A systematic literature review on permanent ground deformation patterns imposed on buried steel pipelines

IF 4.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100151
Sylvester Agbo , Kshama Roy , Samer Adeeb , Yong Li
{"title":"A systematic literature review on permanent ground deformation patterns imposed on buried steel pipelines","authors":"Sylvester Agbo ,&nbsp;Kshama Roy ,&nbsp;Samer Adeeb ,&nbsp;Yong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Overtime, continuous research efforts have been devoted to investigating the effects of permanent ground deformation (PGD) on buried pipelines. These efforts have faced major uncertainties in the ground movement patterns that impose displacement-controlled loads on pipelines. This study presents a systematic review of the PGD patterns available in the literature for the analysis of buried pipelines, with particular emphasis on the PGD directions relative to pipeline axes. Depending on the directions, PGD patterns are divided into three groups: longitudinal, transverse and oblique. The relevant literature is organized into four main categories: experimental, numerical, analytical and probabilistic. Seven different PGD patterns (block, ramp, step, ridge, sinusoidal, asymmetric ridge, and asymmetric sinusoidal) available in the literature are discussed in this study. All these PGD patterns, except asymmetric sinusoidal, were applied in the longitudinal direction. In contrast, only three (block, sinusoidal and asymmetric sinusoidal) were applied transversely, which indicates a potential gap considering the randomness of PGD relative to pipeline axes. Besides, one additional PGD pattern (trapezoidal) is suggested in the present study based on the literature review. The findings of the present study show that 84 % of the reviewed cases considered either block or sinusoidal PGD pattern, while only 16 % considered the other PGD patterns (ramp, step, ridge, asymmetric ridge, and asymmetric sinusoidal). Almost all these 16 % reviewed cases assumed pipelines primarily as linear elastic materials. Based on these observations, the present study recommends a comprehensive study on the effects of all the mentioned PGD patterns on pipelines in all three directions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143323000434/pdfft?md5=9ad2946740083f71f6382b52286fd371&pid=1-s2.0-S2667143323000434-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143323000434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overtime, continuous research efforts have been devoted to investigating the effects of permanent ground deformation (PGD) on buried pipelines. These efforts have faced major uncertainties in the ground movement patterns that impose displacement-controlled loads on pipelines. This study presents a systematic review of the PGD patterns available in the literature for the analysis of buried pipelines, with particular emphasis on the PGD directions relative to pipeline axes. Depending on the directions, PGD patterns are divided into three groups: longitudinal, transverse and oblique. The relevant literature is organized into four main categories: experimental, numerical, analytical and probabilistic. Seven different PGD patterns (block, ramp, step, ridge, sinusoidal, asymmetric ridge, and asymmetric sinusoidal) available in the literature are discussed in this study. All these PGD patterns, except asymmetric sinusoidal, were applied in the longitudinal direction. In contrast, only three (block, sinusoidal and asymmetric sinusoidal) were applied transversely, which indicates a potential gap considering the randomness of PGD relative to pipeline axes. Besides, one additional PGD pattern (trapezoidal) is suggested in the present study based on the literature review. The findings of the present study show that 84 % of the reviewed cases considered either block or sinusoidal PGD pattern, while only 16 % considered the other PGD patterns (ramp, step, ridge, asymmetric ridge, and asymmetric sinusoidal). Almost all these 16 % reviewed cases assumed pipelines primarily as linear elastic materials. Based on these observations, the present study recommends a comprehensive study on the effects of all the mentioned PGD patterns on pipelines in all three directions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于地埋钢质管道永久地表变形模式的系统文献综述
长期以来,人们一直致力于研究永久地面变形(PGD)对埋地管道的影响。这些工作面临着对管道施加位移控制载荷的地面运动模式的重大不确定性。本研究对文献中可用于分析埋地管道的 PGD 模式进行了系统回顾,并特别强调了相对于管道轴线的 PGD 方向。根据方向的不同,PGD 模式可分为三类:纵向、横向和斜向。相关文献分为四大类:实验类、数值类、分析类和概率类。本研究讨论了文献中提供的七种不同的 PGD 模式(块状、斜坡状、阶梯状、脊状、正弦曲线状、非对称脊状和非对称正弦曲线状)。除非对称正弦波外,所有这些 PGD 模式都应用于纵向。相比之下,只有三种(块状、正弦波和非对称正弦波)是横向应用的,这表明考虑到 PGD 相对于管道轴的随机性,可能存在差距。此外,本研究还根据文献综述提出了一种额外的 PGD 模式(梯形)。本研究的结果显示,84% 的综述案例考虑了块状或正弦波 PGD 模式,只有 16% 考虑了其他 PGD 模式(斜坡、阶梯、山脊、非对称山脊和非对称正弦波)。几乎所有这 16% 的审查案例都假定管道主要是线性弹性材料。基于这些观察结果,本研究建议全面研究上述所有 PGD 模式对管道三个方向的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Study on scour stripping of oil-wax gels in pipes Development of a sectionalizing method for simulation of large-scale complicated natural gas pipeline networks Corrosion protection characteristics of doped magnetite layers on carbon steel surfaces in aqueous CO2 environments Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1