on the sample of countries and the applied methodology, proxy of financial development, time period, etc. Based on the relevance of the topic and on the ongoing debate, the aim of this study is to explore the nexus and contribution of banking intermediation in the economic growth of some Central Eastern and South-Eastern European (CESEE) countries for the period 2010–2020. We use regression methods, ordinary least squares (OLS), and a fixed effect model to investigate the relationship between economic growth and bank intermediation. We measure the development of banking intermediation using banks’ credit to the private sector, credit to government and state-owned enterprises. The research results show that credits provided by banks do not affect economic growth and are in fact negatively related to economic growth, whereas the return on equity is positively related to economic growth.","PeriodicalId":15974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Governance and Regulation","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Governance and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i4art19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The financial system is the crucial supporter of economic growth, as it is said to be the “blood” of economic activities. Many studies reveal the role and importance of the financial system in promoting economic development by raising growth through the accumulation and utilization of savings for productive investments (Levine, 2005). However, some studies highlight a negative or non-significant relationship which may differ depending on the sample of countries and the applied methodology, proxy of financial development, time period, etc. Based on the relevance of the topic and on the ongoing debate, the aim of this study is to explore the nexus and contribution of banking intermediation in the economic growth of some Central Eastern and South-Eastern European (CESEE) countries for the period 2010–2020. We use regression methods, ordinary least squares (OLS), and a fixed effect model to investigate the relationship between economic growth and bank intermediation. We measure the development of banking intermediation using banks’ credit to the private sector, credit to government and state-owned enterprises. The research results show that credits provided by banks do not affect economic growth and are in fact negatively related to economic growth, whereas the return on equity is positively related to economic growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行中介对经济增长的贡献:来自CESEE国家的经验证据
金融体系是经济增长的重要支持者,被称为经济活动的“血液”。许多研究揭示了金融体系在促进经济发展中的作用和重要性,通过积累和利用储蓄进行生产性投资来提高经济增长(Levine, 2005)。然而,一些研究强调了一种负的或不显著的关系,这种关系可能因国家样本和应用方法、金融发展代理、时间段等而有所不同。基于该主题的相关性和正在进行的辩论,本研究的目的是探讨银行中介在2010-2020年期间一些中东欧和东南欧(CESEE)国家经济增长中的联系和贡献。我们使用回归方法、普通最小二乘(OLS)和固定效应模型来研究经济增长与银行中介之间的关系。我们用银行对私营部门的信贷、对政府和国有企业的信贷来衡量银行中介的发展。研究结果表明,银行提供的信贷不影响经济增长,实际上与经济增长呈负相关,而净资产收益率与经济增长呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Governance and Regulation
Journal of Governance and Regulation Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Public Website Performance: Content Analyses on Malang City Government Website Local Government Preparedness in Response to the Transition from Pandemic to Endemic: An Adaptive Governance Perspective in Surabaya Municipality Environmental Policy Implementation in West Java (Studies in the Ciletuh Geopark Tourism Area) Penta Helix Model In Local Tourism Development Through “Peken Banyumasan” Policy Network on Village Development in Bandung Regency (Study on Community-Based Housing and Settlement Development)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1