Factors affecting the ongoing pregnancy rate in women with repeated implantation failure undergoing an endometrial receptivity array

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.5653/cerm.2023.06184
Hyun Kyoung Lee, Kyoung Yong Moon, Haerin Paik, Byung Chul Jee
{"title":"Factors affecting the ongoing pregnancy rate in women with repeated implantation failure undergoing an endometrial receptivity array","authors":"Hyun Kyoung Lee, Kyoung Yong Moon, Haerin Paik, Byung Chul Jee","doi":"10.5653/cerm.2023.06184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nIn this retrospective study, we analyzed factors influencing the ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) undergoing embryo transfer with endometrial receptivity array (ERA).\n\n\nMETHODS\nEighty-three consecutive personalized embryo transfers (pETs) with ERA, from 54 women with RIF, were selected from June 2020 to April 2022. Vitrified blastocyst transfer was timed based on ERA results.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe ongoing PR per pET was 33.7%. Using ERA, the endometrium was identified as pre-receptive in 26 cycles, early receptive in 25 cycles, receptive in 31 cycles, and late receptive in one cycle. With cycles categorized into three receptivity phases (pre-receptive, early receptive, or receptive), no significant differences were found in the clinical PR (27.3%, 55.6%, and 40%, respectively) or ongoing PR (9.1%, 55.6%, and 40%, respectively) after a single blastocyst transfer. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the clinical PR or ongoing PR after the transfer of two or more blastocysts. Among women with ongoing pregnancy relative to those without, age at first pET was significantly lower (35 years vs. 39 years, p=0.001), while blastocyst score (23 vs. 18, p=0.012) and the proportion of blastocyst scores >18 (71.4% vs. 38.9%, p=0.005) were significantly higher. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the woman's age (odds ratio [OR], 0.814; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.940; p=0.005) and blastocyst score >18 (OR, 3.052; 95% CI, 1.075 to 8.665; p=0.036) were identified as significant factors influencing ongoing pregnancy.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIn pET with ERA, ongoing pregnancy was closely associated with woman's age and blastocyst quality.","PeriodicalId":46409,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2023.06184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE In this retrospective study, we analyzed factors influencing the ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) undergoing embryo transfer with endometrial receptivity array (ERA). METHODS Eighty-three consecutive personalized embryo transfers (pETs) with ERA, from 54 women with RIF, were selected from June 2020 to April 2022. Vitrified blastocyst transfer was timed based on ERA results. RESULTS The ongoing PR per pET was 33.7%. Using ERA, the endometrium was identified as pre-receptive in 26 cycles, early receptive in 25 cycles, receptive in 31 cycles, and late receptive in one cycle. With cycles categorized into three receptivity phases (pre-receptive, early receptive, or receptive), no significant differences were found in the clinical PR (27.3%, 55.6%, and 40%, respectively) or ongoing PR (9.1%, 55.6%, and 40%, respectively) after a single blastocyst transfer. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the clinical PR or ongoing PR after the transfer of two or more blastocysts. Among women with ongoing pregnancy relative to those without, age at first pET was significantly lower (35 years vs. 39 years, p=0.001), while blastocyst score (23 vs. 18, p=0.012) and the proportion of blastocyst scores >18 (71.4% vs. 38.9%, p=0.005) were significantly higher. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the woman's age (odds ratio [OR], 0.814; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.940; p=0.005) and blastocyst score >18 (OR, 3.052; 95% CI, 1.075 to 8.665; p=0.036) were identified as significant factors influencing ongoing pregnancy. CONCLUSION In pET with ERA, ongoing pregnancy was closely associated with woman's age and blastocyst quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜容受性阵列对反复着床失败妇女持续妊娠率的影响因素
目的:回顾性分析子宫内膜容受性阵列(ERA)胚胎移植中反复着床失败(RIF)患者持续妊娠率(PR)的影响因素。方法:从2020年6月至2022年4月,选择54名RIF女性的83例连续的ERA个体化胚胎移植(pet)。根据ERA结果确定玻璃化囊胚移植时间。结果:每个pET的持续PR为33.7%。使用ERA,子宫内膜26个周期为前接受期,25个周期为早接受期,31个周期为接受期,1个周期为晚接受期。将周期分为三个接受期(前接受期、早期接受期或接受期),在单个囊胚移植后的临床PR(分别为27.3%、55.6%和40%)或持续PR(分别为9.1%、55.6%和40%)中未发现显著差异。同样,移植两个或两个以上囊胚后的临床PR或持续PR无显著差异。持续妊娠妇女首次pET年龄明显低于未妊娠妇女(35岁vs 39岁,<i>p</i>=0.001),而囊胚评分为> 23分vs. 18分,<i>p</i>=0.012),囊胚评分为>18分的比例明显高于未妊娠妇女(71.4% vs. 38.9%, <i>p</i>=0.005)。在多元logistic回归分析中,女性的年龄(优势比[OR], 0.814;95%置信区间[CI], 0.706 ~ 0.940;<i>p</i>=0.005),囊胚评分>18 (OR, 3.052;95% CI, 1.075 ~ 8.665;<i>p</i>=0.036)被认为是影响持续妊娠的重要因素。结论:在pET合并ERA中,持续妊娠与女性年龄和囊胚质量密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does coenzyme Q10 supplementation protect spermatogenesis in ciprofloxacin-induced rat testes? Pathological and vascular changes in the rat testiсle after experimental trauma. State-of-the-art in high throughput organ-on-chip for biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. In vivo and in vitro sperm production: an overview of the challenges and advances in male fertility restoration. Outcomes of female reproductive performance with assisted reproductive techniques after recent mild to moderate COVID-19 infections: An observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1