Policy Convergence under Decentralization: Lessons from Indonesia’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Gabriel Lele
{"title":"Policy Convergence under Decentralization: Lessons from Indonesia’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Gabriel Lele","doi":"10.30589/pgr.v7i3.792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on policy convergence has developed very significantly in comparative literature. However, little is known about the dynamics of policy convergence under unitary systems, assuming that they have greater convergence than under federal systems. This research maintains that unitary systems present no less intricate dynamics of policy convergence than the federal systems. Looking at a decentralized unitary system, this research argues that the dynamics of policy divergence is primarily driven by a need to pursue responsiveness to local priorities. It assesses the case of Indonesia in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic through qualitative and quantitative exploration, combining documentary and the named entity recognition (NER) methods. The main data were sourced from the selected national newspapers sanctioned by the Indonesian Press Board. The result points to several factors affecting policy convergence, namely, responsiveness, compliance, policy inconsistency, policy clarity, leadership, horizontal learning, and electoral politics. Of these factors, the most important one is policy responsiveness; that is, whether national and subnational policies converge or diverge is affected by the need of a subnational government to respond to local priorities. This research fills the void in the current research by understanding the interplay between domestic factors and policy convergence, thereby extending the debate on the dynamic of policy convergence under a decentralized unitary system. Working with the COVID-19 pandemic adds nuances to the literature on crisis-driven policy convergence dynamics. It also points to a practical implication on the importance of crafting better institutional arrangements on national-subnational relations to better respond to pressing issues in a more convergent manner.","PeriodicalId":32198,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Governance Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Governance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v7i3.792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on policy convergence has developed very significantly in comparative literature. However, little is known about the dynamics of policy convergence under unitary systems, assuming that they have greater convergence than under federal systems. This research maintains that unitary systems present no less intricate dynamics of policy convergence than the federal systems. Looking at a decentralized unitary system, this research argues that the dynamics of policy divergence is primarily driven by a need to pursue responsiveness to local priorities. It assesses the case of Indonesia in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic through qualitative and quantitative exploration, combining documentary and the named entity recognition (NER) methods. The main data were sourced from the selected national newspapers sanctioned by the Indonesian Press Board. The result points to several factors affecting policy convergence, namely, responsiveness, compliance, policy inconsistency, policy clarity, leadership, horizontal learning, and electoral politics. Of these factors, the most important one is policy responsiveness; that is, whether national and subnational policies converge or diverge is affected by the need of a subnational government to respond to local priorities. This research fills the void in the current research by understanding the interplay between domestic factors and policy convergence, thereby extending the debate on the dynamic of policy convergence under a decentralized unitary system. Working with the COVID-19 pandemic adds nuances to the literature on crisis-driven policy convergence dynamics. It also points to a practical implication on the importance of crafting better institutional arrangements on national-subnational relations to better respond to pressing issues in a more convergent manner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力下放下的政策趋同:印度尼西亚应对COVID-19大流行的经验教训
政策趋同的研究在比较文学中得到了很大的发展。然而,我们对单一制下政策趋同的动态知之甚少,假设单一制比联邦制有更大的趋同。这项研究认为,单一制系统呈现出的政策趋同的复杂动态并不比联邦制系统少。着眼于一个分散的单一系统,这项研究认为,政策分歧的动态主要是由对地方优先事项的响应需求驱动的。它通过定性和定量探索,结合文献和命名实体识别(NER)方法,评估印度尼西亚应对COVID-19大流行的案例。主要数据来自经印度尼西亚新闻委员会批准的选定的全国性报纸。结果指出了影响政策趋同的几个因素,即响应性、遵从性、政策不一致性、政策清晰度、领导力、横向学习和选举政治。在这些因素中,最重要的是政策响应能力;也就是说,国家和地方政策是趋同还是分化,取决于地方政府是否需要对地方优先事项作出反应。本研究通过理解国内因素与政策趋同之间的相互作用,填补了现有研究的空白,从而拓展了对分散单一制下政策趋同动态的讨论。与2019冠状病毒病大流行相关的研究为有关危机驱动的政策趋同动态的文献增添了细微差别。它还指出,就国家-地方关系制定更好的体制安排,以便以更一致的方式更好地应对紧迫问题的重要性具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
What Indonesian Netizen Says about Covid-19 Vaccination? A Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies of YouTube’s Comment Human Resources and Technology Integration in Effective Public Management Policy Convergence under Decentralization: Lessons from Indonesia’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Bureaucratic Transformation Optimizing Village Bureaucracy Transformation: Gorontalo, Indonesia The The Uniqueness of Managerial Competency Model in Indonesian Districts and Cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1